Mole_Toonfan Posted August 3, 2013 Share Posted August 3, 2013 Chronicle and Journal saying were back in for Bent We'll pull out immediately once we get both Gomis and Remy I guess. I agree which makes it sound like he's a back up to them. I really wish we would have back ups who represent the same style of player as our preferred targets. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest hobshobs Posted August 3, 2013 Share Posted August 3, 2013 I'd rather have Lovenkrands back than Bent. Shola, Viduka, Harewood, Bent. What have we done to deserve this garbage. Harewood did a good job for us in the Championship. Your easily pleased! Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dokko Posted August 3, 2013 Share Posted August 3, 2013 If we are back in for him maybe our thinking is £4m ish transfer if possible is better than nearly £2m in a loan fee. Or Remy has other suitors. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ash Posted August 3, 2013 Share Posted August 3, 2013 Defiantly reckon Bent want's to play for Pardew again and we're his preferred move. Seems odd we'd go back in after what seemed to be such a farcical initial approach. That's good, stick to your guns, hold that opinion no matter what anyone says. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
TRon Posted August 3, 2013 Share Posted August 3, 2013 Chronicle and Journal saying were back in for Bent We'll pull out immediately once we get both Gomis and Remy I guess. I agree which makes it sound like he's a back up to them. I really wish we would have back ups who represent the same style of player as our preferred targets. If the reports are true, then it seems we might be back in for Bent because Remy hasn't committed yet, but I agree, he's not the same type of player at all. Really confused recruiting policy we seem to have. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ronaldo Posted August 3, 2013 Share Posted August 3, 2013 I'd rather have Lovenkrands back than Bent. Shola, Viduka, Harewood, Bent. What have we done to deserve this garbage. You're at it again? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
brummie Posted August 3, 2013 Share Posted August 3, 2013 I'd rather have Lovenkrands back than Bent. Shola, Viduka, Harewood, Bent. What have we done to deserve this garbage. Harewood did a good job for us in the Championship. Ha ha, I'd totally forgotten MFH as we knew him (Marlon Fucking Harewood) had played for you, too. Look on the bright side, at least you didn't pay £4m for him, when you had a team knocking on the door of a CL place, a team who just needed a decent striker. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tiresias Posted August 3, 2013 Share Posted August 3, 2013 I'd rather have Lovenkrands back than Bent. Shola, Viduka, Harewood, Bent. What have we done to deserve this garbage. Harewood did a good job for us in the Championship. Ha ha, I'd totally forgotten MFH as we knew him (Marlon f***ing Harewood) had played for you, too. Look on the bright side, at least you didn't pay £4m for him, when you had a team knocking on the door of a CL place, a team who just needed a decent striker. We did spend £0m on 0 strikers when we were knocking on the door of a CL place in a teak that just needed a decent striker Is it just me or are we in a bit of a striker slump at the moment (league wide)... Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest neesy111 Posted August 3, 2013 Share Posted August 3, 2013 It's defo a lean period for quality strikers in the PL. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Disco Posted August 3, 2013 Share Posted August 3, 2013 It's defo a lean period for quality strikers in the PL. Ridiculous that arguably the best three out and out strikers play in Ligue Un. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dave Posted August 4, 2013 Share Posted August 4, 2013 @skysports_bryan 3m Joe Kinnear on Darren Bent: "We are still in negotiation with Aston Villa. There's a real strong possibility there.." #nufc #avfc Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Yaron Posted August 4, 2013 Share Posted August 4, 2013 I think that he thinks that Gomis is Bent and Bent is Remy Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Stifler Posted August 4, 2013 Share Posted August 4, 2013 @skysports_bryan 3m Joe Kinnear on Darren Bent: "We are still in negotiation with Aston Villa. There's a real strong possibility there.." #nufc #avfc Seems odd, since we bid 2 fucking million. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest neesy111 Posted August 4, 2013 Share Posted August 4, 2013 We'll have to bid more than fucking 2m. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
sempuki Posted August 4, 2013 Share Posted August 4, 2013 JFK obviously can't be trusted. Interesting he did not mention Gomis when that seems the most likely of the three. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Fenham Mag Posted August 4, 2013 Share Posted August 4, 2013 He said he has 'thrashed' out a deal with Bent just in negotiations with Villa. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
ElDiablo Posted August 4, 2013 Share Posted August 4, 2013 Can see us getting Bent & Gomis and leaving Remy. Wouldn't be too disappointed with that. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Alberto2005 Posted August 4, 2013 Share Posted August 4, 2013 Can see us getting Bent & Gomis and leaving Remy. Wouldn't be too disappointed with that. If we get any 2 out of the 3 I'd be very happy. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Cajun Posted August 4, 2013 Share Posted August 4, 2013 I wouldn't be upset but Remy makes much more sense. We should be able to fit Cisse, Gomis and Remy into the same team. Bent would probably be more effective with Gouffran and Ben Arfa either side (ie benching Cisse and Gomis). Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Optimistic Nut Posted August 4, 2013 Share Posted August 4, 2013 Any 3 of Gomis, Cisse, Bent & Remy would be good like. Four would be wankathonic. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dinho lad Posted August 4, 2013 Share Posted August 4, 2013 Minimum is Remy, for me. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
TRon Posted August 4, 2013 Share Posted August 4, 2013 Remy and Gomis for me. I can't see Bent coming here unless we fail to sign either of those two. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mole_Toonfan Posted August 4, 2013 Share Posted August 4, 2013 Remy and Gomis for me. I can't see Bent coming here unless we fail to sign either of those two. That's what i think, we are just covering all bases. ( which would be a first i think ) Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Barnes23 Posted August 4, 2013 Share Posted August 4, 2013 Minimum is Remy, for me. I'd be pretty pleased if Remy was the only player we brought in. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ronaldo Posted August 4, 2013 Share Posted August 4, 2013 Minimum is Remy, for me. I'd be pretty pleased if Remy was the only player we brought in. Easily pleased then. Still one injury away from Jonas or Shola playing in that case. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now