Peppe Posted April 6, 2016 Share Posted April 6, 2016 "I could care less" is a funny one too Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
LV Posted April 6, 2016 Share Posted April 6, 2016 "I could care less" is a funny one too That one drives me mental Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Toondave Posted April 6, 2016 Share Posted April 6, 2016 Heard Descartes used to be an absolute fiend for hiding his workings inside a Flaugnarde, the cheeky bastard. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Open_C Posted April 6, 2016 Share Posted April 6, 2016 Prove, is, in the proof-of-the-pudding expression, used in its original sense of 'test' (see also: proving grounds, proving bread dough). It makes perfect sense read in that context Has somebody already posted that? Couldn't bear to read back[emoji38] Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
bovineblue Posted April 6, 2016 Share Posted April 6, 2016 'Someone's let a cat out' I believe the correct phrase is 'who let the dogs out?' Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
thomas Posted April 6, 2016 Share Posted April 6, 2016 For all intensive purposes he's already gone. Wouldn't be surprised to see these last 7 phoned in. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Superior Acuña Posted April 6, 2016 Share Posted April 6, 2016 For all intensive purposes he's already gone. Wouldn't be surprised to see these last 7 phoned in. Not sure if joke after all the discussion on phrasing, or serious... Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ashley17 Posted April 6, 2016 Share Posted April 6, 2016 What a load of shit as well. Rafa might be the only one in that dressing room who thinks we can stay up Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
AyeDubbleYoo Posted April 6, 2016 Share Posted April 6, 2016 Would be worrying if he phoned in a massive percentage of the games he had when he arrived like. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
thomas Posted April 6, 2016 Share Posted April 6, 2016 For all intensive purposes he's already gone. Wouldn't be surprised to see these last 7 phoned in. Not sure if joke after all the discussion on phrasing, or serious... plz giv benefit of doubt couldn't help myself. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dave Posted April 6, 2016 Share Posted April 6, 2016 For all intensive purposes he's already gone. Wouldn't be surprised to see these last 7 phoned in. Yep, we're a shoe in for relegation now. Not a surprise with all the pre-Madonnas in that fucking dressing room. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Nobody Posted April 6, 2016 Share Posted April 6, 2016 Love 'for all intensive purposes' Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
LV Posted April 6, 2016 Share Posted April 6, 2016 For all intensive purposes he's already gone. Wouldn't be surprised to see these last 7 phoned in. Yep, we're a shoe in for relegation now. Not a surprise with all the pre-Madonnas in that f***ing dressing room. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Marmoset Posted April 7, 2016 Share Posted April 7, 2016 Prove, is, in the proof-of-the-pudding expression, used in its original sense of 'test' (see also: proving grounds, proving bread dough). It makes perfect sense read in that context Has somebody already posted that? Couldn't bear to read back[emoji38] This. Hans is silly. Proof is in the pudding is a fine adaptation. Silly Hans. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Hanshithispantz Posted April 7, 2016 Share Posted April 7, 2016 Open C's post disproves that man! It's "the test is in the pudding" vs "the test of the pudding." I had no idea proof meant test until I read that article like Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Heron Posted April 7, 2016 Share Posted April 7, 2016 'Someone's let a cat out' I believe the correct phrase is 'who let the dogs out?' "Cats out the bag?" Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
mickthemagpie Posted April 7, 2016 Share Posted April 7, 2016 Open C's post disproves that man! It's "the test is in the pudding" vs "the test of the pudding." I had no idea proof meant test until I read that article like As in 'proof reading'. Makes perfect sense really. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Disco Posted April 7, 2016 Share Posted April 7, 2016 Heard Hans is only annoyed because of his chronic diabetes which has left him pudding less for years. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Darth Crooks Posted April 7, 2016 Share Posted April 7, 2016 It's wrong man. Anyway I'm going to tow that line all the way and I think we should nip it in the butt as it's likely one in the same. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Darth Crooks Posted April 7, 2016 Share Posted April 7, 2016 Can you be more pacific? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
lovejoy Posted April 7, 2016 Share Posted April 7, 2016 let's hope we're all as wrong about him staying as we were about him coming in the first place! Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bimpy474 Posted April 7, 2016 Share Posted April 7, 2016 let's hope we're all as wrong about him staying as we were about him coming in the first place! I think it's possible he might stay, but only if he's allowed complete freedom to change things in his view for the future. And that'll be why he probably won't stay. They could have offered him the earth knowing the transfer wndow had shut, buy who you like etc. If we do go down or stay up (unlikely as that is), they'll then be tested at their word and we know just how trustworthy that is. Don't see them suddenly becoming truthful after a near decade of constant lies. Besides, going down is the perfect way to cover the lies they've probably told Rafa about what freedom he would allowed as manager. It'll be all, sorry Rafa we've got to cut cost now because YOU didn't keep us up. Unfortunately for us, there's no cure for being a cunt, and our club is full of them. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
LV Posted April 7, 2016 Share Posted April 7, 2016 I think it'll be Ashley and co who want to let Rafa go to get him off the wage bill if we go down as opposed to Rafa wanting to leave for sure. They are idiots man. It's not rocket surgery, a top manager will eventually achieve good results but all this lot care about is the finances so they'll want some bargain basement also-ran to be head coach. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Skeletor Posted April 7, 2016 Share Posted April 7, 2016 For all intensive purposes he's already gone. Wouldn't be surprised to see these last 7 phoned in. Yep, we're a shoe in for relegation now. Not a surprise with all the pre-Madonnas in that f***ing dressing room. http://images.memes.com/meme/698668 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bimpy474 Posted April 7, 2016 Share Posted April 7, 2016 I think it'll be Ashley and co who want to let Rafa go to get him off the wage bill if we go down as opposed to Rafa wanting to leave for sure. They are idiots man. It's not rocket surgery, a top manager will eventually achieve good results but all this lot care about is the finances so they'll want some bargain basement also-ran to be head coach. Aye spot on and exactly why we're in the mess we're in. Unless Ashley suddenly gets someone else's personality, we're not getting out of any mess until he does sell up. God a quarter of my football supporting life smashed by the utter bellwipe. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts