Jump to content

NUFC kits & merchandise


Ryan

Recommended Posts

2 minutes ago, nufcnick said:

So aggressive sweetie, You can’t just take them to court straight away, you have to go through arbitration first, you have to follow the rules set out first, before you go to court otherwise the court will throw it out 


Did Ashley wait for arbitration with regards to the anti-competition case, nope he didn't.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Fucking ridiculous how you are limited as to what income you can bring in through sponsorships, but owners are allowed to “buy” a club with high interest loans, which are then a liability to the club.

 

Backwards but I suppose not surprising. 

Link to post
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, et tu brute said:


Did Ashley wait for arbitration with regards to the anti-competition case, nope he didn't.

And he didn’t take them to court either, it was a pre hearing to see if the club could take the PL to court, and currently there was no decision of that pre hearing. 

Link to post
Share on other sites

9 minutes ago, JonBez comesock said:

We finished in the middle of the league 

 

Man City / Man United get 60 million ish for short deals

 

We should be able to get 20-25 million 

 

potentially 5-7 million for sleeve sponsor 

 

we could also get a training gear sponsor / stadium sponsor / accommodation partner/sponsor 

 

It all adds up 

No we won’t be able to get £20m+, West Ham have finished above us for years and their sponsorship is worth £10m, there is no way the PL would see a clubs new sponsor of £20M+ that finished in the bottom half of the league as fair value 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Just now, nufcnick said:

And he didn’t take them to court either, it was a pre hearing to see if the club could take the PL to court, and currently there was no decision of that pre hearing. 


So he still went through the process of starting an anti-competition claim and the hearing was heard before the arbitration case was concluded. He didn't wait for arbitration, which it what you were saying had to be done. 

Link to post
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, Rafalove said:

Seems like needless gatekeeping to complain about people wearing a toon top. Even if it looks shit on a particular person st James’ looks ten times better when everyone is there in black and white. Not to mention the money goes in to the clubs revenue streams and increases our transfer budget.

Yeah, as much as I don’t wear football shirts unless I’m playing football, watching a match, or lounging around it, it seems to be a bit of a dickhead move to complain about people getting them.

Lets say these adults didn’t buy a shirt and went to the match, instead you will get people salting them for wearing either Chav like clothes or people going to a football match wearing a smart shirt. There is no way to win really, just look at everyone having a pop at people wearing Stone Island stuff. Again it’s not something that I would personally wear, but just lay off people.

 

On top of this, shirts are likely the biggest non-match revenue a football club makes, buying them helps fund players and wages, alongside everything else going on at clubs. Ok that may not be so much of a case for Premeir League clubs, but for others it’s a huge deal, and even for some Premier League clubs it can be the difference of making 1 more singing or a players wages.

Link to post
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, et tu brute said:


So he still went through the process of starting an anti-competition claim and the hearing was heard before the arbitration case was concluded. He didn't wait for arbitration, which it what you were saying had to be done. 

To which we still don’t know the outcome, for all we know it was going to be thrown out as we hadn’t followed the process as the PL set out. 

 

 

Edited by nufcnick

Link to post
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, nufcnick said:

To which we still don’t know the outcome, for all we know it was going to be thrown out as we hadn’t followed the process as the PL. 

 

You're still wrong though, you said the club had to go through arbitration first. The laws of this land, supersede rules any establishment have in place. 

 

 

Edited by et tu brute

Link to post
Share on other sites

11 minutes ago, nufcnick said:

No we won’t be able to get £20m+, West Ham have finished above us for years and their sponsorship is worth £10m, there is no way the PL would see a clubs new sponsor of £20M+ that finished in the bottom half of the league as fair value 


This just highlights the ridiculousness of the whole thing. We won’t be allowed a sponsorship deal that’s a third of Man City?
 

We appear in the same league, on the same TV channels to the same audience. 

 

I would like to see someone make an argument in court as to why 30% of a their sponsorship deal is too much for us. 
 

If people like West Ham have sold themselves cheap, that’s their lookout. I don’t see how it could possibly be fair to use that as a yardstick for other clubs. 

 

 

Edited by AyeDubbleYoo

Link to post
Share on other sites

Fair value based on what another club someone decides you're bracketed with negotiated for their sponsors.

 

Sounds fine aye :lol:

 

Good luck to the club's below us negotiating their sponsorships to Mike and charners work, yikes.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Even if we do break FFP what are they going to do? Everton have clearly already broken it and there has been no consequence at all and they're continuing to spend. If they can just ignore it then why can't we? You can't pick and choose who and when you apply your bullshit regulations without being ripped apart in the courts. 

Link to post
Share on other sites

19 minutes ago, midds said:

Even if we do break FFP what are they going to do? Everton have clearly already broken it and there has been no consequence at all and they're continuing to spend. If they can just ignore it then why can't we? You can't pick and choose who and when you apply your bullshit regulations without being ripped apart in the courts. 

 

It would be ripped apart in court anyway.. imagine a growing business being stopped from making the same money as a market leader .. wouldn't last two mins 

 

 

Edited by Gaztoon

Link to post
Share on other sites

47 minutes ago, midds said:

Even if we do break FFP what are they going to do? Everton have clearly already broken it and there has been no consequence at all and they're continuing to spend. If they can just ignore it then why can't we? You can't pick and choose who and when you apply your bullshit regulations without being ripped apart in the courts. 

Everton have apparently worked with them as they suffered Covid losses (for which the numbers seem ludicrous) but yeah they could hit us with points deductions and fines 

 

Though if we took the matter to the courts there's no chance it holds up

 

I think the club are going with the less confrontational approach to begin with, if the PL continue to play silly buggers then it might be a case of "rolling our sleeves up"

Link to post
Share on other sites

Just now, Geordie Ahmed said:

Everton have apparently worked with them as they suffered Covid losses (for which the numbers seem ludicrous) but yeah they could hit us with points deductions and fines 

 

Though if we took the matter to the courts there's no chance it holds up

 

I think the club are going with the less confrontational approach to begin with, if the PL continue to play silly buggers then it might be a case of "rolling our sleeves up"

Dusting worselves doon?

Link to post
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, nufcnick said:

No we won’t be able to get £20m+, West Ham have finished above us for years and their sponsorship is worth £10m, there is no way the PL would see a clubs new sponsor of £20M+ that finished in the bottom half of the league as fair value 

 

But it can't just be judged on the previous year's league position.

Link to post
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, Geordie Ahmed said:

Everton have apparently worked with them as they suffered Covid losses (for which the numbers seem ludicrous) but yeah they could hit us with points deductions and fines 

 

Though if we took the matter to the courts there's no chance it holds up

 

I think the club are going with the less confrontational approach to begin with, if the PL continue to play silly buggers then it might be a case of "rolling our sleeves up"

Evertons covid losses are a complete mockery of the allowance given. 

Link to post
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, David Edgar said:

 

But it can't just be judged on the previous year's league position.

Get a Big 4 firm to come up with some very clever algorithm that factors in size of club, number of Nigerian Twitter fans, club branded noodles sold in Singapore etc.

Link to post
Share on other sites

46 minutes ago, nufcnick said:

No we won’t be able to get £20m+, West Ham have finished above us for years and their sponsorship is worth £10m, there is no way the PL would see a clubs new sponsor of £20M+ that finished in the bottom half of the league as fair value 

Are we all not getting ahead of ourselves? We don't know the criteria for fair value, it won't just be league placings. 

Link to post
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Geordie Ahmed said:

It's crazy how they've gotten away with claiming double the losses of any other club 

 

 

I think it’s actually great. What if an economic down turn happens and we decide to write off player trading losses due to unfavourable conditions like they did. Seems like a fantastic little loop hole. 

Link to post
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, macphisto said:

Are we all not getting ahead of ourselves? We don't know the criteria for fair value, it won't just be league placings. 

At the time I'm sure it was said (might have been reports rather than anything official) that it's based on similar level clubs, quite how that is worked out is anyones guess

Link to post
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Geordie Ahmed said:

At the time I'm sure it was said (might have been reports rather than anything official) that it's based on similar level clubs, quite how that is worked out is anyones guess

It is such a rabbit hole and made all the more difficult for us as Ashley years are in no way a reflection of the club. Apart from our crowds, everything was so far below where we would naturally be.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...