Ted Maul Posted July 9, 2012 Share Posted July 9, 2012 What I find the funniest about that whole issue is the mack-tracking regarding Sunderland's squad. At the start of the season they were going to come above us and beat us in the derbies because they had a better squad on paper. Now the great Arty Ziff has endured a virtually identical run to what Bruce was sacked for, it's because he inherited an awful squad off useless fat Mag Steve Bruce Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
RodneyCisse Posted July 9, 2012 Share Posted July 9, 2012 Funny thing is they will blame Bruce this season too. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Wilson Posted July 9, 2012 Share Posted July 9, 2012 Their meltdown re: our televised friendlies happened yet? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
brummie Posted July 9, 2012 Share Posted July 9, 2012 totally pointless, whereas, if you do it the fair way, bruce's first 14 games v mons first 14 games: Bruce W2 D5 L7 O'Neill W8 D2 L4 Read more: http://www.readytogo.net/smb/showthread.php?t=714078#ixzz207NmsrQj None of them seem to have mentioned the fact that MON plays the same XI week in, week out - as he doesn't believe in squads - till they're so knackered, the results go totally to shit. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
mattypnufc Posted July 9, 2012 Share Posted July 9, 2012 Their meltdown re: our televised friendlies happened yet? LOL. I fully expect this to happen. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Benwell Lad Posted July 9, 2012 Share Posted July 9, 2012 What I find the funniest about that whole issue is the mack-tracking regarding Sunderland's squad. At the start of the season they were going to come above us and beat us in the derbies because they had a better squad on paper. Now the great Arty Ziff has endured a virtually identical run to what Bruce was sacked for, it's because he inherited an awful squad off useless fat Mag Steve Bruce And the grand architect of the Bruce era, Nile Quin, is held somewhere between legend and sainthood status in their esteem. He'd have been lynched on Tyneside. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Darth Crooks Posted July 9, 2012 Share Posted July 9, 2012 Never known a forum where 'fuck off' is pretty much par for the course more than RTG. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dave Posted July 9, 2012 Share Posted July 9, 2012 Never known a forum where 'fuck off' is pretty much par for the course more than RTG. Fuck off. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tiresias Posted July 9, 2012 Share Posted July 9, 2012 Piss off for me like Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dr. Nguyen Van Falk Posted July 9, 2012 Share Posted July 9, 2012 If they implemented a rules system akin to the one on here where abuse was punishable with a ban and they had single threads for certain topics then I can imagine it would be a quality forum. Oh and get rid of the random 'we should sign *insert player name here*' every time a player does well on a televised game. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Darth Crooks Posted July 9, 2012 Share Posted July 9, 2012 Never known a forum where 'fuck off' is pretty much par for the course more than RTG. Fuck off. http://media.tumblr.com/tumblr_m4vil5J6uA1qj3ir1.gif Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dave Posted July 9, 2012 Share Posted July 9, 2012 http://img684.imageshack.us/img684/4118/lolidunno.jpg Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest neesy111 Posted July 9, 2012 Share Posted July 9, 2012 totally pointless, whereas, if you do it the fair way, bruce's first 14 games v mons first 14 games: Bruce W2 D5 L7 O'Neill W8 D2 L4 Read more: http://www.readytogo.net/smb/showthread.php?t=714078#ixzz207NmsrQj None of them seem to have mentioned the fact that MON plays the same XI week in, week out - as he doesn't believe in squads - till they're so knackered, the results go totally to shit. Didn't win in last 9 games of the season. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
NG32 Posted July 9, 2012 Share Posted July 9, 2012 Its ok, it was Brewcies team not MONs Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Mackem Logic Posted July 9, 2012 Share Posted July 9, 2012 Even Piers Morgan is Mack-Tracking now.... Piers Morgan @piersmorgan Wimbledon was a borough in the county of Surrey until it was absorbed into the Greater London Borough of Merton in 1965.... Piers Morgan @piersmorgan ..So, technically, @Georgia_Ford was right to ask the question because the Wimbledon Championships weren't held in London until after 1965. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
LRD Posted July 9, 2012 Share Posted July 9, 2012 Read wiki's entry on Sunderland's 05/06 season after the previous few posts and came across this excellent bit. Alternate Reality If there had been more money to spend, if Mick had been more wise in the transfer market and if Sunderland had not been beset by injuries, this squad, which would have been far more capable of avoiding relegation, would have been available for Sunderland: Also their season summary is one big blur of (classy) text. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
leffe186 Posted July 9, 2012 Share Posted July 9, 2012 Never known a forum where 'f*** off' is pretty much par for the course more than RTG. f*** off. http://media.tumblr.com/tumblr_m4vil5J6uA1qj3ir1.gif well played - how have I not seen this one before? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dave Posted July 9, 2012 Share Posted July 9, 2012 http://www.casinos-online.co.uk/news/20120709/worldlink-reveals-second-premier-league-partner/ Premier League football club Newcastle United FC ( Newcastle ) has become the second to sign heads of terms with WorldLink (see previous report), following in Sunderland AFC's footsteps. ZOMG FTM!!!!!!!!!!!!!!111 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ritchie Posted July 9, 2012 Share Posted July 9, 2012 http://www.dailymail.co.uk/sport/football/article-2171190/Sunderland-told-pay-15m-Steven-Fletcher.html Wolves want fifteen million for Fletcher. :lol: Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Willow Posted July 9, 2012 Share Posted July 9, 2012 http://www.dailymail.co.uk/sport/football/article-2171190/Sunderland-told-pay-15m-Steven-Fletcher.html Wolves want fifteen million for Fletcher. :lol: http://i.imgur.com/BlgWl.gif Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ketsbaia Posted July 9, 2012 Share Posted July 9, 2012 If £10m is excessive, I dunno what to call £15m DO IT!!! Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tiresias Posted July 9, 2012 Share Posted July 9, 2012 that they're asking that much if Sunderland actually pay it Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Disco Posted July 9, 2012 Share Posted July 9, 2012 Wolves were in very good shape financially before they went down so I doubt there is need for a fire sale. Remember reading they'd already sold out that new stand they'd built too. £15m though, madness. Saying that he is pretty much a guarantee for 12-13 goals next year. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
BottledDog Posted July 9, 2012 Share Posted July 9, 2012 http://www.casinos-online.co.uk/news/20120709/worldlink-reveals-second-premier-league-partner/ Premier League football club Newcastle United FC ( Newcastle ) has become the second to sign heads of terms with WorldLink (see previous report), following in Sunderland AFC's footsteps. ZOMG FTM!!!!!!!!!!!!!!111 Blue chip company? I haven't the foggiest who they are even after googling the buggers. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mole_Toonfan Posted July 9, 2012 Share Posted July 9, 2012 If £10m is excessive, I dunno what to call £15m DO IT!!! I'd call it " only Man City would pay that for the lulz" if they do that they want locking up. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts