Wallace Posted October 31, 2016 Share Posted October 31, 2016 Where does the Lascelles rumour originate? Sunday newspapers. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
astraguy Posted October 31, 2016 Share Posted October 31, 2016 fuck selling a young and learning Lascelles hell no Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
jdckelly Posted October 31, 2016 Share Posted October 31, 2016 It's merely speculation but if Chelsea really did come in with a decent offer, it would be more of a draw for Ashley to hang on to him until we are promoted. Lascelles potential value could be far higher than 18m, even taking his playing ability to one side. He's a natural leader and a very good speaker with a certain clean cut look that is a PR departments dream. You forget he's still a kid basically and will have many of his best years ahead of him, his value will only increase. dunno, january market is usually peak value. I like him but he's hardly a world beater imho and the only reason I can think of for Chelsea to sign him is to fill out the english trained quota Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Altamullan Posted October 31, 2016 Share Posted October 31, 2016 I do get the sense he is thick as mince though. Not 'on message'/party line, but nevertheless true. If this, however unkind, is accurate then I'd get shot sharpish: "Stupid is and stupid does..." as in he will be far less likely to improve than someone 'good at learning'. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
joeyt Posted October 31, 2016 Share Posted October 31, 2016 I do get the sense he is thick as mince though. Not 'on message'/party line, but nevertheless true. If this, however unkind, is accurate then I'd get shot sharpish: "Stupid is and stupid does..." as in he will be far less likely to improve than someone 'good at learning'. What on Earth is this nonsense? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mattoon Posted October 31, 2016 Share Posted October 31, 2016 I do get the sense he is thick as mince though. Not 'on message'/party line, but nevertheless true. If this, however unkind, is accurate then I'd get shot sharpish: "Stupid is and stupid does..." as in he will be far less likely to improve than someone 'good at learning'. What on Earth is this nonsense? I feel a little thicker having read that... Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
themanupstairs Posted October 31, 2016 Share Posted October 31, 2016 I do get the sense he is thick as mince though. Not 'on message'/party line, but nevertheless true. If this, however unkind, is accurate then I'd get shot sharpish: "Stupid is and stupid does..." as in he will be far less likely to improve than someone 'good at learning'. Lascelles? Thick? WTF? I highly doubt Benitez would have made him captain at such a young age had he been "thick as mince". Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Deuce Posted November 1, 2016 Share Posted November 1, 2016 I do get the sense he is thick as mince though. Not 'on message'/party line, but nevertheless true. If this, however unkind, is accurate then I'd get shot sharpish: "Stupid is and stupid does..." as in he will be far less likely to improve than someone 'good at learning'. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ronaldo Posted November 1, 2016 Share Posted November 1, 2016 I do get the sense he is thick as mince though. Not 'on message'/party line, but nevertheless true. If this, however unkind, is accurate then I'd get shot sharpish: "Stupid is and stupid does..." as in he will be far less likely to improve than someone 'good at learning'. :lol: It's like you put half of this post (and several others, it has to be said) through Google Translate just for a laugh. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Altamullan Posted November 1, 2016 Share Posted November 1, 2016 I do get the sense he is thick as mince though. Not 'on message'/party line, but nevertheless true. If this, however unkind, is accurate then I'd get shot sharpish: "Stupid is and stupid does..." as in he will be far less likely to improve than someone 'good at learning'. love that! Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Altamullan Posted November 1, 2016 Share Posted November 1, 2016 I do get the sense he is thick as mince though. Not 'on message'/party line, but nevertheless true. If this, however unkind, is accurate then I'd get shot sharpish: "Stupid is and stupid does..." as in he will be far less likely to improve than someone 'good at learning'. :lol: It's like you put half of this post (and several others, it has to be said) through Google Translate just for a laugh. Eez zee pure Ingaleesh you gormless faced Middletonian. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rebellious Posted November 1, 2016 Share Posted November 1, 2016 I do get the sense he is thick as mince though. Not 'on message'/party line, but nevertheless true. If this, however unkind, is accurate then I'd get shot sharpish: "Stupid is and stupid does..." as in he will be far less likely to improve than someone 'good at learning'. You sense he is thick ? How do you do that, Spiderman or Darth Vader ? Probably one of the stupidest posts I`ve read on here in 10-11 years. Even if he was thick it wouldn`t get in the way of him improving as a CB. By your logic Chris Smalling should be the worlds best CB. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Klaus Posted November 1, 2016 Share Posted November 1, 2016 Steven Taylor was a member of mensa iirc and he was utter shit. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ronaldo Posted November 1, 2016 Share Posted November 1, 2016 Imagine. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Fatwax Posted November 1, 2016 Share Posted November 1, 2016 I do get the sense he is thick as mince though. Not 'on message'/party line, but nevertheless true. If this, however unkind, is accurate then I'd get shot sharpish: "Stupid is and stupid does..." as in he will be far less likely to improve than someone 'good at learning'. Lascelles? Thick? WTF? I highly doubt Benitez would have made him captain at such a young age had he been "thick as mince". I taught Lascelles. He isn't thick. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
sempuki Posted November 1, 2016 Share Posted November 1, 2016 Another keeper: https://www.thesun.co.uk/sport/2084818/norwich-and-newcastle-are-chasing-swindon-goalkeeper-lawrence-vigouroux/ Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Lush Vlad Posted November 1, 2016 Share Posted November 1, 2016 I do get the sense he is thick as mince though. Not 'on message'/party line, but nevertheless true. If this, however unkind, is accurate then I'd get shot sharpish: "Stupid is and stupid does..." as in he will be far less likely to improve than someone 'good at learning'. http://www.quickmeme.com/img/f2/f212fd68aeca509fcdbbb675e67ce9276b0d9fa965fa8bb5865c167eccb8b1d9.jpg Couldn't even get the quote right FFS Who is the thick one, again? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
James Posted November 1, 2016 Share Posted November 1, 2016 However hard he tries, Lascelles will never reach the level of GCSE Woodwork laureate Alan Shearer. Get rid. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bimpy474 Posted November 1, 2016 Share Posted November 1, 2016 Slow on the turn, poor passing and to top it all off he's thick. Rafa must be blind not to see that lot. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
joeyt Posted November 1, 2016 Share Posted November 1, 2016 Slow on the turn, poor passing and to top it all off he's thick. Rafa must be blind not to see that lot. His passing isn't very good mind Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest reefatoon Posted November 1, 2016 Share Posted November 1, 2016 Couldn't even pass his GCSE's Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
John P Posted November 1, 2016 Share Posted November 1, 2016 How many 6' 4" centre halves are quick on the turn? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ronaldo Posted November 1, 2016 Share Posted November 1, 2016 Not that I want to contribute to this nonsense but he's nowhere near 6'4" like. Going off the one time I saw him out, anyway. The quickest 2 CBs I've seen are Rio Ferdinand and Sylvain Distin. Both of whom are bigger. Not that it really matters. He'll overcome it as a weakness with experience. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Lotus Posted November 1, 2016 Share Posted November 1, 2016 Not that I want to contribute to this nonsense but he's nowhere near 6'4" like. Going off the one time I saw him out, anyway. The quickest 2 CBs I've seen twice are Rio Ferdinand and Sylvain Distin. Both of whom are bigger. Not that it really matters. He'll overcome it as a weakness with experience. I think Lascelles, Hanley and Clark are all the same height iirc. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Lotus Posted November 1, 2016 Share Posted November 1, 2016 That didn't really add anything to the discussion Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts