Guest scum Posted April 14, 2015 Share Posted April 14, 2015 Filed with Companies House. However they are not ready for inspection. Should be out by the end of today or tomorrow I'd imagine. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Beren Posted April 14, 2015 Share Posted April 14, 2015 Filed with Companies House. However they are not ready for inspection. Should be out by the end of today or tomorrow I'd imagine. Edge of your seat stuff Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
BottledDog Posted April 14, 2015 Share Posted April 14, 2015 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Interpolic Posted April 14, 2015 Share Posted April 14, 2015 Basically 7 cup finals between now and the end of the season then. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Disco Posted April 14, 2015 Share Posted April 14, 2015 "THE ACCOUNTS ARE IN THE TUNNEL" Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
morla84 Posted April 14, 2015 Share Posted April 14, 2015 Meltdown on its way, fuel for the protests. I'll iron my outrage trousers Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Interpolic Posted April 14, 2015 Share Posted April 14, 2015 Maybe they gave that £30m to geordie orphans. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Roger Kint Posted April 14, 2015 Share Posted April 14, 2015 Think the MASH ones are available to download now, might hold some clues if anyone fancies getting them Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
UV Posted April 14, 2015 Share Posted April 14, 2015 From the MASH accounts: http://i.imgur.com/5OhikTl.png As far as I can tell from a quick scan, all the figures in the rest of the accounts are mixed in with his other businesses, so hard to pick anything specific to the club out. One thing is though that there was no impairment on players registrations which is where I expected the missing profit to at least partly have gone. Note these accounts are made up to 30/4/14, so not quite in sync with the club's. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
midds Posted April 14, 2015 Share Posted April 14, 2015 http://i.imgur.com/5OhikTl.png Is that it? It that all the detail they give? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
NG32 Posted April 14, 2015 Share Posted April 14, 2015 So wages are down but the operating cost of the club leaped up by 26%. In Any business this would have people seriously worried. I think we all smell a rat and the money has been hidden in the overall "operating expenses"... Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Interpolic Posted April 14, 2015 Share Posted April 14, 2015 Have they set aside the money for transfers after year-end, and added it to costs somehow? I know the likely answer to that is No but it seems strange that they've referred to it at the end like that, with no other explanation of increased costs. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Conjo Posted April 14, 2015 Share Posted April 14, 2015 So wages are down but the operating cost of the club leaped up by 26%. In Any business this would have people seriously worried. I think we all smell a rat and the money has been hidden in the overall "operating expenses"... I even if wages are down in % compared to turnover, it doesn't necessarily mean that the wages were reduced, they could (and probably have) have increased. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
NG32 Posted April 14, 2015 Share Posted April 14, 2015 So wages are down but the operating cost of the club leaped up by 26%. In Any business this would have people seriously worried. I think we all smell a rat and the money has been hidden in the overall "operating expenses"... I even if wages are down in % compared to turnover, it doesn't necessarily mean that the wages were reduced, they could (and probably have) have increased. By 25 million? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Interpolic Posted April 14, 2015 Share Posted April 14, 2015 Why would wages have increased during those 12 months, when we only signed Remy / L De Jong on loan and IIRC moved a few players on? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Conjo Posted April 14, 2015 Share Posted April 14, 2015 So wages are down but the operating cost of the club leaped up by 26%. In Any business this would have people seriously worried. I think we all smell a rat and the money has been hidden in the overall "operating expenses"... I even if wages are down in % compared to turnover, it doesn't necessarily mean that the wages were reduced, they could (and probably have) have increased. By 25 million? No 64,3% of 102,3 = ~65,8 60,4% of 117,5 = ~71 So, wages have increased by rougly £5,2m. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Anderson Posted April 14, 2015 Share Posted April 14, 2015 Wages increased from £65.8m to £71m according to those figures. Edit: What he said. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
midds Posted April 14, 2015 Share Posted April 14, 2015 Why would wages have increased during those 12 months, when we only signed Remy / L De Jong on loan and IIRC moved a few players on? They'll include a whole year's worth of Sissoko, Debuchy, Haidara et al rather than the previous set of accounts which only included a few months worth of their collective wage? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Interpolic Posted April 14, 2015 Share Posted April 14, 2015 Why would wages have increased during those 12 months, when we only signed Remy / L De Jong on loan and IIRC moved a few players on? They'll include a whole year's worth of Sissoko, Debuchy, Haidara et al rather than the previous set of accounts which only included a few months worth of their collective wage? Ah that's a fair pont. We did lose a few though - Cabaye in Jan, and Simpson, Perch, Harper, Ranger at the start of the season. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Anderson Posted April 14, 2015 Share Posted April 14, 2015 Remy was probably on more than those 4 put together, unless QPR were still paying a chunk of his wage. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Paully Posted April 14, 2015 Share Posted April 14, 2015 http://www.themag.co.uk/2015/04/mike-ashley-mash-holdings-incl-nufc-profits-double-to-542m/ Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
TheHoob Posted April 14, 2015 Share Posted April 14, 2015 Does he own MASH entirely? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
AyeDubbleYoo Posted April 14, 2015 Share Posted April 14, 2015 Aye, he owns 100% of the shares. http://companycheck.co.uk/company/06861426/MASH-HOLDINGS-LIMITED/group-structure#shareholders Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Unbelievable Posted April 14, 2015 Share Posted April 14, 2015 Does he own MASH entirely? The clue is in the name. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ikon Posted April 14, 2015 Share Posted April 14, 2015 Think he's saving up to afford a 6 month backpacking trip in South East Asia before he sells. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now