Figures 1-0 Football Posted February 23, 2016 Share Posted February 23, 2016 Love how their club tried to cover up Johnson touching kiddies because they wanted to survive relegation. How long until we find out that they offered Rolf Harris a place on the physio team? Or Gary Glitter to provide after dinner entertainment Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Pilko Posted February 23, 2016 Share Posted February 23, 2016 http://vignette4.wikia.nocookie.net/en.futurama/images/c/cf/Hyper-Chicken.jpg/revision/latest?cb=20090822141314 "Son, as your lawyer, I declare y'all are in a 12-piece bucket o' trouble." Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Hanshithispantz Posted February 23, 2016 Share Posted February 23, 2016 Love how their club tried to cover up Johnson touching kiddies because they wanted to survive relegation. How long until we find out that they offered Rolf Harris a place on the physio team? Or Gary Glitter to provide after dinner entertainment Mate, our club did nowt when that guy punched a horse, we're just as bad. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
geordie_b Posted February 23, 2016 Share Posted February 23, 2016 Jerry Lawton @JerryLawton 2m2 minutes ago #johnson is shown pic of his exposed manhood - Q "no hair on it?" A "it has been trimmed" - girl alleges it was shaved Adam's Johnson Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Hanshithispantz Posted February 23, 2016 Share Posted February 23, 2016 Jerry Lawton @JerryLawton 2m2 minutes ago #johnson is shown pic of his exposed manhood - Q "no hair on it?" A "it has been trimmed" - girl alleges it was shaved Adam's Johnson you just know for a fact he used this patter on that young lass. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jesse Pinkman Posted February 23, 2016 Share Posted February 23, 2016 To be fair doesn't everyone shave their pubes? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
NUFC_Chris Posted February 23, 2016 Share Posted February 23, 2016 Sounds like a tough day for him, having his todger shown in court. No sympathy for him of course. He sounds like a despicable arsehole even without his apparent tendencies for underage girls. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Figures 1-0 Football Posted February 23, 2016 Share Posted February 23, 2016 Oh, I absolute love this piece... He denies this and said: “Once I went for the kiss, and I hold my hands up for that, I realised this can’t go any further and stopped.” At the point he was licking the tonsils of a 15 year old girl, he suddenly grew some morals and realised that he was acting incorrectly. So he swiftly told the girl and wished her a good day and returned to his normal life. Aye Adam, that is exactly what happened isn't it son :lol: Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
AyeDubbleYoo Posted February 23, 2016 Share Posted February 23, 2016 Wonder how they make a judgement if there's no actual evidence of the sex? Presumably if there was a text saying "cheers for the nosh" they would have raised it straight away. We don't have 'balance of probability" we have "beyond reasonable doubt". Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Figures 1-0 Football Posted February 23, 2016 Share Posted February 23, 2016 Ms Blackwell QC has asked why Johnson only revealed in the witness box that he had to arrive at the Stadium of Light by 6pm after the alleged sexual encounter or that he would be fined if he was late. “I didn’t say everything I should have in the interview,” Johnson said. “It was only after you were convinced that there was no evidence with the prosecution to confirm a time you were driving that you decided to say this,” Ms Blackwell QC said. Johnson claims the meeting between the pair must have ended at 5.35pm in order for him to make it to the Stadium of Light in time for the player’s bus. However messages from the teenager to her friends show that Johnson drove away at 6.08pm. At that same moment Johnson responded to pleading messages from his girlfriend. The prosecution say this shows the player’s encounter with the girl didn’t end until after 6pm. The court heard the teenager Johnson texted the girl to say: “Wasn’t bad was it?” at 6.12pm. The teenager responded “texting and driving eesh,” which the prosecution says proves that he didn’t leave until after 6pm. Oh dear oh dear his lies slowly starting to unravel... Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
AyeDubbleYoo Posted February 23, 2016 Share Posted February 23, 2016 To be fair doesn't everyone shave their pubes? This isn't the criminal bit mate, it's cool. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
BlueStar Posted February 23, 2016 Share Posted February 23, 2016 Sounds like a tough day for him, having his todger shown in court. No sympathy for him of course. He sounds like a despicable arsehole even without his apparent tendencies for underage girls. Surely it gets to the point where when it's going so badly, there's a big screen showing text messages saying you wanted to get a Year 10 lass's jeans off, a text message saying you can't last more than ten seconds without going off and a picture of your cock you're just gonna go "OK, let's just end the trial here, I change my plea to guilty". Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
hithere Posted February 23, 2016 Share Posted February 23, 2016 Just wondering, since RTG have banned mention of it, do you think their posters are reading this instead? Has there been an influx of new members requests that are suspiciously mackemesque? Yes I am I agree with what's being said. Throw the book at him. He's quite clearly not reet in the head. As for Sunderland. If we knew this was coming out and played him anyway, deduct us points. Send us down. Wouldn't put it past Byrne etc. to act this way. Wouldn't be the first time our board have been ridiculous. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
BlueStar Posted February 23, 2016 Share Posted February 23, 2016 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Figures 1-0 Football Posted February 23, 2016 Share Posted February 23, 2016 Sounds like a tough day for him, having his todger shown in court. No sympathy for him of course. He sounds like a despicable arsehole even without his apparent tendencies for underage girls. Surely it gets to the point where when it's going so badly, there's a big screen showing text messages saying you wanted to get a Year 10 lass's jeans off, a text message saying you can't last more than ten seconds without going off and a picture of your cock you're just gonna go "OK, let's just end the trial here, I change my plea to guilty". I'd be mortified if a full courtroom of people were looking at a photo of my penis like, cos I don't really like my penis. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
hithere Posted February 23, 2016 Share Posted February 23, 2016 To be fair doesn't everyone shave their pubes? Shaving is itchy as fuck I do trim it back though in the interest of full disclosure Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Klaus Posted February 23, 2016 Share Posted February 23, 2016 'Her front bottom' Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
NUFC_Chris Posted February 23, 2016 Share Posted February 23, 2016 Ms Blackwell QC has asked why Johnson only revealed in the witness box that he had to arrive at the Stadium of Light by 6pm after the alleged sexual encounter or that he would be fined if he was late. “I didn’t say everything I should have in the interview,” Johnson said. “It was only after you were convinced that there was no evidence with the prosecution to confirm a time you were driving that you decided to say this,” Ms Blackwell QC said. Johnson claims the meeting between the pair must have ended at 5.35pm in order for him to make it to the Stadium of Light in time for the player’s bus. However messages from the teenager to her friends show that Johnson drove away at 6.08pm. At that same moment Johnson responded to pleading messages from his girlfriend. The prosecution say this shows the player’s encounter with the girl didn’t end until after 6pm. The court heard the teenager Johnson texted the girl to say: “Wasn’t bad was it?” at 6.12pm. The teenager responded “texting and driving eesh,” which the prosecution says proves that he didn’t leave until after 6pm. Oh dear oh dear his lies slowly starting to unravel... Tripping over his own tall tales. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
AyeDubbleYoo Posted February 23, 2016 Share Posted February 23, 2016 Sounds like a tough day for him, having his todger shown in court. No sympathy for him of course. He sounds like a despicable arsehole even without his apparent tendencies for underage girls. Surely it gets to the point where when it's going so badly, there's a big screen showing text messages saying you wanted to get a Year 10 lass's jeans off, a text message saying you can't last more than ten seconds without going off and a picture of your cock you're just gonna go "OK, let's just end the trial here, I change my plea to guilty". I'd be mortified if a full courtroom of people were looking at a photo of my penis like, cos I don't really like my penis. I think mine's mint, but I still don't want a room full of people checking it out. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Big Geordie Posted February 23, 2016 Share Posted February 23, 2016 Just wondering, since RTG have banned mention of it, do you think their posters are reading this instead? Has there been an influx of new members requests that are suspiciously mackemesque? Yes I am I agree with what's being said. Throw the book at him. He's quite clearly not reet in the head. As for Sunderland. If we knew this was coming out and played him anyway, deduct us points. Send us down. Wouldn't put it past Byrne etc. to act this way. Wouldn't be the first time our board have been ridiculous. Fair play Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
AyeDubbleYoo Posted February 23, 2016 Share Posted February 23, 2016 'Her front bottom' Has to be the worst euphemism ever, closely followed by 'privates'. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Klaus Posted February 23, 2016 Share Posted February 23, 2016 'Her front bottom' Has to be the worst euphemism ever, closely followed by 'privates'. And 'fairy', now that would have been very creepy Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Shays Given Tim Flowers Posted February 23, 2016 Share Posted February 23, 2016 'Her front bottom' Has to be the worst euphemism ever, closely followed by 'privates'. And 'fairy', now that would have been very creepy http://s7.postimg.org/n0fn5wv6z/image.jpg Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Minhosa Posted February 23, 2016 Share Posted February 23, 2016 Just wondering, since RTG have banned mention of it, do you think their posters are reading this instead? Has there been an influx of new members requests that are suspiciously mackemesque? Yes I am I agree with what's being said. Throw the book at him. He's quite clearly not reet in the head. As for Sunderland. If we knew this was coming out and played him anyway, deduct us points. Send us down. Wouldn't put it past Byrne etc. to act this way. Wouldn't be the first time our board have been ridiculous. The two resident mackems on here are great. I work with another Mackem and he's of the same opinion. He can't believe the lack of stick Sunderland have taken for their handling of the situation. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest palnese Posted February 23, 2016 Share Posted February 23, 2016 Reads like he's being as honest as possible with the already admitted charges so to seem more credible with his denial of the other charges. It's a clear tactic but it could easily backfire. Especially if the jury just think "nonce". Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts