Jump to content

Recommended Posts

He's a smash hit. He scored 12 in 17 last season for Fulham, now he's 3 in 3.

 

15 goals in 20 games is canny form like tbf.

 

The championship goals mean nowt,  he went and joined the most attacking team in the for the 2nd half of the season and managed to score the same amount of goals as Lewis Grabban got playing for the worst team in the first half of the season.

 

Mitro got 13 PL goals to Grabbans 1. By minutes played that's a 1 in 2 goalscoring record for Mitro in the PL vs a 1 in 10 for Grabban, if you only want to count PL goals.

 

To put things in further perspective, using only NUFC/West Brom minutes in the PL, Mitro's got 1 in 2.5 vs Rondon's 1 in 3.8.

 

In the season we went down, Mitro was directly involved (by scoring or assisting) in 1 out of every 3 NUFC goals.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Said it last season in 2 or 3 years time Mitrovic will be playing at a top, top club whereas Gayle will be at somewhere like Charlton in Division 1 and Joselu at some bizarre club in the Far East.  Whereas Rafa is without a doubt a quality manager and the best since Robson some of his decisions are mind blowing

 

For the record I think mbemba will end up being top class too

Link to post
Share on other sites

The only problem with Rafa selling Mitro was that he wasn't allowed to sign who he wanted to build his own attack. That's the be all and end all of it.

 

Players come and go. Rafa could have kept Mitro but he would have needed to sign top quality players to make it work. In his mind I'm sure that selling Mitro and replacing him was the best and simplest option. And he'd have been right had he got a top quality replacement. But he didn't.

Link to post
Share on other sites

The only problem with Rafa selling Mitro was that he wasn't allowed to sign who he wanted to build his own attack. That's the be all and end all of it.

 

Players come and go. Rafa could have kept Mitro but he would have needed to sign top quality players to make it work. In his mind I'm sure that selling Mitro and replacing him was the best and simplest option. And he'd have been right had he got a top quality replacement. But he didn't.

 

It's been suggested that Rondon was the top target for Rafa mind, although some seem to think it was Plea who knocked us back. So Rafa has got someone up top who he preferred to Mitro, now it's just a case of seeing if it works out.

Link to post
Share on other sites

He's a smash hit. He scored 12 in 17 last season for Fulham, now he's 3 in 3.

 

15 goals in 20 games is canny form like tbf.

 

The championship goals mean nowt,  he went and joined the most attacking team in the for the 2nd half of the season and managed to score the same amount of goals as Lewis Grabban got playing for the worst team in the first half of the season.

 

Mitro got 13 PL goals to Grabbans 1. By minutes played that's a 1 in 2 goalscoring record for Mitro in the PL vs a 1 in 10 for Grabban, if you only want to count PL goals.

 

To put things in further perspective, using only NUFC/West Brom minutes in the PL, Mitro's got 1 in 2.5 vs Rondon's 1 in 3.8.

 

In the season we went down, Mitro was directly involved (by scoring or assisting) in 1 out of every 3 NUFC goals.

 

To put things in even further perspective, you missed the point! :lol: This isn't an issue of Mitro v Grabban ability wise; binnsy's point was the quality of Championship teams. Someone inferior to Mitrovic playing in a worse team than Fulham, managed to score the same amount of goals as him.

 

Again, you're like....

Brian-Regan-Dumb-Look.gif?ssl=1

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

The only problem with Rafa selling Mitro was that he wasn't allowed to sign who he wanted to build his own attack. That's the be all and end all of it.

 

Players come and go. Rafa could have kept Mitro but he would have needed to sign top quality players to make it work. In his mind I'm sure that selling Mitro and replacing him was the best and simplest option. And he'd have been right had he got a top quality replacement. But he didn't.

 

It's been suggested that Rondon was the top target for Rafa mind, although some seem to think it was Plea who knocked us back. So Rafa has got someone up top who he preferred to Mitro, now it's just a case of seeing if it works out.

Yeah but even if that's the case he should have been brought in on day one of the window and we'd maybe be looking at having more than a point right now. They've fucked him/us either way really.
Link to post
Share on other sites

He's a smash hit. He scored 12 in 17 last season for Fulham, now he's 3 in 3.

 

15 goals in 20 games is canny form like tbf.

 

The championship goals mean nowt,  he went and joined the most attacking team in the for the 2nd half of the season and managed to score the same amount of goals as Lewis Grabban got playing for the worst team in the first half of the season.

 

Mitro got 13 PL goals to Grabbans 1. By minutes played that's a 1 in 2 goalscoring record for Mitro in the PL vs a 1 in 10 for Grabban, if you only want to count PL goals.

 

To put things in further perspective, using only NUFC/West Brom minutes in the PL, Mitro's got 1 in 2.5 vs Rondon's 1 in 3.8.

 

In the season we went down, Mitro was directly involved (by scoring or assisting) in 1 out of every 3 NUFC goals.

 

To put things in even further perspective, you missed the point! :lol: This isn't an issue of Mitro v Grabban ability wise; binnsy's point was the quality of Championship teams. Someone inferior to Mitrovic playing in a worse team than Fulham, managed to score the same amount of goals as him.

 

Again, you're like....

Brian-Regan-Dumb-Look.gif?ssl=1

 

 

Binnsy’s point was that Mitro’s not proven in the PL, and that the Championship wasn’t a standard to say he’s proven because of, specifically pointing out Grabban could score the same amount of hoals in an inferior team. Hence I showed examples from Mitro’s time in the PL, versus Grabban’s time in the PL, as well as putting his stats further into context by comparing them to who we replaced him by - thus showing that by all accounts, Mitro’s already fairly proven in the PL as a goalscorer.

Link to post
Share on other sites

He's a smash hit. He scored 12 in 17 last season for Fulham, now he's 3 in 3.

 

15 goals in 20 games is canny form like tbf.

 

The championship goals mean nowt,  he went and joined the most attacking team in the for the 2nd half of the season and managed to score the same amount of goals as Lewis Grabban got playing for the worst team in the first half of the season.

 

Mitro got 13 PL goals to Grabbans 1. By minutes played that's a 1 in 2 goalscoring record for Mitro in the PL vs a 1 in 10 for Grabban, if you only want to count PL goals.

 

To put things in further perspective, using only NUFC/West Brom minutes in the PL, Mitro's got 1 in 2.5 vs Rondon's 1 in 3.8.

 

In the season we went down, Mitro was directly involved (by scoring or assisting) in 1 out of every 3 NUFC goals.

 

To put things in even further perspective, you missed the point! :lol: This isn't an issue of Mitro v Grabban ability wise; binnsy's point was the quality of Championship teams. Someone inferior to Mitrovic playing in a worse team than Fulham, managed to score the same amount of goals as him.

 

Again, you're like....

Brian-Regan-Dumb-Look.gif?ssl=1

 

 

Binnsy’s point was that Mitro’s not proven in the PL, and that the Championship wasn’t a standard to say he’s proven because of, specifically pointing out Grabban could score the same amount of hoals in an inferior team. Hence I showed examples from Mitro’s time in the PL, versus Grabban’s time in the PL, as well as putting his stats further into context by comparing them to who we replaced him by - thus showing that by all accounts, Mitro’s already fairly proven in the PL as a goalscorer.

 

I think that's being a bit generous, if that was the case you would have had a lot more takers when he was up for sale. This season might change that, if he goes on to score 15+ goals this season then I don't think anyone will argue.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Does anyone actually think Mitro will score less than 15 goals this season? Even if he does end up being an all round shit PL striker he will still bang them in this season just because its us.

 

I'd wager a small bet with anyone that Mitro will not only outscore Rondon but also Rondon and Joselu combined.

 

In his one full PL season in an awful relegated McClaren team he managed 9 goals, which again I'm sure is more than Joselu or Rondon have managed in a single PL season with much more time to prove themselves.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Does anyone actually think Mitro will score less than 15 goals this season? Even if he does end up being an all round shit PL striker he will still bang them in this season just because its us.

 

I'd wager a small bet with anyone that Mitro will not only outscore Rondon but also Rondon and Joselu combined.

 

In his one full PL season in an awful relegated McClaren team he managed 9 goals, which again I'm sure is more than Joselu or Rondon have managed in a single PL season with much more time to prove themselves.

 

He might well score 15 goals this season, he's off to a great start, but IMO however shit his contribution to the team might supposedly be, if you score 15 goals you've got to be called a decent Premier striker. Rondon might be a better team player, but a striker is usually judged by his goals at the end of the day.

Link to post
Share on other sites

He's a smash hit. He scored 12 in 17 last season for Fulham, now he's 3 in 3.

 

15 goals in 20 games is canny form like tbf.

 

The championship goals mean nowt,  he went and joined the most attacking team in the for the 2nd half of the season and managed to score the same amount of goals as Lewis Grabban got playing for the worst team in the first half of the season.

 

Mitro got 13 PL goals to Grabbans 1. By minutes played that's a 1 in 2 goalscoring record for Mitro in the PL vs a 1 in 10 for Grabban, if you only want to count PL goals.

 

To put things in further perspective, using only NUFC/West Brom minutes in the PL, Mitro's got 1 in 2.5 vs Rondon's 1 in 3.8.

 

In the season we went down, Mitro was directly involved (by scoring or assisting) in 1 out of every 3 NUFC goals.

 

To put things in even further perspective, you missed the point! :lol: This isn't an issue of Mitro v Grabban ability wise; binnsy's point was the quality of Championship teams. Someone inferior to Mitrovic playing in a worse team than Fulham, managed to score the same amount of goals as him.

 

Again, you're like....

Brian-Regan-Dumb-Look.gif?ssl=1

 

 

Binnsy’s point was that Mitro’s not proven in the PL, and that the Championship wasn’t a standard to say he’s proven because of, specifically pointing out Grabban could score the same amount of hoals in an inferior team. Hence I showed examples from Mitro’s time in the PL, versus Grabban’s time in the PL, as well as putting his stats further into context by comparing them to who we replaced him by - thus showing that by all accounts, Mitro’s already fairly proven in the PL as a goalscorer.

 

I think that's being a bit generous, if that was the case you would have had a lot more takers when he was up for sale. This season might change that, if he goes on to score 15+ goals this season then I don't think anyone will argue.

 

Bit of a pointless argument to be honest. First of all, we don't know who the interested parties were, nor how much they would be willing to pay. Second of all, some players do go for bargain fees/seemingly without competition, even though the player is class.

Link to post
Share on other sites

That post was about the Championship record, clearly, as people were using this as one of his pros (rightly or wrongly, I don't care).

 

You compared him to Grabban's PL record - hardly an appropriate measure. :lol:

 

Again, the argument here is not about the championship goals, it's about Mitro's merit as a success for Fulham and/or his status as a PL striker. If you read through the preceding discussion you can see this. I countered binnsy's argument about the championship goals not proving he is a PL level striker by showcasing his stats as a PL striker. Binnsy's post was directly following up on a post saying Mitro had 15 goals in 20, and that this was good form for a striker. Binnsy's point was that the championship goals didn't matter, which in the context of the discussions means Binnsy doesn't think Mitro's proven anything at PL level yet. This in turn is why I made the argument of comparing his PL merits to the striker Binnsy compared him to in the championship, as well as the striker we replaced him with. This to show the greater context of what he's done so far in his career as a PL striker, to back up my point he's already - at a very young age - proved he can score goals and assist goals at PL level playing for a team that eventually got relegated.

Link to post
Share on other sites

He's a smash hit. He scored 12 in 17 last season for Fulham, now he's 3 in 3.

 

15 goals in 20 games is canny form like tbf.

 

The championship goals mean nowt,  he went and joined the most attacking team in the for the 2nd half of the season and managed to score the same amount of goals as Lewis Grabban got playing for the worst team in the first half of the season.

 

Mitro got 13 PL goals to Grabbans 1. By minutes played that's a 1 in 2 goalscoring record for Mitro in the PL vs a 1 in 10 for Grabban, if you only want to count PL goals.

 

To put things in further perspective, using only NUFC/West Brom minutes in the PL, Mitro's got 1 in 2.5 vs Rondon's 1 in 3.8.

 

In the season we went down, Mitro was directly involved (by scoring or assisting) in 1 out of every 3 NUFC goals.

 

To put things in even further perspective, you missed the point! :lol: This isn't an issue of Mitro v Grabban ability wise; binnsy's point was the quality of Championship teams. Someone inferior to Mitrovic playing in a worse team than Fulham, managed to score the same amount of goals as him.

 

Again, you're like....

Brian-Regan-Dumb-Look.gif?ssl=1

 

 

Binnsy’s point was that Mitro’s not proven in the PL, and that the Championship wasn’t a standard to say he’s proven because of, specifically pointing out Grabban could score the same amount of hoals in an inferior team. Hence I showed examples from Mitro’s time in the PL, versus Grabban’s time in the PL, as well as putting his stats further into context by comparing them to who we replaced him by - thus showing that by all accounts, Mitro’s already fairly proven in the PL as a goalscorer.

 

I think that's being a bit generous, if that was the case you would have had a lot more takers when he was up for sale. This season might change that, if he goes on to score 15+ goals this season then I don't think anyone will argue.

 

Bit of a pointless argument to be honest. First of all, we don't know who the interested parties were, nor how much they would be willing to pay. Second of all, some players do go for bargain fees/seemingly without competition, even though the player is class.

 

Well they tend to go for bargain fees usually because there isn't enough evidence to show they are worth more. I can guarantee that if Mitro scores 20 goals this season his value will go up and more clubs will want to sign him. Mitro wasn't getting game time here so what most clubs will have judged him on is the season he scored 9, and that wasn't enough which is why we were relegated.

Link to post
Share on other sites

He's a smash hit. He scored 12 in 17 last season for Fulham, now he's 3 in 3.

 

15 goals in 20 games is canny form like tbf.

 

The championship goals mean nowt,  he went and joined the most attacking team in the for the 2nd half of the season and managed to score the same amount of goals as Lewis Grabban got playing for the worst team in the first half of the season.

 

Mitro got 13 PL goals to Grabbans 1. By minutes played that's a 1 in 2 goalscoring record for Mitro in the PL vs a 1 in 10 for Grabban, if you only want to count PL goals.

 

To put things in further perspective, using only NUFC/West Brom minutes in the PL, Mitro's got 1 in 2.5 vs Rondon's 1 in 3.8.

 

In the season we went down, Mitro was directly involved (by scoring or assisting) in 1 out of every 3 NUFC goals.

 

To put things in even further perspective, you missed the point! :lol: This isn't an issue of Mitro v Grabban ability wise; binnsy's point was the quality of Championship teams. Someone inferior to Mitrovic playing in a worse team than Fulham, managed to score the same amount of goals as him.

 

Again, you're like....

Brian-Regan-Dumb-Look.gif?ssl=1

 

 

Binnsy’s point was that Mitro’s not proven in the PL, and that the Championship wasn’t a standard to say he’s proven because of, specifically pointing out Grabban could score the same amount of hoals in an inferior team. Hence I showed examples from Mitro’s time in the PL, versus Grabban’s time in the PL, as well as putting his stats further into context by comparing them to who we replaced him by - thus showing that by all accounts, Mitro’s already fairly proven in the PL as a goalscorer.

 

I think that's being a bit generous, if that was the case you would have had a lot more takers when he was up for sale. This season might change that, if he goes on to score 15+ goals this season then I don't think anyone will argue.

 

You can find everywhere that he wanted to join only Fulham and that he didn't want to consider any other clubs.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...