littlelunchbox Posted January 19, 2014 Share Posted January 19, 2014 Anita off Shola on is a shocking sub and tells you all about what Pardew had planned. Pardew stats tells you that he wasn't tall enough for the entire second half. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
TherealnorthernTOON Posted January 19, 2014 Share Posted January 19, 2014 People slag off Pardew for taking off Anita alot on here. But West Ham intended to go route one from very early in the second half. Getting another big CF on the pitch would mean even more of that lumping it forwards. They took the game into the air and Pardew responded by getting some more aerial ability for set pieces aswell as an way out. I'm not for putting Shola on by all means, but tactically I can agree with the decision. Even more so if we actually had a decent alternative to do so. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dr Colossus Posted January 19, 2014 Share Posted January 19, 2014 If they intended to take the game into the air, why let them take the initiative and respond to how they wanted to play. Nullify it, keep the ball on the floor and don't let them do what suits them. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
George Bailey Posted January 19, 2014 Share Posted January 19, 2014 If they intended to take the game into the air, why let them take the initiative and respond to how they wanted to play. Nullify it, keep the ball on the floor and don't let them do what suits them. Sums up Pardew and his ilk of manager perfectly. Far too negative and over concerned trying to overcome the oppostion tactics by actually doing the opposite of what they should be doing. They're like a boxer who allows himself to be pulled into a slugfest and goes toe to toe with a lesser talented boxer. Rather than keeping to their own plan and nullify the oppositon that way. Its his limitations as a manager perfectly exposed. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
mrmojorisin75 Posted January 20, 2014 Share Posted January 20, 2014 If they intended to take the game into the air, why let them take the initiative and respond to how they wanted to play. Nullify it, keep the ball on the floor and don't let them do what suits them. pro-pardew side of the forum: http://troll.me/images/conspiracy-keanu/mind-blown.jpg Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Lotus Posted January 20, 2014 Share Posted January 20, 2014 If they intended to take the game into the air, why let them take the initiative and respond to how they wanted to play. Nullify it, keep the ball on the floor and don't let them do what suits them. I'm not sure i understand that..... You can keep the ball on the floor all you like when you have it. If the other team want to lump every time you can't change that by simply keeping it pretty when you have it. You do have to be able to deal with the aerial ball. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
AyeDubbleYoo Posted January 20, 2014 Share Posted January 20, 2014 pro-pardew side of the forum Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
mrmojorisin75 Posted January 20, 2014 Share Posted January 20, 2014 pro-pardew side of the forum didn't really know how to term it, what's better just "deluded"? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
mrmojorisin75 Posted January 20, 2014 Share Posted January 20, 2014 If they intended to take the game into the air, why let them take the initiative and respond to how they wanted to play. Nullify it, keep the ball on the floor and don't let them do what suits them. I'm not sure i understand that..... You can keep the ball on the floor all you like when you have it. If the other team want to lump every time you can't change that by simply keeping it pretty when you have it. You do have to be able to deal with the aerial ball. i imagine the intent would be to deal with their high ball and counter it by keeping it yourself by winning the second ball*, and keeping it on the ground when you get it...can't see how the 2 things are mutually exclusive, plenty of clubs come under pressure from long ball football, they don't all answer that by camping on the edge of their own box and wheeling out a corpse to kick the ball 50 yards at *arguably our best second ball winner just happens to be big vurn Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Beren Posted January 28, 2014 Share Posted January 28, 2014 Someone tell Vurnon he's allowed in their box from time to time Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
BottledDog Posted January 29, 2014 Share Posted January 29, 2014 Ah man, love his post match interview. http://www1.skysports.com/watch/video/9139122/anita-not-disheartened-by-draw? Derby? Let's make it a beautiful day! Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dave Posted January 29, 2014 Share Posted January 29, 2014 The one thing about Cabaye not being replaced would be that Anita gets more starts. Cracking little player IMO, given a long run in the team I think he'll only improve. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
ponsaelius Posted January 29, 2014 Share Posted January 29, 2014 Agree but as much as I like him and what he brings he'll never be a Cabaye replacement in terms of what he offers in terms of goals, incisive passing and free kicks. We desparately need to sign somebody that can complement Anita and Tiote as the midfield. I'd be going for somebody with less defensive responsibility than Cabaye had but with better dribbling ability and control in tight spaces (the one area I think Cabaye lacked, he was more or less ace at everything else). Something closer to a proper #10. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Beren Posted January 29, 2014 Share Posted January 29, 2014 Agree but as much as I like him and what he brings he'll never be a Cabaye replacement in terms of what he offers in terms of goals, incisive passing and free kicks. We desparately need to sign somebody that can complement Anita and Tiote as the midfield. I'd be going for somebody with less defensive responsibility than Cabaye had but with better dribbling ability and control in tight spaces (the one area I think Cabaye lacked, he was more or less ace at everything else). Something closer to a proper #10. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
AlanSkÃrare Posted January 29, 2014 Share Posted January 29, 2014 I really hope Pardew sees what this man brings to our team. His energy and movement transforms us to some degree. We win time on the ball because of his technique, he imposes more pressure on the ball and is always finding space. I think he's "freeing" us up. We've collapsed, both on and off the ball, when he's been subbed lately. Fair play to him for sticking through a difficult start as well, he's coming into his own now and getting much deserved praise. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Nobody Posted January 29, 2014 Share Posted January 29, 2014 I really hope Pardew sees what this man brings to our team. His energy and movement transforms us to some degree. We win time on the ball because of his technique, he imposes more pressure on the ball and is always finding space. I think he's "freeing" us up. We've collapsed, both on and off the ball, when he's been subbed lately. Fair play to him for sticking through a difficult start as well, he's coming into his own now and getting much deserved praise. We also win the ball much higher up the pitch with him in the team due to his excellent reading of the game and harrying in midfield. Cracking player, but like Sewelly said, he will never be a Cabaye replacement unfortunately. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
sugoinufc Posted January 29, 2014 Share Posted January 29, 2014 Someone tell Vurnon he's allowed in their box from time to time tbf - i noticed him 1-2 times in each of the last 2 matches where he took the late run into the box and had a free position - but the pass from either remy and sammy didn´t come. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
sugoinufc Posted January 29, 2014 Share Posted January 29, 2014 also as others have mentioned - he will probably never score the amount of goals Kebabs did. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Roger Kint Posted January 29, 2014 Share Posted January 29, 2014 Someone tell Vurnon he's allowed in their box from time to time We will need him for front post flick on's if Santon continues to take corners...... Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Lotus Posted January 29, 2014 Share Posted January 29, 2014 Someone tell Vurnon he's allowed in their box from time to time We will need him for front post flick on's if Santon continues to take corners...... :lol: Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
BrettNUFC Posted January 29, 2014 Share Posted January 29, 2014 Someone tell Vurnon he's allowed in their box from time to time We will need him for front post flick on's if Santon continues to take corners...... Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
KDT Posted January 29, 2014 Share Posted January 29, 2014 He should be on set pieces, he's got decent delivery and he's never going to win a header in the box. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Lotus Posted January 29, 2014 Share Posted January 29, 2014 Wish i could be sold on this guy, but i'm not.... Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
The College Dropout Posted January 29, 2014 Share Posted January 29, 2014 Wish i could be sold on this guy, but i'm not.... What is it that has you unconvinced? He does what he does very well imo. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
BrettNUFC Posted January 29, 2014 Share Posted January 29, 2014 Wish i could be sold on this guy, but i'm not.... What is it that has you unconvinced? He does what he does very well imo. Not sure i want to see the answer to this question I thought everyone loved Vern Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now