TBG Posted May 15, 2017 Share Posted May 15, 2017 Dwight, give us your best Bad Luck Brian impression Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest firetotheworks Posted May 15, 2017 Share Posted May 15, 2017 First of all, even with the shite sponsor that's the best kit we've had in about 15 years. Puma has done a mint job and designed what we've all been crying out for for years - simple black and white, no daft bits, no box for the sponsor, stripes on the back, stripes on the sleeves, even red numbers. The way I see it, aye the sponsor's not great, and would have looked fine without the Chinese characters, but the alternative was still Wonga, so why people are going to the extent of whinging, I'm not sure. I'll probably get it, and it'll probably grow on us. Sponsor aside it's a brilliant top. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Stifler Posted May 15, 2017 Share Posted May 15, 2017 First of all, even with the shite sponsor that's the best kit we've had in about 15 years. Puma has done a mint job and designed what we've all been crying out for for years - simple black and white, no daft bits, no box for the sponsor, stripes on the back, stripes on the sleeves, even red numbers. The way I see it, aye the sponsor's not great, and would have looked fine without the Chinese characters, but the alternative was still Wonga, so why people are going to the extent of whinging, I'm not sure. I'll probably get it, and it'll probably grow on us. Sponsor aside it's a brilliant top. If that is it then the sponsor not being red is the only thing to dislike about it really. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
smithywill Posted May 15, 2017 Share Posted May 15, 2017 I think it's photoshopped. This analyser suggests the area where the sponsors logo is has been manipulated in some way. https://www.imageforensic.org/image/72512772-f451-47c0-aadc-f92d8fd61576 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
astraguy Posted May 15, 2017 Share Posted May 15, 2017 Please ditch the Chinese shit then its good Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Minhosa Posted May 15, 2017 Share Posted May 15, 2017 It's black and white and there's no wonga, job done. . I quite like it. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Stifler Posted May 15, 2017 Share Posted May 15, 2017 I think it's photoshopped. This analyser suggests the area where the sponsors logo is has been manipulated in some way. https://www.imageforensic.org/image/72512772-f451-47c0-aadc-f92d8fd61576 The question of how someone would get ahold of an official promo picture also makes it highly likely that it's photoshopped. When short leaks come out it's usually down to photo's from a supplier, not promo pics. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
astraguy Posted May 15, 2017 Share Posted May 15, 2017 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Figures 1-0 Football Posted May 15, 2017 Share Posted May 15, 2017 The sponsor logo lets it down, other than that it is class. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Disco Posted May 15, 2017 Share Posted May 15, 2017 Would be relatively smart with the normal badge and a photo of Chairman Mao as sponsor. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Darth Crooks Posted May 15, 2017 Share Posted May 15, 2017 Always a fan of more black than white. The logo looks off because the sponsor is wank but at least it's not Wonga. Shall be getting one. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
NUFC_Chris Posted May 15, 2017 Share Posted May 15, 2017 I think it's photoshopped. This analyser suggests the area where the sponsors logo is has been manipulated in some way. https://www.imageforensic.org/image/72512772-f451-47c0-aadc-f92d8fd61576 Possibly an actual leaked shot of the kit, prior to any sponsor being agreed, and someone's shopped the fun88 logo on it? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
relámpago blanco Posted May 15, 2017 Share Posted May 15, 2017 I think it's photoshopped. This analyser suggests the area where the sponsors logo is has been manipulated in some way. https://www.imageforensic.org/image/72512772-f451-47c0-aadc-f92d8fd61576 Possibly an actual leaked shot of the kit, prior to any sponsor being agreed, and someone's shopped the fun88 logo on it? That's definately photoshopped on. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
xLiaaamx Posted May 15, 2017 Share Posted May 15, 2017 Gayle was doing those promotional shots for the new crest long before the sponsor was allegedly agreed. Like people have said, it just doesn't look real. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Howaythetoon Posted May 15, 2017 Share Posted May 15, 2017 That isn't the new kit like. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest firetotheworks Posted May 15, 2017 Share Posted May 15, 2017 That isn't the new kit like. I'll bet you 50% of your average post length that it is. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
smithywill Posted May 15, 2017 Share Posted May 15, 2017 Funny how the Fun88 logo used is the same one from the Wikipedia page. https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fun88 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
smithywill Posted May 15, 2017 Share Posted May 15, 2017 When they've previously sponsored football teams they also have a tag line under the logo too. "Sportsbook & Casino" http://www.merawindows.com/wp-content/uploads/2016/08/News_article9_en-US_1.jpg https://oddslifenetstorage.blob.core.windows.net/sbcnews/2014/06/fun88.png Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
ponsaelius Posted May 15, 2017 Share Posted May 15, 2017 Sponsor would look 10x better without the white background. Very naff. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Bard of Byker Posted May 15, 2017 Share Posted May 15, 2017 Fake news. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Howaythetoon Posted May 15, 2017 Share Posted May 15, 2017 That isn't the new kit like. I'll bet you 50% of your average post length that it is. K Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
BlueStar Posted May 15, 2017 Share Posted May 15, 2017 Funny how the Fun88 logo used is the same one from the Wikipedia page. https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fun88 Well aye, because that's their logo. I'd be more interested if someone can find that shot of Gayle before the supposed "photoshop" Every year it gets leaked and every year people say the eventual real kit leak is obviously photoshopped until it's announced and revealed as correct. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest reefatoon Posted May 15, 2017 Share Posted May 15, 2017 Definitely a photoshopped logo. Why would it be white behind the logo on the black stripes? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
nufcjb Posted May 15, 2017 Share Posted May 15, 2017 Funny how the Fun88 logo used is the same one from the Wikipedia page. https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fun88 Well aye, because that's their logo. I'd be more interested if someone can find that shot of Gayle before the supposed "photoshop" Every year it gets leaked and every year people say the eventual real kit leak is obviously photoshopped until it's announced and revealed as correct. Think the kit is real but the logo is disputed. Just looks odd. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
nufcjb Posted May 15, 2017 Share Posted May 15, 2017 Definitely a photoshopped logo. Why would it be white behind the logo on the black stripes? Yup. Saw this too. The bottom part of the letters F and N are black on a black stripe but the top of those letters are white on a black stripe. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now