Guest icemanblue Posted August 2, 2013 Share Posted August 2, 2013 Ah, cool. Thought it might have been picked up on by now. Promising for us, anyway. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
AyeDubbleYoo Posted August 2, 2013 Share Posted August 2, 2013 Harry is basically talking bollocks anyway. They'll have to loan him or keep him, nobody is going to spend millions on someone who could be going to jail very shortly. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Skirge Posted August 2, 2013 Share Posted August 2, 2013 Newcastle United face competition for QPR striker Loic Remy 2 Aug 2013 08:56 Newcastle United are facing serious competition for the signature of Loic Remy after Tottenham Hotspur put in an inquiry about the French international last night http://www.chroniclelive.co.uk/sport/football/transfer-news/newcastle-united-face-competition-qpr-5430693?utm_source=dlvr.it&utm_medium=twitter Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
midds Posted August 2, 2013 Share Posted August 2, 2013 SSN showing QPR presser live now. May mention the Remy situation. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
TBG Posted August 2, 2013 Share Posted August 2, 2013 I remy hope they do. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest neesy111 Posted August 2, 2013 Share Posted August 2, 2013 I remy hope they do. pls Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
midds Posted August 2, 2013 Share Posted August 2, 2013 Redknapp just mentioned a £2m loan fee for him. Justified it by saying they signed him on a 4 year deal for £8m so that works out at £2m per year so if someone wants to loan him for a year it would be a £2m fee. Or words to that effect anyway. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
healthyaddiction Posted August 2, 2013 Share Posted August 2, 2013 Doesn't rule out loan but says that people should pay £2m for a season loan. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Disco Posted August 2, 2013 Share Posted August 2, 2013 Redknapp on Remy: "If somebody wants to loan him they are entitled to pay £2million for him." Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Insomnium Posted August 2, 2013 Share Posted August 2, 2013 I'm pretty sure Redknapp just said he'd probably play for Brazil in the world cup on SSN. :lol: Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest icemanblue Posted August 2, 2013 Share Posted August 2, 2013 Hefty loan fee was mentioned in the the original reports of us making the offer, wasn't it? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
LRD Posted August 2, 2013 Share Posted August 2, 2013 Redknapp just mentioned a £2m loan fee for him. Justified it by saying they signed him on a 4 year deal for £8m so that works out at £2m per year so if someone wants to loan him for a year it would be a £2m fee. Or words to that effect anyway. Can we have a 25% cut of his next transfer fee then? After all, besides the fee, we will be contributing to his development. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kasper Posted August 2, 2013 Share Posted August 2, 2013 2m loan fee that's payed if he doesnt go to jail & 3-4m agreed transfer fee. Do it. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
AyeDubbleYoo Posted August 2, 2013 Share Posted August 2, 2013 2m loan fee that's payed if he doesnt go to jail & 3-4m agreed transfer fee. Do it. If the loan fee was subtractable from a future transfer fee I think it would be OK. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rocker Posted August 2, 2013 Share Posted August 2, 2013 Yup. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
LRD Posted August 2, 2013 Share Posted August 2, 2013 2m loan fee that's payed if he doesnt go to jail & 3-4m agreed transfer fee. Do it. They want to keep him in the event they get promoted straight up so it's unlikely they fancy an agreed fee. The rape case has sorta played into their hands. If it wasn't for that case, Remy would likely be gone by now. Having said that, without the possibility of a court case we would never have stood a chance with the clubs queuing up for him. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest neesy111 Posted August 2, 2013 Share Posted August 2, 2013 I can see that loan fee being reduced, if they don't get him out on loan soon. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
TaylorJ_01 Posted August 2, 2013 Share Posted August 2, 2013 They'd have to agree a future fee now. Can see him doing quite well then QPR moving the goalposts. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Disco Posted August 2, 2013 Share Posted August 2, 2013 A rare bit of nous show from Knappsy and QPR. Publicly put pressure on anyone wanting him. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kasper Posted August 2, 2013 Share Posted August 2, 2013 2m loan fee that's payed if he doesnt go to jail & 3-4m agreed transfer fee. Do it. They want to keep him in the event they get promoted straight up so it's unlikely they fancy an agreed fee. The rape case has sorta played into their hands. If it wasn't for that case, Remy would likely be gone by now. Having said that, without the possibility of a court case we would never have stood a chance with the clubs queuing up for him. Seems to be a fair bit of conflicting quotes about that first bit. I think a reasonable offer would see them selling him or agreeing a future fee. And for the second part, we already would've signed him in January if it wasn't for QPR's ridiculous wages. Why wouldn't we have stood a chance now? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
AyeDubbleYoo Posted August 2, 2013 Share Posted August 2, 2013 Was wondering that myself.... we nearly signed him once already. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
mrmojorisin75 Posted August 2, 2013 Share Posted August 2, 2013 because he scored a few goals in a shit team so he's proven, i suppose that's the logic Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kasper Posted August 2, 2013 Share Posted August 2, 2013 because he scored a few goals in a shit team so he's proven, i suppose that's the logic I suppose. But to say we wouldnt have stood a chance is crazy. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
LRD Posted August 2, 2013 Share Posted August 2, 2013 because he scored a few goals in a s*** team so he's proven, i suppose that's the logic I suppose. But to say we wouldnt have stood a chance is crazy. He did very well during his half season here. He's good enough for a top 6 team. If there was no case hanging over him there would have been clubs jumping all over to sign him at a fee of 6.8m and probably higher wages than we would have offered. Nothing is absolute, sure but we would have likely been blown straight out of the water by other bids. Bearing in mind too there are many other far more ambitious clubs around us. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dave Posted August 2, 2013 Share Posted August 2, 2013 Still not sure if Redknapp's comments mean anything tbh. Edited the title though, I know everyone loves a bit of that. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now