nufcnick Posted June 3, 2022 Share Posted June 3, 2022 11 minutes ago, macphisto said: Are we all not getting ahead of ourselves? We don't know the criteria for fair value, it won't just be league placings. You can bet your arse that’s exactly how the PL will view it with us Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
macphisto Posted June 3, 2022 Share Posted June 3, 2022 Just now, nufcnick said: You can bet your arse that’s exactly how the PL will view it with us I'm hoping it's immaterial anyway and we'll attract non-3rd party sponsors; either companies wanting to oil relations with PIF or to target the Saudi market. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Manxst Posted June 3, 2022 Share Posted June 3, 2022 Just now, macphisto said: I'm hoping it's immaterial anyway and we'll attract non-3rd party sponsors; either companies wanting to oil relations with PIF or to target the Saudi market. Sports Direct? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dr Jinx Posted June 3, 2022 Share Posted June 3, 2022 These rules which the “top 6” were so keen to introduce wouldn’t stand up to a legal challenge. Its a free market and as long as a deal isn’t just blatantly taking the piss with rules for linked organisations etc, or for example the club owners funnelling money to a sponsor to be just put back in the club, we should be fine with whatever kind of deal we can get. We’re currently way behind a number of clubs in terms of exposure and recent success so what we can get will be limited for now, we break top 6 or even top 4 and then those deals can be drastically renegotiated. Also if it meant a massive injection of bona fide cash into the club, I wouldn’t be opposed to renaming the stadium, it would have to be done in the most minimal way possible though. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
geordie_b Posted June 3, 2022 Share Posted June 3, 2022 A metric they would likely use and we normally lead in is how many times your games were televised. More games on TV > higher exposure > higher sponsorship Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
JonBez comesock Posted June 4, 2022 Share Posted June 4, 2022 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
JonBez comesock Posted June 4, 2022 Share Posted June 4, 2022 Obviously twitter - so pinch of salt ?? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
JonBez comesock Posted June 4, 2022 Share Posted June 4, 2022 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
JonBez comesock Posted June 4, 2022 Share Posted June 4, 2022 Could be we haven’t had premier league approval for new sponsors ? And as it stands it’s still fun88? Unless things change before release date ?? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
STM Posted June 4, 2022 Share Posted June 4, 2022 I think we have other sponsors lined up but haven't had the OK from the PL. We may have a season with two different sponsors. Once the new one is ratified, we will bin off Fun88. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
JonBez comesock Posted June 4, 2022 Share Posted June 4, 2022 1 minute ago, STM said: I think we have other sponsors lined up but haven't had the OK from the PL. We may have a season with two different sponsors. Once the new one is ratified, we will bin off Fun88. Me too Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
r0cafella Posted June 4, 2022 Share Posted June 4, 2022 If it’s true it’s likely the deal with fun88 is valid through this season. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
gdm Posted June 4, 2022 Share Posted June 4, 2022 As I said a few days ago I don’t think Fun88 will let the deal go easily. They’ll want to milk the deal for as much as possible. Was ridiculous to think the club would just bin it off it doesn’t work like that. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
xLiaaamx Posted June 4, 2022 Share Posted June 4, 2022 They'll have it for a fucking steal right now. Paying miles under the actual value. They'll cling on to it for all they can for as long as they can, which knowing Ashley means a long time probably. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
stozo Posted June 4, 2022 Share Posted June 4, 2022 Just now, r0cafella said: If it’s true it’s likely the deal with fun88 is valid through this season. This. If the Fun88 deal runs for this season then it’s very hard to see another sponsor coming in soon or mid-season. The cost of paying off Fun88 would almost certainly make any gains from a new sponsor marginal at best. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
NE27 Posted June 4, 2022 Share Posted June 4, 2022 1 minute ago, gdm said: As I said a few days ago I don’t think Fun88 will let the deal go easily. They’ll want to milk the deal for as much as possible. Was ridiculous to think the club would just bin it off it doesn’t work like that. Keep the sponsor and make it the colour of the shirt. "What do you mean, your sponsor is on the front?" Pity it's still fun88 as it's always been a rank sponsor tbh, and considering this is advertisement I still couldn't tell you what their company actually does or where it's from Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
et tu brute Posted June 4, 2022 Share Posted June 4, 2022 (edited) That is so very easy to knock up on photoshop. Thought we would know better than take the word of a fan Twitter account with hardly any followers. Personally I would have posted that tweet in the Twitter nonsense thread. Edited June 4, 2022 by et tu brute Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
STM Posted June 4, 2022 Share Posted June 4, 2022 There will be a termination clause, probably that they need to pay a severance fee of some sort. Someone somewhere will have to work put whether its worth doing, based on how much we get off new sponsors. There is also the added complication of not having a CEO through the door yet, who will undoubtedly be the one at the heart of this stuff. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Keegans Export Posted June 4, 2022 Share Posted June 4, 2022 21 minutes ago, JonBez comesock said: Obviously twitter - so pinch of salt ?? I can't find what he claims to have found. Not saying he isn't right, but I'm dubious. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
RS Posted June 4, 2022 Share Posted June 4, 2022 Why would fun88 not be sponsor? They’ll have signed a contract that will be legally binding? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
PauloGeordio Posted June 4, 2022 Share Posted June 4, 2022 3 minutes ago, Keegans Export said: I can't find what he claims to have found. Not saying he isn't right, but I'm dubious. funkdoobiest? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
xLiaaamx Posted June 4, 2022 Share Posted June 4, 2022 I only dislike them so much because they continued the Wonga Blue trend. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
RodneyCisse Posted June 4, 2022 Share Posted June 4, 2022 Anyone else not seeing the water mark over fun88? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
et tu brute Posted June 4, 2022 Share Posted June 4, 2022 1 minute ago, RS said: Why would fun88 not be sponsor? They’ll have signed a contract that will be legally binding? Since you don't know the contract or the length that's a moot point tbh. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
JonBez comesock Posted June 4, 2022 Share Posted June 4, 2022 10 minutes ago, Keegans Export said: I can't find what he claims to have found. Not saying he isn't right, but I'm dubious. If you read the rest of the messages it shows you the words (that are in the coding) Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now