Unbelievable Posted August 24, 2012 Share Posted August 24, 2012 http://www.readytogo.net/smb/showpost.php?p=13281816&postcount=99 The first line Anyone who thinks this is a good singing is moronic. I'd rather have Johnson than Obertan tbh. This is isn't football manager, Johnson wouldn't be any more than a squad player for us. To be fair, I think he wouldn't look out of place in our first 11. We don't need him as we have other, comparable options, but if we were looking for a winger I wouldn't mind him. As for the mackems, he's much better than anything they've got, so definitely a good signing for them. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
JH Posted August 24, 2012 Share Posted August 24, 2012 Going round FB: Not him. Too small. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Lush Vlad Posted August 24, 2012 Share Posted August 24, 2012 Didn't they have a worryingly high wages to turnover ratio when their accounts were published? They're hardly going to decrease that with MON in charge, making his usual overpriced, overpaid signings! Think Johnson will be a top signing for them. Fletcher is half decent but is very 'meh' to me. Would be disappointed if we forked out 14 million quid for him. Then again, he's streets ahead of anything else they have up top, so beggars can't be choosers. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Hanshithispantz Posted August 24, 2012 Share Posted August 24, 2012 Obviously they've paid massively over the odds for Fletcher but Johnson is a fantastic signing for them. They now have a player who could actually walk into our squad Fees & wages(being generous - £40k pw each) would be close to 40% of their turnover, they better deliver top half finishes or the club will never turn a profit. Financially they are taking a huge gamble. I cannot say i'm privy to their finances tbh but I think £10m(?) and £40k is a good deal for Johnson, it's just a shame for them that every other deal they've made in the past couple of years (bar Sess & Larsson) has been horrific. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ketsbaia Posted August 24, 2012 Share Posted August 24, 2012 Johnson is an ok player that's been exaggerated by hype. At Boro, he was a squad player until they got relegated and he had a brilliant half a season in the Championship. Then he joined Man City and has been a squad player again. He'll occasionally play against lower sides and do well but he's surrounded by world class players so of course he will. He's also never shone for England, as shown by his omission from the Euro 2012 squad. I just don't think he's a player that a mid-table club should pin their hopes on. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Hanshithispantz Posted August 24, 2012 Share Posted August 24, 2012 Fletcher is half decent but is very 'meh' to me. Would be disappointed if we forked out 14 million quid for him. I would be mortified Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Lush Vlad Posted August 24, 2012 Share Posted August 24, 2012 Fletcher is half decent but is very 'meh' to me. Would be disappointed if we forked out 14 million quid for him. I would be mortified Yeah maybe disappointed wasn't a strong enough adjective. Suicidal would be more appropriate Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
brummie Posted August 24, 2012 Share Posted August 24, 2012 Fletcher is half decent but is very 'meh' to me. Would be disappointed if we forked out 14 million quid for him. I would be mortified The thing they should be most worried about is that MON has learned absolutely nothing, and is making the same expensive moves he always has done. It's not so much about 14m for Fletcher being over the top, it is that it's a lazy signing - uk based, too much, big money etc etc, in other words, exactly like I've been banging on about for ages. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mole_Toonfan Posted August 24, 2012 Share Posted August 24, 2012 http://www.readytogo.net/smb/showpost.php?p=13281816&postcount=99 The first line Anyone who thinks this is a good singing is moronic. I'd rather have Johnson than Obertan tbh. This is isn't football manager, Johnson wouldn't be any more than a squad player for us. To be fair, I think he wouldn't look out of place in our first 11. We don't need him as we have other, comparable options, but if we were looking for a winger I wouldn't mind him. As for the mackems, he's much better than anything they've got, so definitely a good signing for them. That's the point really we are very well stocked in midfield and in wide areas. We would have to drop either Jonas in 4-4-2 or Demba in a 4-3-3 and neither would happen. There's other priorities than get an expensive bench player. Great signing for them though if it happens as is Fletcher despite the over the top fee, had them down for relegation before think i might rethink that. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dr. Nguyen Van Falk Posted August 24, 2012 Share Posted August 24, 2012 http://www.readytogo.net/smb/showpost.php?p=13281816&postcount=99 The first line Anyone who thinks this is a good singing is moronic. Why? You have to ask why paying £14m for Fletcher isn't moronic? £14m... £14m... Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest reefatoon Posted August 24, 2012 Share Posted August 24, 2012 http://www.readytogo.net/smb/showpost.php?p=13281816&postcount=99 The first line Anyone who thinks this is a good singing is moronic. I'd rather have Johnson than Obertan tbh. This is isn't football manager, Johnson wouldn't be any more than a squad player for us. To be fair, I think he wouldn't look out of place in our first 11. We don't need him as we have other, comparable options, but if we were looking for a winger I wouldn't mind him. As for the mackems, he's much better than anything they've got, so definitely a good signing for them. That's the point really we are very well stocked in midfield and in wide areas. We would have to drop either Jonas in 4-4-2 or Demba in a 4-3-3 and neither would happen. There's other priorities than get an expensive bench player. Great signing for them though if it happens as is Fletcher despite the over the top fee, had them down for relegation before think i might rethink that. Hold your horses for now, both Wolves and Boro went down with those playing . . . . Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mole_Toonfan Posted August 24, 2012 Share Posted August 24, 2012 Tbf they have better players than Boro or Wolves did, still not great but better than that. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Unbelievable Posted August 24, 2012 Share Posted August 24, 2012 http://www.readytogo.net/smb/showpost.php?p=13281816&postcount=99 The first line Anyone who thinks this is a good singing is moronic. Why? You have to ask why paying £14m for Fletcher isn't moronic? £14m... Ah sorry, thought that was about Johnson. Apologies. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
High Five o Posted August 24, 2012 Share Posted August 24, 2012 10+5 for Johnson ? (Twitter) Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
TRon Posted August 24, 2012 Share Posted August 24, 2012 Johnson always struck me as having ability but not much desire. Not a bad signing for Sunderland but I don't think he's going to make that much difference to them in the bigger scheme of things. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Unbelievable Posted August 24, 2012 Share Posted August 24, 2012 10+5 for Johnson ? (Twitter) Also rumours he'll be their best ever paid player. Now he would improve them significantly, but they would be paying well over the odds again. Imagine what we could have done with the 30 million they're shelling out on Fletcher and Johnson.. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Fenham Mag Posted August 24, 2012 Share Posted August 24, 2012 Sessegnon money. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
gbandit Posted August 24, 2012 Share Posted August 24, 2012 10+5 for Johnson ? (Twitter) Also rumours he'll be their best ever paid player. Now he would improve them significantly, but they would be paying well over the odds again. Imagine what we could have done with the 30 million they're shelling out on Fletcher and Johnson.. Thing is, that's what they have to do to get decent to good players to go there. I really like both Fletcher and Johnson and while I don't want either here, I think they'll be two of their best players (if Johnson signs) this season and for the next couple. The problem is, when you're signing at such a premium, you're hurting the club financially and stopping it from moving forward properly. The only model that could make Sunderland a top football club would be one where they had an incredibly good scouting system and picked up young players like we're doing. Unfortunately, they have Marty who likes to blow his load all over the place Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Unbelievable Posted August 24, 2012 Share Posted August 24, 2012 10+5 for Johnson ? (Twitter) Also rumours he'll be their best ever paid player. Now he would improve them significantly, but they would be paying well over the odds again. Imagine what we could have done with the 30 million they're shelling out on Fletcher and Johnson.. Thing is, that's what they have to do to get decent to good players to go there. I really like both Fletcher and Johnson and while I don't want either here, I think they'll be two of their best players (if Johnson signs) this season and for the next couple. The problem is, when you're signing at such a premium, you're hurting the club financially and stopping it from moving forward properly. The only model that could make Sunderland a top football club would be one where they had an incredibly good scouting system and picked up young players like we're doing. Unfortunately, they have Marty who likes to blow his load all over the place Agreed. For a club like them to attract relatively established players they simply have to pay over the odds, especially in terms of wages, for the player to even consider the move. The alternative, spending sensibly and trying to develop younger players doesn't seem to be on the agenda, which has only been aggravated by bringing MON in. They have been reporting operating losses of 30 odd million per year for a few seasons now. The next set of accounts will be absolutely horrific unless they manage to sell one of their players to Liverpool again. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gallowgate Toon Posted August 24, 2012 Share Posted August 24, 2012 I really just don't get the level of hype Johnson has, he's 25 years of age and all he has to show for it is a good half a season in the Championship and some goals and assists as a peripheral substitute at City, in what way does he deserve a 10 million pound price tag? It's interesting reading Blue Moon and speaking to City fans compared to opinions on here. The majority acknowledge that he has good technique but is lacking in other areas, he doesn't work hard on or off the pitch with an apparently poor attitude, he has questionable fitness, is too slow, disappears out of matches and has been easily nullified since opposition have figured out what he's all about on that right hand side. He just strikes me as a player who has the odd moment but overall flatters to deceive, a luxury player. Adding to that, he really doesn't seem to fit in to O'Neill's philosophy either. It's interesting looking at who he's going to replace too, which looks to be Larsson, an inferior footballer no doubt but someone who produced well in terms of goals and assists last season, in my opinion it'll statistically be a like for like swap. Fletcher is someone who I think will improve them though, yes they've paid over the odds but he offers what Bendtner did in terms of overall play and has a higher goal threat as well as being a hard worker. I think with him on board they'll snatch a top half finish. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tiresias Posted August 24, 2012 Share Posted August 24, 2012 Well maybe Larson and Johnson will rotate to which ever is suited OH WAIT Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mole_Toonfan Posted August 24, 2012 Share Posted August 24, 2012 I really just don't get the level of hype Johnson has, he's 25 years of age and all he has to show for it is a good half a season in the Championship and some goals and assists as a peripheral substitute at City, in what way does he deserve a 10 million pound price tag? It's interesting reading Blue Moon and speaking to City fans compared to opinions on here. The majority acknowledge that he has good technique but is lacking in other areas, he doesn't work hard on or off the pitch with an apparently poor attitude, he has questionable fitness, is too slow, disappears out of matches and has been easily nullified since opposition have figured out what he's all about on that right hand side. He just strikes me as a player who has the odd moment but overall flatters to deceive, a luxury player. Adding to that, he really doesn't seem to fit in to O'Neill's philosophy either. It's interesting looking at who he's going to replace too, which looks to be Larsson, an inferior footballer no doubt but someone who produced well in terms of goals and assists last season, in my opinion it'll statistically be a like for like swap. Fletcher is someone who I think will improve them though, yes they've paid over the odds but he offers what Bendtner did in terms of overall play and has a higher goal threat as well as being a hard worker. I think with him on board they'll snatch a top half finish. I completely agree with you, having said that he's still much better than what they have. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Unbelievable Posted August 24, 2012 Share Posted August 24, 2012 I really just don't get the level of hype Johnson has, he's 25 years of age and all he has to show for it is a good half a season in the Championship and some goals and assists as a peripheral substitute at City, in what way does he deserve a 10 million pound price tag? It's interesting reading Blue Moon and speaking to City fans compared to opinions on here. The majority acknowledge that he has good technique but is lacking in other areas, he doesn't work hard on or off the pitch with an apparently poor attitude, he has questionable fitness, is too slow, disappears out of matches and has been easily nullified since opposition have figured out what he's all about on that right hand side. He just strikes me as a player who has the odd moment but overall flatters to deceive, a luxury player. Adding to that, he really doesn't seem to fit in to O'Neill's philosophy either. It's interesting looking at who he's going to replace too, which looks to be Larsson, an inferior footballer no doubt but someone who produced well in terms of goals and assists last season, in my opinion it'll statistically be a like for like swap. Fletcher is someone who I think will improve them though, yes they've paid over the odds but he offers what Bendtner did in terms of overall play and has a higher goal threat as well as being a hard worker. I think with him on board they'll snatch a top half finish. Still got 7 goals in his last two seasons despite being a bit part player for Man City. Also has more pace than you give him credit for. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Chris_R Posted August 24, 2012 Share Posted August 24, 2012 Really don't what Johnson signing for that rabble, he's far too good for them. Not a world-beater by any means, but too good for them and would help them get a lot of points. Sessègnon, McClean, Johnson, Fletcher - It's quite a decent lineup tbh. Not stellar, but good enough to worry teams and get results. Certainly good enough for a top-half finish, and considering we're looking at 5-8th, top half for Sunderland is far too close for comfort. I'm hoping for an 11th hour Spurs bid or something. And then Sessègnon to go as well. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
STM Posted August 24, 2012 Share Posted August 24, 2012 Fletcher and Johnson will improve them. However, they have paid far too much and we are still far better all over the pitch. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts