Thomson Mouse Posted February 25, 2016 Share Posted February 25, 2016 http://i.imgur.com/U1WgnGY.jpg Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Thomson Mouse Posted February 25, 2016 Share Posted February 25, 2016 http://i.imgur.com/h76qgwA.jpg Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Thomson Mouse Posted February 25, 2016 Share Posted February 25, 2016 There's a shit load more on that link KI posted Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
sbnufc Posted February 25, 2016 Share Posted February 25, 2016 uh oh Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest firetotheworks Posted February 25, 2016 Share Posted February 25, 2016 'Stacey being asked by the prosecutor about Johnson's body hair again. She is currently being shown a picture of his groin area. We heard in Johnson's evidence that he took this photograph to show a doctor. Read more: http://www.sunderlandecho.com/live/event#ixzz41B6PbXSq Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Thomson Mouse Posted February 25, 2016 Share Posted February 25, 2016 Defence basically getting her to say he's honest then she starts crumbling under prosecution. OP: "Do you see any future in the relationship that you had?" SF: "Not at the minute I don't, no" Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Fenham Mag Posted February 25, 2016 Share Posted February 25, 2016 Adam Johnsons Barrister: http://www.2harecourt.com/barristers/orlando-pownall-qc/ He's obviously hired someone good but he might as well hired Lionel Hutz the way he is going on. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
sbnufc Posted February 25, 2016 Share Posted February 25, 2016 Adam Johnsons Barrister: http://www.2harecourt.com/barristers/orlando-pownall-qc/ He's obviously hired someone good but he might as well hired Lionel Hutz the way he is going on. :lol: Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
joeyt Posted February 25, 2016 Share Posted February 25, 2016 https://twitter.com/GreggC_CC/lists/aj-trial Good for Twitter users Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Hanshithispantz Posted February 25, 2016 Share Posted February 25, 2016 Defence basically getting her to say he's honest then she starts crumbling under prosecution. OP: "Do you see any future in the relationship that you had?" SF: "Not at the minute I don't, no" What a whore! Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
shintonsghost Posted February 25, 2016 Share Posted February 25, 2016 Defence basically getting her to say he's honest then she starts crumbling under prosecution. OP: "Do you see any future in the relationship that you had?" SF: "Not at the minute I don't, no" What a whore! you use such language against her but not much against the offender? why? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Thomson Mouse Posted February 25, 2016 Share Posted February 25, 2016 Defence basically getting her to say he's honest then she starts crumbling under prosecution. OP: "Do you see any future in the relationship that you had?" SF: "Not at the minute I don't, no" What a whore! you use such language against her but not much against the offender? why? Can't understand the 'at the minute' bit. It's like she's saying I'll see what happens when he gets out. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
shintonsghost Posted February 25, 2016 Share Posted February 25, 2016 Defence basically getting her to say he's honest then she starts crumbling under prosecution. OP: "Do you see any future in the relationship that you had?" SF: "Not at the minute I don't, no" What a whore! you use such language against her but not much against the offender? why? Can't understand the 'at the minute' bit. It's like she's saying I'll see what happens when he gets out. her meal ticket, she doesnt want to lose it man, why the hell would she stand by him after all this shite, guilty or not, money money money Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Hanshithispantz Posted February 25, 2016 Share Posted February 25, 2016 Defence basically getting her to say he's honest then she starts crumbling under prosecution. OP: "Do you see any future in the relationship that you had?" SF: "Not at the minute I don't, no" What a whore! you use such language against her but not much against the offender? why? Because I'm quite obviously taking the piss. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Cookie1892 Posted February 25, 2016 Share Posted February 25, 2016 like someone has said earlier.. the poor lass is watching her life crumble around her and her daughter and natural human instinct is to not give up on that surely Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
ujpest doza Posted February 25, 2016 Share Posted February 25, 2016 Defence basically getting her to say he's honest then she starts crumbling under prosecution. OP: "Do you see any future in the relationship that you had?" SF: "Not at the minute I don't, no" What a whore! you use such language against her but not much against the offender? why? Can't understand the 'at the minute' bit. It's like she's saying I'll see what happens when he gets out. her meal ticket, she doesnt want to lose it man, why the hell would she stand by him after all this shite, guilty or not, money money money From her evidence it would seem her family aren't short of a bob or two anyway. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
loki679 Posted February 25, 2016 Share Posted February 25, 2016 Aye, they're not married so she gets fuck all and she's got a little baby to take care of. Can't blame the lass for waiting to see what happens before throwing away the security for her and her kid. It's always possible that things just haven't been released publicly anarl. I doubt her first instinct is to rush out and tell the press exactly what's happening between them. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mattoon Posted February 25, 2016 Share Posted February 25, 2016 Surely her "defence" of him being honest doesn't hold any water when he's spent their entire relationship cheating on her with "multiple other women (girls?)". I've seen plenty of people stick to bad relationships and go back once cheated on because they "love" that person or want to try and make it work. I think it's unfair to immediately label her a gold digger just because you can't see the world through her eyes. It could very well be just about the money but it could just as easily be about failed human nature, I can't judge. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Hanshithispantz Posted February 25, 2016 Share Posted February 25, 2016 Their bairn too, ultimately we should probably just let her get on with it without calling her a slapper. We know nothing about her. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
1964 Posted February 25, 2016 Share Posted February 25, 2016 I actually have some sympathies with her. She probably believed that she was living the dream, footballers WAG money no object and she now faces being a single mother on child benefit with the stigma of this following her and her daughter for the rest of their lives. From her perspective her (and her daughters) world has fallen apart so for that I feel sorry for her. She has done nothing wrong other than try to keep her dream alive, she may be misguided in that but to crucify her is unnecessary. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
TaylorJ_01 Posted February 25, 2016 Share Posted February 25, 2016 This thread is a shameful pit of obsession. As if you'd all rather he actually badly physically abused the girl rather than be not guilty. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
B-more Mag Posted February 25, 2016 Share Posted February 25, 2016 I can't speak for anyone else, but I know that's what I've been hoping for all along. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Shays Given Tim Flowers Posted February 25, 2016 Share Posted February 25, 2016 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Disco Posted February 25, 2016 Share Posted February 25, 2016 I'm only interested in his seeing his ex-gf suffer. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
1964 Posted February 25, 2016 Share Posted February 25, 2016 This thread is a shameful pit of obsession. As if you'd all rather he actually badly physically abused the girl rather than be not guilty. That's just bollocks by the way, he has already pleaded guilty to grooming, it's the hottest football topic, this is a football forum and it's highly relevant to the area. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts