Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Simpson is Top 10 level, not Champions League level. That is still adequate for where we are realistically targetting for this season.

 

Having said that, an identical performance but one better throw in over the course of last season by a different player would have got us top 4.

Link to post
Share on other sites

According to Mark Douglas in his article today, we only need to raise the Debuchy bid by £1m, we won't because of his age.

 

Meet them half way, 500k

 

The rumour is that the club doesn't want to budge because they thought they had an agreement with Lille, only for them to demand more.

Link to post
Share on other sites

According to Mark Douglas in his article today, we only need to raise the Debuchy bid by £1m, we won't because of his age.

 

Meet them half way, 500k

 

The rumour is that the club doesn't want to budge because they thought they had an agreement with Lille, only for them to demand more.

 

I wouldn't call it a rumour tbh, Pardew has been quoted as saying as much.

Link to post
Share on other sites

A different playing not getting back on the line could have cost us a few points too...

 

Some would argue that a better player wouldn't have allowed it to get to that stage in the first place....

 

So all his goal line clearances came about from him fucking up initially? Doubt that.

Link to post
Share on other sites

A different playing not getting back on the line could have cost us a few points too...

 

Some would argue that a better player wouldn't have allowed it to get to that stage in the first place....

 

So all his goal line clearances came about from him f***ing up initially? Doubt that.

 

Didn't mean that, i meant having better players would mean keeping the ball better so less chances for the opposition and we wouldn't need to defend for our lives as often and need to make goal-line clearances.

 

Obviously not all Simpson's fault but still a point that should be made.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Us being frugal isn't a terrible way to go in the financial climate of the game, and Pardew all but confirmed that at the talk-in last night. But it'd be absolutely fucking scandalous if we missed out on this player over the sake of £1m, regardless of the success we've had with this policy so far. You've got to find a medium somewhere; we can't forget that Cabaye and Ben Arfa were two of the bargains of the century at less than £5m each. You can throw Ba in with that, too. Surely we can afford to relinquish our stubbornness just a bit.

 

He's a fantastic player who would improve us immeasurably, and he wants to come here. There should be no excuses if we miss out on him.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Wish we'd just stump up if we're talking about 500k. If we'd signed him a month ago we'd have already paid him a minimum 120k in wages. Seems a bit mad to me.

 

Maybe MA wants to save a further £70k and get him in 2wks time...

Link to post
Share on other sites

Saw some highlights of Lille's match at the weekend and he looked quality in an attacking sense. :(

 

Aye, saw that too.

 

I can see why people want us to just stump up the extra cash, but if we hold our ground here and ultimately get the player without raising our bid again it'll serve us well in the future. Sends a message.

 

Not sure it's worth the risk of missing out entirely of course.

Link to post
Share on other sites

From a business (Ashley) point of view if they have named a price that we find acceptable, he may as well play hard ball hoping to knock of half a million or whatever and if not meet their demands nearer the window closing. Especially as the player has made it so clear he wants to come.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I suppose Mike probably doesn't want to look like he's been dictated too. Maybe in his mind he is thinking if he folds on this deal, that future negotiations may go this way. I agree with the principle of this but given that this guy will improve our team significantly I want us to fold if it is true that the want an extra £1million.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Guest Phil K

It's getting silly now. Any small financial saving made by letting this drag are negated by the benefits of a full pre-season. Whether its 5 or 6 million, we'll have robbed them either way.

Strangely I agree with Ashley on not giving in to the Lille prez's posturing
Link to post
Share on other sites

I'd rather have spent that £1m and have him integrated during pre-season. Worked wonders for Cabaye, etc.

 

(that is, obviously, assuming that rumour is true)

 

Aye it would have been money well spent imo. Not in favour of doing it for every player, don't like being held to ransom or being shafted but for the extra million I'd have just paid it and brought him in on this occasion. The upgrade at RB justifies it imo.

 

Each to their own though. I can also understand why the club are digging their heels in but I'd pay it. 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...