Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Yakubu should be on the list. Consistently scored goals and did so at a time when the Premier League was actually the best in the world.

 

I agree. In fact I wouldn't mind if he returned to the PL. He's only four goals away from 100.

 

Ballack really wasn't that great when he came to Chelsea. His Best years were behind him by then.

 

Solano should be in there ahead of a few players on that list.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Suarez obviously too high up.

 

Well it depends whether you're judging it on longevity, trophies or quality. If its pure quality/talent he absolutely should be there, possibly even higher.

 

Well then Ronaldo should be #1 right? It's a list of the best PL players, not the best players.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I think they've attempted to be calculate it taking in all those factors into consideration. Obviously this has pitfalls and is nothing approaching a perfect science. I don't think Suarez is too high at all, he is the best #9 in the world and few on that list could claim to have been the best in their positions.

 

FWIW I'd never have Giggs #1, regardless of how long he's been around.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Keane at his best (~95-2001) was immense. Very underrated footballer key to ManU's "swarming" pass and move style in the 90's, great at driving his team forward, hugely consistent at the basics, very good first touch and distribution, rarely made a mistake, and was a touch tackler too - just a brilliant midfield general to have in a great footballing side. Some of his battles with Vieira were legendary, and I'd say Keane won the majority of them from the ones I remember seeing. He was often the heartbeat of his team when they played well, someone frequently involved in buildup play, and it's obvious that his teammates respected his abilities otherwise I doubt they'd have passed to him at every opportunity.

 

Can see why he's not appreciated to be fair. Dislikeable personality and as he stuck to the basics he wasn't a "highlight reels" player. Scholes was nicer on the eye and the more talented footballer, certainly attacking wise, but don't think at his best he ever reached the level of consistent influence Keane did, so whilst Scholes was good over a longer period, adapted better into various roles, and didn't really decline much (unlike Keane), I think peak for peak Keane trumps him. Highly debatable though admittedly.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Beardsley had 2 great PL seasons. That's why he isn't higher.

 

True - Because the criteria is "Premier League's 100 best Players' not 'Best Players who may have graced the Premier League, for however brief a period'. He was undoubtably top ten in his prime (see bolded text) - it just happens most of his prime was pre-premier league.

 

Christ, I feel dirty even typing 'premier league'

 

Newcastle, Everton and Liverpool forward had the knack of making every striker he partnered score more goals than they did without him. Gary Lineker, Andy Cole and Ian Rush were just some of those who lauded his creativity. Technically he was as good a player as any England have produced. Comparisons with the likes Andreas Iniesta and Xavi are not wild ones.
  :smitten:
Link to post
Share on other sites

torygraph

 

:lol: I always call it that at work. It drives them insane and I'm stigmatised as a "socialist" on top of not being a "PROTESTANT" (always in caps). I'm really not doing myself any favours, am I? :lol: Fuck them all. A fellow Eye reader, I expect, so another box ticked for you...

 

Good lad.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Guest firetotheworks

In terms of pure quality vs longevity, then it's Ronaldo, Suarez, Shearer and Henry and everyone else can fuck off tbh.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I say this all of the time, but if you look at players who have played in the Premiership era there's only Schmeichel who is a genuine contender for greatest of all time in his position.

 

Aye true, closest one after that is maybe Ashley Cole?

 

Not fit to clean Maldini's boots. Should consider himself lucky to be mentioned in the same sentence.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I really can't see any answer other than Henry in terms of #1, in terms of longevity, talent, success and just damn straight entertainment i don't see an equal.

 

:thup:

 

Thirded.

Henry could probably still do a job for any of the lower half teams in the table IMO. Certainly better than the shite we've got up front bar Cissé.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...