Jump to content

Jack Colback (now a free agent)


Recommended Posts

Guest firetotheworks

Perch is f***ing bobbins, that's why he's playing for an average Championship team.

 

Didn't say he wasn't, but I also think Colback is. However, Perch played well for us when given the job of getting the ball and giving it to someone with better ability, he did that for a good 18 months. Colback has had two matches ffs. Even if he'd looked like Cabaye Mk II it's 2 matches. As it happens he's had 2 matches and looked completely ordinary.

Link to post
Share on other sites

he was back up, that was all, can't say he did well, can't say he did poor.

:lol: fucking hell. You cannot rate a player because he's backup now?

 

Guthrie done what he was asked most of the time which I suspect Colback will do too.

I never said he didn't do what was asked of him, I just said he didn't excel and he didn't let us down. He did do what was asked of him but to say he is better than Colback is a bit much.
Link to post
Share on other sites

Sorry, is Stifler seriously still replying to my posts on here...

And, whats your problem? Your posting on here an opinion, the whole point of being on here is so that people can discuss their opinions. When you make a post saying your opinion you leave the door open for me and anyone else to discuss it. It's up to you to if you want to ignore me but I'm not going to get petty and ignore you or anyone else.
Link to post
Share on other sites

he was back up, that was all, can't say he did well, can't say he did poor.

:lol: fucking hell. You cannot rate a player because he's backup now?

 

Guthrie done what he was asked most of the time which I suspect Colback will do too.

I never said he didn't do what was asked of him, I just said he didn't excel and he didn't let us down. He did do what was asked of him but to say he is better than Colback is a bit much.

It's not though :lol:

 

Colback has played 2 games and he was "areet," his games for Sunderland don't matter at all, if he doesn't do it for us then what's the point?

Link to post
Share on other sites

It's only two games into the season but I think you've already seen what you're going to get with Colback. He's a decent, efficient midfielder, who doesn't make many mistakes but rarely does anything that stands out. I'm still not convinced he's better than what you already had, and if Pardew thinks he's a replacement for Cabaye then he's delusional.

 

Saying that, the ginger **** will probably score against us in December  ;D

He's better than Gosling, but should not be starting

Link to post
Share on other sites

he was back up, that was all, can't say he did well, can't say he did poor.

:lol: fucking hell. You cannot rate a player because he's backup now?

 

Guthrie done what he was asked most of the time which I suspect Colback will do too.

I never said he didn't do what was asked of him, I just said he didn't excel and he didn't let us down. He did do what was asked of him but to say he is better than Colback is a bit much.

It's not though :lol:

 

Colback has played 2 games and he was "areet," his games for Sunderland don't matter at all, if he doesn't do it for us then what's the point?

Ok then, if we are only counting games he's played for us I still think he's better than Guthrie, his two appearances have been good displays. I don't hide away from the fact that he needs to keep his form up, but so far I think he is far more capable and effective than Guthrie was for us. Time will tell if he still is when he's played the same amount of games as Guthrie did.
Link to post
Share on other sites

Guest firetotheworks

Sorry, is Stifler seriously still replying to my posts on here...

And, whats your problem? Your posting on here an opinion, the whole point of being on here is so that people can discuss their opinions. When you make a post saying your opinion you leave the door open for me and anyone else to discuss it. It's up to you to if you want to ignore me but I'm not going to get petty and ignore you or anyone else.

 

If it's up to me to ignore it and you know that I've asked you not to reply to my posts because I don't want to speak to you, then you doing so is either pointless (because you know you won't get a reply to any points you make) or inflammatory (because you know you'll get a reply like this one where I tell you f*** off)

 

No further posts about it, I'm not sullying another thread with this bullshit, just know on record that I won't be bothering with anything that you directly respond to on here, so don't waste your time.

Link to post
Share on other sites

but so far I think he is far more capable and effective than Guthrie was for us

 

:lol: :lol: :lol:

Guthrie was average for us, his best games for us were against significantly weaker opposition. Do you actually want to counter that point or are you just going to sit there posting smilies?
Link to post
Share on other sites

but so far I think he is far more capable and effective than Guthrie was for us

 

:lol: :lol: :lol:

Guthrie was average for us, his best games for us were against significantly weaker opposition. Do you actually want to counter that point or are you just going to sit there posting smilies?

:lol: Ah man, you've got me on the ropes here Stifler.

 

But yeah Guthrie was average for us, not really sure how this supports the theory that Jack Colback has been any better like. Jack Colback's best games for us would come against significantly weaker opposition too if he spent a season in the Championship.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Sorry, is Stifler seriously still replying to my posts on here...

And, whats your problem? Your posting on here an opinion, the whole point of being on here is so that people can discuss their opinions. When you make a post saying your opinion you leave the door open for me and anyone else to discuss it. It's up to you to if you want to ignore me but I'm not going to get petty and ignore you or anyone else.

 

If it's up to me to ignore it and you know that I've asked you not to reply to my posts because I don't want to speak to you, then you doing so is either pointless (because you know you won't get a reply to any points you make) or inflammatory (because you know you'll get a reply a reply like this one where I tell you fuck off)

 

No further posts about it, I'm not sullying another thread with this bullshit, just know on record that I won't be bothering with anything that you directly respond to on here, so don't waste your time.

It's fair enough if you don't want to respond to me, I would suggest you actually do that instead of responding to me and I suggest that you use your ignore function in personal settings so my posts don't appear to you. I'm not going to accept your request to not respond to your posts though, as I have said when people make an opinion on here they are doing so to discuss it, which is one of the main reasons for a forum. If you don't want to discuss your points with me directly then I still have the right to discuss your points with everyone else like I do with other people on this forum.
Link to post
Share on other sites

Sorry, is Stifler seriously still replying to my posts on here...

And, whats your problem? Your posting on here an opinion, the whole point of being on here is so that people can discuss their opinions. When you make a post saying your opinion you leave the door open for me and anyone else to discuss it. It's up to you to if you want to ignore me but I'm not going to get petty and ignore you or anyone else.

 

If it's up to me to ignore it and you know that I've asked you not to reply to my posts because I don't want to speak to you, then you doing so is either pointless (because you know you won't get a reply to any points you make) or inflammatory (because you know you'll get a reply a reply like this one where I tell you fuck off)

 

No further posts about it, I'm not sullying another thread with this bullshit, just know on record that I won't be bothering with anything that you directly respond to on here, so don't waste your time.

It's fair enough if you don't want to respond to me, I would suggest you actually do that instead of responding to me and I suggest that you use your ignore function in personal settings so my posts don't appear to you. I'm not going to accept your request to not respond to your posts though, as I have said when people make an opinion on here they are doing so to discuss it, which is one of the main reasons for a forum. If you don't want to discuss your points with me directly then I still have the right to discuss your points with everyone else like I do with other people on this forum.

 

What are your thoughts about Tesco in Gateshead?

Link to post
Share on other sites

but so far I think he is far more capable and effective than Guthrie was for us

 

:lol: :lol: :lol:

Guthrie was average for us, his best games for us were against significantly weaker opposition. Do you actually want to counter that point or are you just going to sit there posting smilies?

:lol: Ah man, you've got me on the ropes here Stifler.

 

But yeah Guthrie was average for us, not really sure how this supports the theory that Jack Colback has been any better like. Jack Colback's best games for us would come against significantly weaker opposition too if he spent a season in the Championship.

It's the fact that his best games were against weaker opposition and his games against similar strength opposition were only average. We can only judge Guthrie on his performances against similar strength opposition which were average whilst so far it's fair Colback's performances against similar opposition have been above average.
Link to post
Share on other sites

Sorry, is Stifler seriously still replying to my posts on here...

And, whats your problem? Your posting on here an opinion, the whole point of being on here is so that people can discuss their opinions. When you make a post saying your opinion you leave the door open for me and anyone else to discuss it. It's up to you to if you want to ignore me but I'm not going to get petty and ignore you or anyone else.

 

If it's up to me to ignore it and you know that I've asked you not to reply to my posts because I don't want to speak to you, then you doing so is either pointless (because you know you won't get a reply to any points you make) or inflammatory (because you know you'll get a reply a reply like this one where I tell you fuck off)

 

No further posts about it, I'm not sullying another thread with this bullshit, just know on record that I won't be bothering with anything that you directly respond to on here, so don't waste your time.

It's fair enough if you don't want to respond to me, I would suggest you actually do that instead of responding to me and I suggest that you use your ignore function in personal settings so my posts don't appear to you. I'm not going to accept your request to not respond to your posts though, as I have said when people make an opinion on here they are doing so to discuss it, which is one of the main reasons for a forum. If you don't want to discuss your points with me directly then I still have the right to discuss your points with everyone else like I do with other people on this forum.

 

What are your thoughts about Tesco in Gateshead?

It's killed the high street of independent retailers and only really allowed chains to take up a presence with most staff recruited on or just above NMW and on part time or 0 hour contracts. It's good thats it's brightened up Gateshead, but it comes at a price. For me I'm not sure that price is worth paying.
Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...