Jump to content
Newcastle-Online

NUFC transfer rumours in the press

JH

by JH
in Football

 Share

Recommended Posts

BrettNUFC

BrettNUFC

Posted
Posted

There's one problem with the current policy - even though they are good players, they aren't always what we need.

 

The most obvious example of this was when we wanted to replace Ba, didn't get Remy and then turned to Sissoko because he represented a "good deal". It's a frustrating approach which really cost us in terms of goals.

 

We hardly turned to Sissoko for Ba's replacement, we probably wouldn't have even got him so early had we not been in such a mess. Gouffran was more a last ditch replacement for Ba after our first target Remy turned us down. I think it's clear Ashley knew he made a mistake last summer and is keen not to let that happen again, many on here just went into meltdown because we never went sign crazy soon as the window opened like the mackems did. We are always going to be patient with deals unless they have already been put in place months prior.

Link to post
Share on other sites
Dokko

Dokko

Posted
Posted

it's becoming clearer by the day that those in control are actively involved in some kind of sabotage.

 

genuine question but how did you reach this conclusion?

 

A more pertinent question, considering the information and evidence available to us all, would be: How can anyone not reach that conclusion?

 

Patience is probably needed before jumping to those kind of conclusions. It's back to the great old saying, wait till the window is closed before judging, especially if you are going to accuse the club of sabotage.

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites
Dokko

Dokko

Posted
Posted

:lol: See my reply to the last guy to drag up that post.

 

Drag, is that you trying to not take responsibility for the stuff you post.  :lol:

 

I mean Jesus, it was so like two weeks ago, how dare you.

Link to post
Share on other sites
Guest icemanblue

Guest icemanblue

Posted
Posted

Well, considering I posted this in response:

 

it's becoming clearer by the day that those in control are actively involved in some kind of sabotage

 

how does the remy signing fit into the sabotage theory then? ???

 

perhaps they know he's bang to rights guilty on the rape charge and as soon as the transfer window SLAMS SHUT he'll be carted off to the big house leaving shola to play up front on his own after they implicate cisse during the trial

 

maybe they know he'll sign for real madrid next summer after scoring 30 goals and are playing the sabotage long game

 

i just don't know

 

I might have been wrong, like. Which I'll be more than happy to admit. :lol:

 

Let's not get too carried away just yet, like.

 

No, not really.

Link to post
Share on other sites
mrmojorisin75

mrmojorisin75

Posted
Posted

5 Million for 29 year old Stewart Downing or £8m for 21 year old Tom Ince, hmm I wonder which to go with..  Seriously even from the perspective of pure value Ince is the far better deal due to his age, then there's the fact he's a much better player.  We'd be absolutely mental to go for Downing.

 

mind boggling thought isn't it?  with pardiola and killer joe running the show it's almost a nailed on certainty which one we'll be after :anguish:

 

I'm not buying this like. Our policy of buying players over the last 18 Months or so would actually suggest we'd go for the younger with a better re-sale. Sick of reading negative posts like this which are negative just for the sake of it.

 

Just one of those things you have to come to accept on here that if we get Downing that's Pardew's choice, if we get Ince that's a great choice by Carr. Similarly to Gomis is Carr's, Bent is Pardew's, no teamwork and agreements in this game.

 

here, self-congratulation society, it's not baseless negativity thanks very much....as dave has also pointed out the age policy seems to have relaxed, our manager publicly stated he wanted more "experience" and we've publicly said we're interested in 28 year old gomis, 29 year old bent and now a rumour pops up about 29 year old downing...we've signed 27 (?) year old remy too

 

so yeah, sorry boys, it's all me and teasy making shit up and being super-negative about pardew

Link to post
Share on other sites
Stuy_O

Stuy_O

Posted
Posted

We do buy what we need, we just don't always end up with them at exactly the right time. I do think we should get some credit for bringing all those signings forward to January though, although obviously we needed players the previous summer as well.

 

Personally dont buy this bringing signings forward to January, purely because they should have been done the summer before. It was patently clear we needed players then and the neglect shown imo was shocking.

 

By bringing them forward to January, they club are effectively admitting they had no intention of recruiting for a whole season excluding Anita, which is criminal when you think about it.

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites
NoU

NoU

Posted
Posted

We do buy what we need, we just don't always end up with them at exactly the right time. I do think we should get some credit for bringing all those signings forward to January though, although obviously we needed players the previous summer as well.

 

Personally dont buy this bringing signings forward to January, purely because they should have been done the summer before. It was patently clear we needed players then and the neglect shown imo was shocking.

 

By bringing them forward to January, they club are effectively admitting they had no intention of recruiting for a whole season excluding Anita, which is criminal when you think about it.

I'd rather we get the right players at the wrong time, than the wrong players at the right time.
Link to post
Share on other sites
Teasy

Teasy

Posted
Posted

We do buy what we need, we just don't always end up with them at exactly the right time. I do think we should get some credit for bringing all those signings forward to January though, although obviously we needed players the previous summer as well.

 

Personally dont buy this bringing signings forward to January, purely because they should have been done the summer before. It was patently clear we needed players then and the neglect shown imo was shocking.

 

By bringing them forward to January, they club are effectively admitting they had no intention of recruiting for a whole season excluding Anita, which is criminal when you think about it.

 

 

 

 

Not really no, just means we had no intention of signing Gouffran, Yanga-Mbiwa and Sissoko that season.  That doesnt mean we werent looking to sign other plays that summer with those three lined up for this summer, before bringing them forward to January.  Cost nearly £10m to get those three six months early BTW.

Link to post
Share on other sites
TaylorJ_01

TaylorJ_01

Posted
Posted

Would much rather have Maloney over Downing, can't see him costing anywhere near as much either (fee or wages).

 

Dis. Maloney is a good player and deserves a couple more seasons in the the top flight given his recovery from disappointing spells at other clubs. Really worked hard.

Link to post
Share on other sites
Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
 Share
Go to topic listing
×
×
  • Create New...