Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Didn't Sunderland suspend him? Then unsuspend him?

 

And now he has only plead guilty after several opportunities to do so, now he has been able to play as many games as possible?

 

It is hard to point fingers at Sunderland as we don't know what they knew. Perhaps the league needs to issue some guidance on when players should and shouldn't be suspended if accused of certain crimes?

Link to post
Share on other sites

I find it pretty shocking he's been allowed to play. I'm not just saying that because it's the mackems. If they've known he was going to plead guilty, why the f*** play him? Unless he's been lying to them all the while. Still shouldn't have been playing regardless imo.

 

This is what I've thought for a long time. Terrible and frightening judgement by Sunderland's management IMO.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Six in a row

Thanks to a paedo

 

Every 0-3 or 6-in-a-row taunt can be met with "oh, ah yeah, 0-3... Di Canio sliding on his knees, oof, bad day that. Say, didn't that convicted paedophile play for you in that match?"

Link to post
Share on other sites

From RTG - Effing hell

 

Haven't read the entire thread but I hope the club sack him as soon as humanly possible. It sickens me that he has played for our club and been defended by our fans when all along he knew what he had done. I'm at work now, but am resisting the urge to drive home and pull down the picture my son has on his wall of him and Johnson after the West Ham game

Link to post
Share on other sites

He'd have got away with it had he admitted fuck all. Now there's a smoking gun and he's admitted to firing but just not hit the target. Pretty straightforward in my eyes to say it went further.

 

Dirty noncing club.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I won't hold Sunderland responsible for Johnson's crimes nor will I judge them on what was probably a difficult decision on whether to back him or sack him.

 

I'm just pleased that he won't be playing the derby and stalking young lasses.

Link to post
Share on other sites

He'd have got away with it had he admitted fuck all. Now there's a smoking gun and he's admitted to firing but just not hit the target. Pretty straightforward in my eyes to say it went further.

 

Dirty noncing club.

I would assume that's not the case. He's not going to admit it if they don't have any evidence

Link to post
Share on other sites

I won't hold Sunderland responsible for Johnson's crimes nor will I judge them on what was probably a difficult decision on whether to back him or sack him.

 

I'm just pleased that he won't be playing the derby and stalking young lasses.

There is a good chance that he will not get a jail sentence though.
Link to post
Share on other sites

He'd have got away with it had he admitted f*** all. Now there's a smoking gun and he's admitted to firing but just not hit the target. Pretty straightforward in my eyes to say it went further.

 

Dirty noncing club.

I would assume that's not the case. He's not going to admit it if they don't have any evidence

 

Exactly.  How the fuck do you come to the conclusion that he would have gotten away with it?  Must have a decent case and some solid evidence.  It's got to crown court and he's pleaded guilty FFS. 

Link to post
Share on other sites

 

I won't hold Sunderland responsible for Johnson's crimes nor will I judge them on what was probably a difficult decision on whether to back him or sack him.

 

I'm just pleased that he won't be playing the derby and stalking young lasses.

There is a good chance that he will not get a jail sentence though.

 

Hopefully just tarred and feathered every day for the rest of his sad, lonely, noncey existence then.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I won't hold Sunderland responsible for Johnson's crimes nor will I judge them on what was probably a difficult decision on whether to back him or sack him.

 

I'm just pleased that he won't be playing the derby and stalking young lasses.

 

If they were genuinely in the dark, it seems odd for them to suspend him then lift the suspension when they were in the shit. It comes across as them wanting to get value out of their wages they were paying when they were in a relegation-shaped hole, overriding their previous judgement which was founded on moral and respectable reasoning.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
×
×
  • Create New...