Guest neesy111 Posted July 6, 2017 Share Posted July 6, 2017 If Lukaku goes to Man U then he'll beat Kane to 260 league goals. yeah he was always my worry for shearer's record if he stayed here Already on 85, just turned 24. Not unrealistic to think he'll get regularly around 25-30 a season at a club like Man U. Kane will get it imo. Can see Lukaku going abroad somepoint in the future. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Posted July 6, 2017 Share Posted July 6, 2017 If Lukaku goes to Man U then he'll beat Kane to 260 league goals. yeah he was always my worry for shearer's record if he stayed here Already on 85, just turned 24. Not unrealistic to think he'll get regularly around 25-30 a season at a club like Man U. Kane will get it imo. Can see Lukaku going abroad somepoint in the future. I think Kane's just as likely to end up at someone like Real Madrid. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
lovejoy Posted July 6, 2017 Share Posted July 6, 2017 Reports now that the fee isn't agreed and Chelsea 'very much still in the picture'. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
triggs Posted July 6, 2017 Share Posted July 6, 2017 Controversial but i'm yet to see Lukaku do anything in the big and meaningful games. For 75m, i'd rather test the water at Spurs and place the same bid for Kane to see what response it got. "Fuck off" Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Decky Posted July 6, 2017 Share Posted July 6, 2017 Reports now that the fee isn't agreed and Chelsea 'very much still in the picture'. BBC all over it so I'd say it's most definitely agreed. But Chelsea will probably bid as well. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tooj Posted July 6, 2017 Share Posted July 6, 2017 Lukaku getting stuck with Mourinho again. Sucks for him. He can turn it down you know. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Leazes_End_Mag Posted July 6, 2017 Share Posted July 6, 2017 Reports now that the fee isn't agreed and Chelsea 'very much still in the picture'. BBC all over it so I'd say it's most definitely agreed. But Chelsea will probably bid as well. Everton have said there's no fee agreed. I'd expect them to know more than the BBC. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Decky Posted July 6, 2017 Share Posted July 6, 2017 Reports now that the fee isn't agreed and Chelsea 'very much still in the picture'. BBC all over it so I'd say it's most definitely agreed. But Chelsea will probably bid as well. Everton have said there's no fee agreed. I'd expect them to know more than the BBC. Where's this? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
manorpark Posted July 6, 2017 Share Posted July 6, 2017 Now we know how Everton have been spending so freely. Their 'net spend' this summer will probably be "tuppence". Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mole_Toonfan Posted July 6, 2017 Share Posted July 6, 2017 Controversial but i'm yet to see Lukaku do anything in the big and meaningful games. For 75m, i'd rather test the water at Spurs and place the same bid for Kane to see what response it got. "f*** off" Well he's right about one thing, Kane is better I just don't think Spurs will sell him. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Fenham Mag Posted July 6, 2017 Share Posted July 6, 2017 Roque Mesa to Swansea confirmed - he'll be quality for them. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ryan Posted July 6, 2017 Share Posted July 6, 2017 Roque Mesa to Swansea confirmed - he'll be quality for them. Jealous. We should've been in for him. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
AY Posted July 6, 2017 Share Posted July 6, 2017 If Lukaku goes to Man U then he'll beat Kane to 260 league goals. yeah he was always my worry for shearer's record if he stayed here Already on 85, just turned 24. Not unrealistic to think he'll get regularly around 25-30 a season at a club like Man U. Kane will get it imo. Can see Lukaku going abroad somepoint in the future. Lukaku's problem is that he is a big man and usually their career peak is shorter. Have to adapt his game like Shearer did. Kane is going to break it most likely without injuries Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest palnese Posted July 6, 2017 Share Posted July 6, 2017 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Decky Posted July 6, 2017 Share Posted July 6, 2017 Spurs won't hold on to Kane though and he'll almost certainly have his pick of the big clubs on the continent as well. He could quite easily decide he doesnt want to play for another English club other than Spurs. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mole_Toonfan Posted July 6, 2017 Share Posted July 6, 2017 Spurs won't hold on to Kane though and he'll almost certainly have his pick of the big clubs on the continent as well. He could quite easily decide he doesnt want to play for another English club other than Spurs. I doubt any of the big european clubs will want him, all of them are stocked with better strikers already. Man Yoo seems a very safe bet if he is to leave. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest palnese Posted July 6, 2017 Share Posted July 6, 2017 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
GeordieDazzler Posted July 6, 2017 Share Posted July 6, 2017 Thought Lukaku would go for more than 75 in the current market. Not saying he's worth it, just thought it would be even higher. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
jdckelly Posted July 6, 2017 Share Posted July 6, 2017 Thought Lukaku would go for more than 75 in the current market. Not saying he's worth it, just thought it would be even higher. could be an agreement to keep it "low" to facilitate a move for Rooney? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest firetotheworks Posted July 6, 2017 Share Posted July 6, 2017 Spurs really don't need to sell Kane, like. They're big enough now where they don't have to. It's not like it was with Berbatov, Modric, and Bale, where the money would go into making the squad good enough to challenge for the league. They have that now, the only reason to sell him would be if his head was turned or purely to pocket the profits imo. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Beren Posted July 6, 2017 Share Posted July 6, 2017 Spurs want £200m for Kane, don't they? Or rather, they would only consider letting him go for that. Don't think Lukaku would thrive in a Mourinho set up unless his game comes along. Zlatan can do it because his off the ball awareness movement and technique are superb. Lukaku works best in a system where he is one of many attacking focal points. If Mourinho puts everyone else on "keeping it tight" duty and gives Lukaku plus, say, two other players the responsibility for nicking a goal - that's not a recipe for the consistent success required to win a title IMO. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Astroblack Posted July 6, 2017 Share Posted July 6, 2017 It'd be really strange if Kane went to another league. I think he'd struggle in Spain tbh. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
HawK Posted July 6, 2017 Share Posted July 6, 2017 £75m for Lukaku is low compared with Everton's incoming transfers. (Keane, Pickford). Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Marmoset Posted July 6, 2017 Share Posted July 6, 2017 It'd be really strange if Kane went to another league. I think he'd struggle in Spain tbh. Why? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Klaus Posted July 6, 2017 Share Posted July 6, 2017 The money spent on players nowadays is just mental meanwhile, we have an owner who pays his employees less than minimum wage and makes the pregnant lasses give birth in the bogs. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts