Beren Posted March 24, 2016 Share Posted March 24, 2016 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Deuce Posted March 24, 2016 Share Posted March 24, 2016 Usurping Rolf Harris in every step. He really isn't, and if you don't believe be you should read the judge's sentencing remarks regarding Rolf. 6 years does seem a excessive sentence when you compare it to other cases involving very young children but I have no sympathy for him. I'd be happy if all sentencing for all nonces was increased massively. Johnson has came across as an arrogant tw@t in this trial. You should call yourself Strange Mackem. You try to appear even-handed on here but you come across as a smart arse who tries to deflect responsibility from the role your club played in this whole sorry affair and the true extent of what others apart from Byrne really knew when he was welcomed back into the club. Thousands (if not tens of thousands) of your fans sung in defence of Johnson and if Sunderland forums and social media are reflective then it is not a small minority who still support Johnson and blame the child. Your time would be better spent back on RTG - whatever you're called on there - addressing the weird opinions of your fellow Sunderland fans and the manner in which your club has behaved. such a pathetic crusade some people have undertaken Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Howaythetoon Posted March 24, 2016 Share Posted March 24, 2016 Stray Mackem is one of the best posters on here like so shouldn't be getting any grief over this. As for AJ what a vile excuse for a human being. 6 years seems harsh on the surface of things but it should be more because if he wasn't caught, God knows what he was capable of and how further he would sink into depravity given the revelations about the dog porn. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kanj Posted March 24, 2016 Share Posted March 24, 2016 SO if Sunderland knew of all this crap shouldn't they be subject to punishment for sitting on this info? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Big Geordie Posted March 24, 2016 Share Posted March 24, 2016 HTT again Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mick Posted March 24, 2016 Share Posted March 24, 2016 Anyone still doubt his celebration was mocking MH17? After today, I think he was more likely trying to trick a pigeon down from the roof of the stands. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
cannybagoftudor Posted March 24, 2016 Share Posted March 24, 2016 As a dog owner I am disgusted and hope when he drops the soap in the shower Mr Big roots his canal - all mirth aside he is a fucked up numpty. Hope the girl gets the help she needs. Doesn't matter who he played for - he is just an aberration. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Stray Mackem Posted March 24, 2016 Share Posted March 24, 2016 Anyone still doubt his celebration was mocking MH17? After today, I think he was more likely trying to trick a pigeon down from the roof of the stands. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
David Icke - Son of God Posted March 24, 2016 Share Posted March 24, 2016 http://i.imgur.com/fcHsORy.gif Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
r0cafella Posted March 24, 2016 Share Posted March 24, 2016 Stray Mackem is one of the best posters on here like so shouldn't be getting any grief over this. As for AJ what a vile excuse for a human being. 6 years seems harsh on the surface of things but it should be more because if he wasn't caught, God knows what he was capable of and how further he would sink into depravity given the revelations about the dog porn. He really isnt like. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Bonk Posted March 24, 2016 Share Posted March 24, 2016 His sister is a real piece of work: /status/706508594343186432 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Klaus Posted March 24, 2016 Share Posted March 24, 2016 That Katie fucking Hopkins article man Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Bonk Posted March 24, 2016 Share Posted March 24, 2016 How fucking mental do you have to be? 6 years not enough? He's ruined this poor teenagers life and her family. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Peppe Posted March 24, 2016 Share Posted March 24, 2016 Is this Katie Hopkins an actual retard or is she just saying controversial stuff to be in the spotlight? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Peppe Posted March 24, 2016 Share Posted March 24, 2016 #justiceforjohnson? What fucking justice?! Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sima Posted March 24, 2016 Share Posted March 24, 2016 I've been banned from commenting on that thread over on RTG. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Klaus Posted March 24, 2016 Share Posted March 24, 2016 Is this Katie Hopkins an actual retard or is she just saying controversial stuff to be in the spotlight? The latter, or she had a strange relationship with her father when she was young. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
henke Posted March 24, 2016 Share Posted March 24, 2016 Forgive me for being naive but what the laws on dog bumming? Is it an offense? Is having pictures of it an offense? Did he break the law again or was the pooch just used to beef up the case? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Klaus Posted March 24, 2016 Share Posted March 24, 2016 totally legal mate, fill ya boots Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Stray Mackem Posted March 24, 2016 Share Posted March 24, 2016 I've been banned from commenting on that thread over on RTG. Why? Your input was being supported by many posters. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sima Posted March 24, 2016 Share Posted March 24, 2016 Why? Your input was being supported by many posters. No idea, I can post on other threads but not that one. I guess someone didn't like what I was posting and I probably got reported probably due to being misquoted. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
henke Posted March 24, 2016 Share Posted March 24, 2016 totally legal mate, fill ya boots It's not something I've ever thought about, I mean why on earth would you go near a dogs arse? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Wullie Posted March 24, 2016 Share Posted March 24, 2016 Forgive me for being naive but what the laws on dog bumming? Is it an offense? Is having pictures of it an offense? Did he break the law again or was the pooch just used to beef up the case? Yes and yes. He probably wasn't charged with it because the gravity of the other offences meant they didn't need to. They were pretty much certain to be able to convict on the kissing/grooming given the Whatsapp messages and the admissions in interview. A conviction for possession of extreme porn wouldn't have added anything to the sentence so it will have been deemed not in the public interest to put the extra work into that charge. It doesn't mean he didn't have it - if he was arrested for it, he did have it, it's not exactly the sort of thing you can deny if it's found on your computer, other than dispute how it got there. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
NG32 Posted March 24, 2016 Share Posted March 24, 2016 totally legal mate, fill ya boots It's not something I've ever thought about, I mean why on earth would you go near a dogs arse? Tight. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Klaus Posted March 24, 2016 Share Posted March 24, 2016 FFS Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts