Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Keeper's entitled to hoy himself towards the ball to try and save it, just an unfortunate collision.

Of course he is, just as an outfielder is entitled to challenge for a 50-50. He shouldn't be exempt from sanction if he misses the ball and catches the man just because he's a keeper.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Keeper's entitled to hoy himself towards the ball to try and save it, just an unfortunate collision.

Of course he is, just as an outfielder is entitled to challenge for a 50-50. He shouldn't be exempt from sanction if he misses the ball and catches the man just because he's a keeper.

 

Agree with this. Same when a keeper jumps with a knee chest height. Should be free to do it, but if he crashes into a striker taking him out which happens a fair bit, it should be dangerous play and a pen Imo.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Keeper's entitled to hoy himself towards the ball to try and save it, just an unfortunate collision.

Of course he is, just as an outfielder is entitled to challenge for a 50-50. He shouldn't be exempt from sanction if he misses the ball and catches the man just because he's a keeper.

 

Agree with this. Same when a keeper jumps with a knee chest height. Should be free to do it, but if he crashes into a striker taking him out which happens a fair bit, it should be dangerous play and a pen Imo.

Like Neuer on Higuain in the last World Cup Final

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

Back in training.

 

Surely back for the Oxford game then. Good news that, got a canny few fixtures coming up in a short period of time so it'll be good to at least have him and Murphy competing for one position until Gayle is back.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...