Jump to content

Recommended Posts

He kept us treading water and oversaw some terrible records putting us at the brink of being in the bottom three. He didn't do much good either. He is 'symptom' but only in the same way as dying is a symptom of getting your heed chopped off. He wasn't good news.

Link to post
Share on other sites

After skimming TCD's recent guff, I looked back in this thread to see what he had to say about Pardew back when he was doing his "best" with us. Skimming a good 20-30 pages or so from a few different days, I couldn't find a single post from him. I deride two things from that: 1) Halcyon days for the forum because he kept his fat fingers away from a thread and 2) he probably always was a Pardew supporter, and the worst kind who pipes down when he was breaking terrible records left, right and centre and now pops up to tell us how he "wasn't all that bad".

 

The problem is this forum is incredibly hostile to ideas that break with the status quo opinions of a few key posters, and for a good while any post even lightly in favour of pardew on here gets met with a torrent of abuse, and usually completely miss the original point the poster was trying to make.

 

All this talk of TCD being a 'Pardew supporter' when all he's been saying is that the job Pardew did wasn't terrible (it wasn't) and that his time here is a symptom of a much bigger issue that sacking him will do nothing to change (it won't) is ridiculous. I've experienced this as well when even trying to point this out puts you in the line for a torrent of abuse and you just think end up thinking whats the bloody point.

 

in all honesty, when all is said and done, at the end of the day, you're wrong.

 

He was shit. It was terrible. Him leaving did improve things.

 

You are right though in this.There is a problem. Ashley is a cunt and Carver is useless. I'm glad you're able to see this.

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

I'd say relegation form for his final full year, blaming the fans' positivity (and negativity, the next week) for losing points, not to mention being consistently complicit in Ashley's attempts to strip the club of both its soul and assets constitutes a 'terrible' job. Any arsehole who thinks otherwise can go drink a can of petrol.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I'd say relegation form for his final full year, blaming the fans' positivity (and negativity, the next week) for losing points, not to mention being consistently complicit in Ashley's attempts to strip the club of both its soul and assets constitutes a 'terrible' job. Any arsehole who thinks otherwise can go drink a can of petrol.

 

I'm in Total agreement. We need a Welcome Break from this debate. Esso boring.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I'd say relegation form for his final full year, blaming the fans' positivity (and negativity, the next week) for losing points, not to mention being consistently complicit in Ashley's attempts to strip the club of both its soul and assets constitutes a 'terrible' job. Any arsehole who thinks otherwise can go drink a can of petrol.

 

I'm in Total agreement. We need a Welcome Break from this debate. Esso boring.

 

Agreed, continuing this crude debate is fuelish in my eyes.

Link to post
Share on other sites

 

Look at it from this angle: Do you think Pardew could have replicated Garde's success at Lyon?

What success?

 

Well two trophies for a start

 

Don't bother with him.  :lol:

 

Easily the worst poster on here since that Japanese guy 'Inochi' left.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I'd say relegation form for his final full year, blaming the fans' positivity (and negativity, the next week) for losing points, not to mention being consistently complicit in Ashley's attempts to strip the club of both its soul and assets constitutes a 'terrible' job. Any arsehole who thinks otherwise can go drink a can of petrol.

 

I'm in Total agreement. We need a Welcome Break from this debate. Esso boring.

 

Agreed, continuing this crude debate is fuelish in my eyes.

 

Well well well, seems someone's ignited the usual punhouse extravaganza. Oil be off.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I'd say relegation form for his final full year, blaming the fans' positivity (and negativity, the next week) for losing points, not to mention being consistently complicit in Ashley's attempts to strip the club of both its soul and assets constitutes a 'terrible' job. Any arsehole who thinks otherwise can go drink a can of petrol.

 

I'm in Total agreement. We need a Welcome Break from this debate. Esso boring.

 

Agreed, continuing this crude debate is fuelish in my eyes.

 

Well well well, seems someone's ignited the usual punhouse extravaganza. Oil be off.

 

Ah come on. There's no reason to be peed off!

Link to post
Share on other sites

I'd say relegation form for his final full year, blaming the fans' positivity (and negativity, the next week) for losing points, not to mention being consistently complicit in Ashley's attempts to strip the club of both its soul and assets constitutes a 'terrible' job. Any arsehole who thinks otherwise can go drink a can of petrol.

 

I'm in Total agreement. We need a Welcome Break from this debate. Esso boring.

 

Agreed, continuing this crude debate is fuelish in my eyes.

 

I'm sure there's Moto come.

Link to post
Share on other sites

After skimming TCD's recent guff, I looked back in this thread to see what he had to say about Pardew back when he was doing his "best" with us. Skimming a good 20-30 pages or so from a few different days, I couldn't find a single post from him. I deride two things from that: 1) Halcyon days for the forum because he kept his fat fingers away from a thread and 2) he probably always was a Pardew supporter, and the worst kind who pipes down when he was breaking terrible records left, right and centre and now pops up to tell us how he "wasn't all that bad".

 

The problem is this forum is incredibly hostile to ideas that break with the status quo opinions of a few key posters, and for a good while any post even lightly in favour of pardew on here gets met with a torrent of abuse, and usually completely miss the original point the poster was trying to make.

 

All this talk of TCD being a 'Pardew supporter' when all he's been saying is that the job Pardew did wasn't terrible (it wasn't) and that his time here is a symptom of a much bigger issue that sacking him will do nothing to change (it won't) is ridiculous. I've experienced this as well when even trying to point this out puts you in the line for a torrent of abuse and you just think end up thinking whats the bloody point.

 

It's hilarious that they keep calling me a Pardew supporter.

Link to post
Share on other sites

After skimming TCD's recent guff, I looked back in this thread to see what he had to say about Pardew back when he was doing his "best" with us. Skimming a good 20-30 pages or so from a few different days, I couldn't find a single post from him. I deride two things from that: 1) Halcyon days for the forum because he kept his fat fingers away from a thread and 2) he probably always was a Pardew supporter, and the worst kind who pipes down when he was breaking terrible records left, right and centre and now pops up to tell us how he "wasn't all that bad".

 

The problem is this forum is incredibly hostile to ideas that break with the status quo opinions of a few key posters, and for a good while any post even lightly in favour of pardew on here gets met with a torrent of abuse, and usually completely miss the original point the poster was trying to make.

 

All this talk of TCD being a 'Pardew supporter' when all he's been saying is that the job Pardew did wasn't terrible (it wasn't) and that his time here is a symptom of a much bigger issue that sacking him will do nothing to change (it won't) is ridiculous. I've experienced this as well when even trying to point this out puts you in the line for a torrent of abuse and you just think end up thinking whats the bloody point.

 

Someone telling me that Pardew wasn't terrible is like being spat in the face. It's no surprise that people react with hostility to someone defending the person who's helped all but ruin their support. I can't deny that certain posters have influence on rest of the forum.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I agree, it's people off this forum that have made people hate Pardew.

 

Not the four consecutive derby drubbings, not the record breaking runs of defeats, not the complicity of running the club into the ground. No it's all Mick's fault, and Beren, and Interpolic, and Kid Icarus, and Hans, and all the other folk on here with a fucking brain cell going spare.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I agree, it's people off this forum that have made people hate Pardew.

 

Not the four consecutive derby drubbings, not the record breaking runs of defeats, not the complicity of running the club into the ground. No it's all Mick's fault, and Beren, and Interpolic, and Kid Icarus, and Hans, and all the other folk on here with a f***ing brain cell going spare.

 

Aye, we're a set of bastards for corrupting our fellow supporters.  :blush:

Link to post
Share on other sites

After skimming TCD's recent guff, I looked back in this thread to see what he had to say about Pardew back when he was doing his "best" with us. Skimming a good 20-30 pages or so from a few different days, I couldn't find a single post from him. I deride two things from that: 1) Halcyon days for the forum because he kept his fat fingers away from a thread and 2) he probably always was a Pardew supporter, and the worst kind who pipes down when he was breaking terrible records left, right and centre and now pops up to tell us how he "wasn't all that bad".

 

The problem is this forum is incredibly hostile to ideas that break with the status quo opinions of a few key posters, and for a good while any post even lightly in favour of pardew on here gets met with a torrent of abuse, and usually completely miss the original point the poster was trying to make.

 

All this talk of TCD being a 'Pardew supporter' when all he's been saying is that the job Pardew did wasn't terrible (it wasn't) and that his time here is a symptom of a much bigger issue that sacking him will do nothing to change (it won't) is ridiculous. I've experienced this as well when even trying to point this out puts you in the line for a torrent of abuse and you just think end up thinking whats the bloody point.

 

Fuck off!!

Link to post
Share on other sites

I agree, it's people off this forum that have made people hate Pardew.

 

Not the four consecutive derby drubbings, not the record breaking runs of defeats, not the complicity of running the club into the ground. No it's all Mick's fault, and Beren, and Interpolic, and Kid Icarus, and Hans, and all the other folk on here with a fucking brain cell going spare.

 

:lol: Get in, name check.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I agree, it's people off this forum that have made people hate Pardew.

 

Not the four consecutive derby drubbings, not the record breaking runs of defeats, not the complicity of running the club into the ground. No it's all Mick's fault, and Beren, and Interpolic, and Kid Icarus, and Hans, and all the other folk on here with a fucking brain cell going spare.

 

:lol: Get in, name check.

This is like the episode of South Park, I broke the dam.
Link to post
Share on other sites

Guest optimistic nit

After skimming TCD's recent guff, I looked back in this thread to see what he had to say about Pardew back when he was doing his "best" with us. Skimming a good 20-30 pages or so from a few different days, I couldn't find a single post from him. I deride two things from that: 1) Halcyon days for the forum because he kept his fat fingers away from a thread and 2) he probably always was a Pardew supporter, and the worst kind who pipes down when he was breaking terrible records left, right and centre and now pops up to tell us how he "wasn't all that bad".

 

The problem is this forum is incredibly hostile to ideas that break with the status quo opinions of a few key posters, and for a good while any post even lightly in favour of pardew on here gets met with a torrent of abuse, and usually completely miss the original point the poster was trying to make.

 

All this talk of TCD being a 'Pardew supporter' when all he's been saying is that the job Pardew did wasn't terrible (it wasn't) and that his time here is a symptom of a much bigger issue that sacking him will do nothing to change (it won't) is ridiculous. I've experienced this as well when even trying to point this out puts you in the line for a torrent of abuse and you just think end up thinking whats the bloody point.

 

Someone telling me that Pardew wasn't terrible is like being spat in the face. It's no surprise that people react with hostility to someone defending the person who's helped all but ruin their support. I can't deny that certain posters have influence on rest of the forum.

 

If Pardew's time at NUFC was terrible then what classifies as mediocre?

 

Allardyce, Souness and Kinnear were terrible, in terms of where we were when they were hired compared to where we were when they were fired and the antics in between. Pardew was run of the mill.

Link to post
Share on other sites

In the 90 games that Roeder and Allardyce were in charge of NUFC, the team lost 4 games by 3 clear goals or more. They didn't lose a single derby = "terrible"

 

In Alan Pardew's final 90 games, the team lost by that margin 15 times, and lost 4 derbies = "run of the mill"

Link to post
Share on other sites

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
×
×
  • Create New...