Ronaldo Posted February 28, 2015 Share Posted February 28, 2015 I think we'll also have to accept that Palace under Pardew are probably better than NUFC under Charver. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest antz1uk Posted February 28, 2015 Share Posted February 28, 2015 i've said it all along, Pardew and Palace are a perfect fit, a nothing club with a nothing manager with zero expectations. they'll win some and lose some, i'm just glad the creep is not associated with my club anymore Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
STM Posted March 1, 2015 Share Posted March 1, 2015 Said on MOTD last night that Allardyce hasn't lost to Pardew in 9 games. Didn't we beat them, Remy and Cabaye scoring. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
U2 Posted March 1, 2015 Share Posted March 1, 2015 Do people reckon we're better off under Carver than Pardew? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
STM Posted March 1, 2015 Share Posted March 1, 2015 Pardew was a virus. Carvers a bad cough. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest antz1uk Posted March 1, 2015 Share Posted March 1, 2015 Do people reckon we're better off under Carver than Pardew? yes! while pardew was here he was a permanent fixture and it looked like noithing was going to move the monumental cunt apart from a miracle, Steve parish was that miracle. anyone now in from pardew is never going to feel anywhere near as permanent, Even if carver got the job full time, it would only be a matter of time until he fucks it up of blows his lid. Pardew was Ashley's perfect man but now he is gone. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
mrmojorisin75 Posted March 1, 2015 Share Posted March 1, 2015 think he'd got more points from the same fixtures, but the main thing for me is there is a tiny shred of hope that they might get someone in. Worth it for me, and I wouldn't have him back This plus Carver has been in charge for 8 games and even the fuckwits who bought Pardew's shit are starting to ask questions so for the first time in years failure might actually be met with the reception it deserves. We are far, far better off without Pardew. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ronaldo Posted March 1, 2015 Share Posted March 1, 2015 We're better off without Pardew, but only because it puts us in the position to appoint someone else. In terms of who'd you want in charge, Carver or Pardew, if your aim was to pick up points over the course of 38 games, it's a different answer. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
mrmojorisin75 Posted March 1, 2015 Share Posted March 1, 2015 We're better off without Pardew, but only because it puts us in the position to appoint someone else. In terms of who'd you want in charge, Carver or Pardew, if your aim was to pick up points over the course of 38 games, it's a different answer. Yeah obvs, but we all know we were doomed to Pardew regardless of football results until he left on his own. For whatever reason the slimy cunt mesmerised great swaths of our support and now that the hypnosis is over we're back in the task world. Every sentence out of carvers mouth is another nail in his coffin. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
The College Dropout Posted March 1, 2015 Share Posted March 1, 2015 We're better off without Pardew, but only because it puts us in the position to appoint someone else. In terms of who'd you want in charge, Carver or Pardew, if your aim was to pick up points over the course of 38 games, it's a different answer. This. And only this. Those trying to say we would be better off with Carver full-time over Pardew are deluded. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dave Posted March 1, 2015 Share Posted March 1, 2015 Who has said that? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Twinport53 Posted March 1, 2015 Share Posted March 1, 2015 Said on MOTD last night that Allardyce hasn't lost to Pardew in 9 games. Didn't we beat them, Remy and Cabaye scoring. Yo Cabs freekick the game before he left for PSG? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
mrmojorisin75 Posted March 1, 2015 Share Posted March 1, 2015 We're better off without Pardew, but only because it puts us in the position to appoint someone else. In terms of who'd you want in charge, Carver or Pardew, if your aim was to pick up points over the course of 38 games, it's a different answer. This. And only this. Those trying to say we would be better off with Carver full-time over Pardew are deluded. what the fuck are you on about man? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
STM Posted March 1, 2015 Share Posted March 1, 2015 Said on MOTD last night that Allardyce hasn't lost to Pardew in 9 games. Didn't we beat them, Remy and Cabaye scoring. Yo Cabs freekick the game before he left for PSG? Aye just looked. We beat them 3-1 last season. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest antz1uk Posted March 1, 2015 Share Posted March 1, 2015 We're better off without Pardew, but only because it puts us in the position to appoint someone else. In terms of who'd you want in charge, Carver or Pardew, if your aim was to pick up points over the course of 38 games, it's a different answer. This. And only this. Those trying to say we would be better off with Carver full-time over Pardew are deluded. there's more chance of Messi signing for us that Carver ever getting a full season of 38 games in charge. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Anderson Posted March 1, 2015 Share Posted March 1, 2015 Said on MOTD last night that Allardyce hasn't lost to Pardew in 9 games. Didn't we beat them, Remy and Cabaye scoring. Yo Cabs freekick the game before he left for PSG? Aye just looked. We beat them 3-1 last season. Aye, was there, probably the last time I gained any enjoyment from watching us. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
The College Dropout Posted March 1, 2015 Share Posted March 1, 2015 We're better off without Pardew, but only because it puts us in the position to appoint someone else. In terms of who'd you want in charge, Carver or Pardew, if your aim was to pick up points over the course of 38 games, it's a different answer. This. And only this. Those trying to say we would be better off with Carver full-time over Pardew are deluded. there's more chance of Messi signing for us that Carver ever getting a full season of 38 games in charge. There's not like. He's "managed" his way out of the job so far. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Twinport53 Posted March 1, 2015 Share Posted March 1, 2015 Carver isn't as tall as Pardew though. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest antz1uk Posted March 1, 2015 Share Posted March 1, 2015 We're better off without Pardew, but only because it puts us in the position to appoint someone else. In terms of who'd you want in charge, Carver or Pardew, if your aim was to pick up points over the course of 38 games, it's a different answer. This. And only this. Those trying to say we would be better off with Carver full-time over Pardew are deluded. there's more chance of Messi signing for us that Carver ever getting a full season of 38 games in charge. There's not like. He's "managed" his way out of the job so far. there is like. like any 'interim' manager he is under zero pressure, he has done what was needed and somehow stumbled across the line, should he get it full time he would NEVER last 38 games, he's already shown he's completely out of his depth. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Vinny Green Balls Posted March 1, 2015 Share Posted March 1, 2015 We're better off without Pardew, but only because it puts us in the position to appoint someone else. In terms of who'd you want in charge, Carver or Pardew, if your aim was to pick up points over the course of 38 games, it's a different answer. This. And only this. Those trying to say we would be better off with Carver full-time over Pardew are deluded. Those straw men are always talking out of their asses. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest lincoln_imp Posted March 2, 2015 Share Posted March 2, 2015 my favourite part of this thread is the slagging off of the english media for being "xenephobic" despite the media having a weekly love in for Mourinho/Pochettino/Van Gall, and the gross irony of this forum slagging off anything that is English, ie English managers, players, commentators. When an English person mispronounces a foreign name, this forum goes into meltdown, when a foreign manager mispronounces an English teams name (Queens Park Raisons) this forum masturbates itself into a frenzy of delight. anglophobia at its finest. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
U2 Posted March 2, 2015 Share Posted March 2, 2015 What a sad act this chump is if that genuinely is his favourite part of the thread. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Darth Crooks Posted March 2, 2015 Share Posted March 2, 2015 WUMing at it's poorest. We call shite as we see it, foreign or no. The only gross irony is that you've clearly trawled this thread. Missed the point of it, the 1000's of posts within it and that by bringing up a mistake made by a foreign managers pronunciation (likely crudely made up) have shown xenophobia in itself. You're likely some EDL type who has turned up as a result of some stick you got at the weekend. Right, you've had your bite. Go masturbate over that. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
TaylorJ_01 Posted March 2, 2015 Share Posted March 2, 2015 English things we have: Moke Williamson John Carver Mike Ashley Lee Charnley Rob Elliot Derek Wright Foreign things we have: Ayoze Perez Papiss Cissé Daryl Janmaat Not Alan Pardew Remy Cabella Pretty much 95% of the English things we have are rubbish. Fuck the English things. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
The College Dropout Posted March 2, 2015 Share Posted March 2, 2015 We're better off without Pardew, but only because it puts us in the position to appoint someone else. In terms of who'd you want in charge, Carver or Pardew, if your aim was to pick up points over the course of 38 games, it's a different answer. This. And only this. Those trying to say we would be better off with Carver full-time over Pardew are deluded. there's more chance of Messi signing for us that Carver ever getting a full season of 38 games in charge. There's not like. He's "managed" his way out of the job so far. there is like. like any 'interim' manager he is under zero pressure, he has done what was needed and somehow stumbled across the line, should he get it full time he would NEVER last 38 games, he's already shown he's completely out of his depth. If he is manager at the start of next season, the season is over. He doesn't need 38 games. That would be another year wasted. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts