Dave Posted May 23, 2016 Share Posted May 23, 2016 We're basing all of this on a mock up made by a site that is referring to news that only they have from the end of last year. If you look at footyheadlines posts, most of their reveals were based on actual 'leaks' yet ours is just based on info that they took from their own post from 2015. They seemingly have newer information, hence the new picture. If anyone cares to have a look at the comments, there are comments from 5 months ago when the site first put up the story. Only today have they said that picture is a leak of the kit. Sure enough, it might be simillar in design when it's actually revealed but for me, the site is trying to get hits. Look at their other posts and there are actual 'leaks' like a picture or something but it's no leak for ours apart from what they have shown. https://web.archive.org/web/20160415002855/http://www.footyheadlines.com/2015/12/newcastle-uniteds-16-17-home-kit-could-be-classy.html Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Toondave Posted May 23, 2016 Share Posted May 23, 2016 It looks fucking shit. Whoever said it was notts county was spot on. Really not hard to make a decent strip, although I don't think it's entirely Puma's fault. I'm guessing they'll put forward a portfolio of options to whoever makes the decision and whoever that is is probably more concerned about how big the sponsor looks/how cheap it is or some other devaluing criterion. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Collage Posted May 23, 2016 Share Posted May 23, 2016 Notts County's is better actually. http://www.footballkitnews.com/wp-content/uploads/2015/07/Notts-County-Home-Kit-15-16.jpg Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tiotes Witch Doctor Posted May 23, 2016 Share Posted May 23, 2016 3,1,2 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
nufcjb Posted May 23, 2016 Share Posted May 23, 2016 Think it would be better if the black and white are switched, making it more black than white. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kanji Posted May 23, 2016 Share Posted May 23, 2016 We're basing all of this on a mock up made by a site that is referring to news that only they have from the end of last year. If you look at footyheadlines posts, most of their reveals were based on actual 'leaks' yet ours is just based on info that they took from their own post from 2015. They seemingly have newer information, hence the new picture. If anyone cares to have a look at the comments, there are comments from 5 months ago when the site first put up the story. Only today have they said that picture is a leak of the kit. Sure enough, it might be simillar in design when it's actually revealed but for me, the site is trying to get hits. Look at their other posts and there are actual 'leaks' like a picture or something but it's no leak for ours apart from what they have shown. https://web.archive.org/web/20160415002855/http://www.footyheadlines.com/2015/12/newcastle-uniteds-16-17-home-kit-could-be-classy.html Dave I frequent that site a ton, and like I said in another post today - they design/mock up based on pics they've seen, rumors they've heard or whats been described to them if the leaked image is not one of their own sources. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
SEMTEX Posted May 23, 2016 Share Posted May 23, 2016 3,1,2 You'd fuck Jonny Stead before the lass??!? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
mrmojorisin75 Posted May 23, 2016 Share Posted May 23, 2016 3,1,2 You'd fuck Jonny Stead before the lass??!? Ar, nar, not again etc. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Robster Posted May 23, 2016 Share Posted May 23, 2016 3,1,2 You'd fuck Jonny Stead before the lass??!? Uh oh, here we go. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Klaus Posted May 23, 2016 Share Posted May 23, 2016 I thought the rules were clarified Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tiotes Witch Doctor Posted May 23, 2016 Share Posted May 23, 2016 I meant left to right, or did I? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
nufcjb Posted May 23, 2016 Share Posted May 23, 2016 Just went back to page 38 of the thread when Kanji posted the link to the site when the first info about the kit was revealed on the 9th of December 2015 . How the f*** have Puma came up with a Notts County kit for us and at the same time, Dortmund get that better design? Utter w*****s. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
SEMTEX Posted May 23, 2016 Share Posted May 23, 2016 3,1,2 You'd fuck Jonny Stead before the lass??!? Ar, nar, not again etc. am just saying i prefer lasses to jonny stead i dont see whats so contrevorshul Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
GavMcEl Posted May 23, 2016 Share Posted May 23, 2016 That is the kit I would bet my life on it, it's not bad but the gold trim just doesnt make it feel like a newcastle top it, it does look rather lower leaguish... It's probs the nicest Jersey puma have made for us Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Deuce Posted May 23, 2016 Share Posted May 23, 2016 It's not yellow, it's gold. And I'd bet £100 on that being the shirt. Nah it's blue. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Deuce Posted May 23, 2016 Share Posted May 23, 2016 I thought the rules were clarified I'm still not sure what the "other" way is. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
M4 Posted May 23, 2016 Share Posted May 23, 2016 I'm not too displeased about that, if it really is the kit. As far as Puma/Wonga kits go then it could be a lot worse. Plus, I'm never buying anyway so... The patchtastic or unicoloured back will ruin the little good there about it though as ever. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kaizero Posted May 23, 2016 Share Posted May 23, 2016 It's not yellow, it's gold. And I'd bet £100 on that being the shirt. Nah it's blue. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
themanupstairs Posted May 23, 2016 Share Posted May 23, 2016 Notts County's is better actually. http://www.footballkitnews.com/wp-content/uploads/2015/07/Notts-County-Home-Kit-15-16.jpg Sorry like, but it doesn't. They all look like they work at Footlocker. NUFC stripes should be a bit wider than that, but not as wide as the supposed leaks. Mind boggling how they seem to fuck it up every year. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
WarrenBartonCentrePartin Posted May 23, 2016 Share Posted May 23, 2016 No, Footlocker staff look like they play for Notts County. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tiotes Witch Doctor Posted May 23, 2016 Share Posted May 23, 2016 Fucking OI OI Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
RobS Posted May 23, 2016 Share Posted May 23, 2016 love that lol Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Deuce Posted May 23, 2016 Share Posted May 23, 2016 Notts County's is better actually. http://www.footballkitnews.com/wp-content/uploads/2015/07/Notts-County-Home-Kit-15-16.jpg What is that material, satin? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mag_in_NZ Posted May 23, 2016 Share Posted May 23, 2016 f***ing OI OI Luv that... Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Hog Posted May 23, 2016 Share Posted May 23, 2016 I'm more interested in what the away shirt will be like, in the vain hope it will be as stand-out as the flying banana we had last time in the Championship. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now