Guest BooBoo Posted October 7, 2012 Share Posted October 7, 2012 It's incredible really that Lawro retains employment when I've never seen or heard anyone who actually rates or likes his punditry. His voice is annoying, his knowledge is limited and his jokes are terrible. It's baffling that season after season, he gets kept on. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Wilson Posted October 7, 2012 Share Posted October 7, 2012 hope hope hope he gets banned for that Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dave Posted October 7, 2012 Share Posted October 7, 2012 There you go, judgement made. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest BooBoo Posted October 7, 2012 Share Posted October 7, 2012 There you go, judgement made. Brushed under the carpet? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
WarrenBartonCentrePartin Posted October 7, 2012 Share Posted October 7, 2012 It's incredible really that Lawro retains employment when I've never seen or heard anyone who actually rates or likes his punditry. His voice is annoying, his knowledge is limited and his jokes are terrible. It's baffling that season after season, he gets kept on. Same goes for Hansen. Pair of them should have been binned when BBC got the highlights back from ITV. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
jdckelly Posted October 7, 2012 Share Posted October 7, 2012 ah the he's a man u player so dont ban him treatment Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Wilson Posted October 7, 2012 Share Posted October 7, 2012 There you go, judgement made. Brushed under the carpet? 'he was just a little bit naughty' Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
BONTEMPI Posted October 7, 2012 Share Posted October 7, 2012 After watching that again, Willo needs leading to the back field. Appauling they get paid that much and can't even keep track of a runner Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
SirLes9 Posted October 7, 2012 Share Posted October 7, 2012 Bit rich us asking for Van Persie to get banned for the elbow when you look at Tiote's tackle/stamp on Cleverley. Poor challenge. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest BooBoo Posted October 7, 2012 Share Posted October 7, 2012 Bit rich us asking for Van Persie to get banned for the elbow when you look at Tiote's tackle/stamp on Cleverley. Poor challenge. Should have been off for that. Was a shocker and if it had been reversed we would have been up in arms. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
SirLes9 Posted October 7, 2012 Share Posted October 7, 2012 Bit rich us asking for Van Persie to get banned for the elbow when you look at Tiote's tackle/stamp on Cleverley. Poor challenge. Should have been off for that. Was a shocker and if it had been reversed we would have been up in arms. Definitely. He needs to cut that out of his game. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
WarrenBartonCentrePartin Posted October 7, 2012 Share Posted October 7, 2012 Simon Bird @simonbirdmirror It all went Wonga for #NUFC against #mufc http://www.mirror.co.uk/sport/football/news/newcastle-0-3-man-united-toon-1366564 … View summary Reply Retweet Favorite Joe Kinnear was right about one thing... Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tooj Posted October 7, 2012 Share Posted October 7, 2012 Simon Bird's canny. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
RR15 Posted October 7, 2012 Share Posted October 7, 2012 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Aphrodite Posted October 7, 2012 Share Posted October 7, 2012 Whether they end up sponsoring us or not, they've had shitloads of free publicity this week Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dave Posted October 7, 2012 Share Posted October 7, 2012 Whether they end of sponsoring us or not, they've had shitloads of free publicity this week Ashley will have probably had an invoice drafted up. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest firetotheworks Posted October 7, 2012 Share Posted October 7, 2012 One thing I hate about playing this lot is usually getting beat and our fans think we're scoring points by warbling on how Alan Shearer turned them down. They don't give a s*** and its embarrassing to hear it trotted out with such tedious regularity. With respect mate, you're talking absolute rubbish - it gets trotted out in response to the 'Cheer up Alan Shearer chant'. I agree it's tedious, but it isn't just our lot. Nah not having it. We've been doing it for years and its tosh. I recall 4-1 down in the FA Cup semi final and our fans were singing it as if it proved a point. Second only to the "Shoot!" wankers in the irritation stakes. They've been singing 'Cheer up' for years. I'd rather we sang that back than just sat in silence. I'd rather we just sang pro Newcastle sings tbh. Were you there? We did. The back and forth with the songs was better than the match from 80 mins onwards. We support our local team was the highlight and shut them up briefly. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dave Posted October 7, 2012 Share Posted October 7, 2012 Kind of sad that some of the back pages (including the Journal) are more focussed on this Van Persie elbow business than the comprehensive beating they gave us. Not sure why Pardew needed to bring it up like that in public. As I said before, if the FA want to be clever Pardew could find himself facing a charge of his own for saying it should be looked at. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ashley17 Posted October 7, 2012 Share Posted October 7, 2012 Kind of sad that some of the back pages (including the Journal) are more focussed on this Van Persie elbow business than the comprehensive beating they gave us. Not sure why Pardew needed to bring it up like that in public. As I said before, if the FA want to be clever Pardew could find himself facing a charge of his own for saying it should be looked at. I think Pardew is really bitter about the way ESPN got Cabaye banned last season and wants some consistency. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest BooBoo Posted October 7, 2012 Share Posted October 7, 2012 Distraction I suppose. Silly of Pardew, I would rather he focused on why we started the game so shambolically rather than focus on an incident that had no baring on the result whatsoever. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest firetotheworks Posted October 7, 2012 Share Posted October 7, 2012 Kind of sad that some of the back pages (including the Journal) are more focussed on this Van Persie elbow business than the comprehensive beating they gave us. Not sure why Pardew needed to bring it up like that in public. As I said before, if the FA want to be clever Pardew could find himself facing a charge of his own for saying it should be looked at. My guess is that he probably thought that it would be swept under the carpet if it wasn't mentioned. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Beren Posted October 7, 2012 Share Posted October 7, 2012 This result is really going to fester over the next two weeks. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Interpolic Posted October 7, 2012 Share Posted October 7, 2012 Quote from: Dave on Today at 11:42:16 PMKind of sad that some of the back pages (including the Journal) are more focussed on this Van Persie elbow business than the comprehensive beating they gave us. Not sure why Pardew needed to bring it up like that in public. As I said before, if the FA want to be clever Pardew could find himself facing a charge of his own for saying it should be looked at.<br /><br /><br />My guess is that he probably thought that it would be swept under the carpet if it wasn't mentioned. Yep me too, although he's probably also trying to defelct attention away from the result. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
ohmelads Posted October 7, 2012 Share Posted October 7, 2012 The 4-4-2 and a lack of workrate left us chasing shadows the first 15 minutes and the game was gone before Pardew could change the system. Man U played some excellent football at the start but we put no pressure on the ball. We were not only outplayed in that period but we were also outworked and beaten to every second ball. Pardew needs to scrap the 4-4-2 he keeps trying and go with what suits the players. Once again he changed it midgame but this time it was already too late. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
littlelunchbox Posted October 7, 2012 Share Posted October 7, 2012 honestly lads how different do you really think we would had played had we started in 4-3-3/4-5-1 didn't we try that vs Everton and got our asses handed to us in the first half. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now