danny Posted May 6, 2017 Share Posted May 6, 2017 get Kasper Schmeichel, sell Darlow and Sels, keep Elliot and Woodman What would you do with krul? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sima Posted May 6, 2017 Share Posted May 6, 2017 Get him a haircut. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
danny Posted May 6, 2017 Share Posted May 6, 2017 ;D Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Posted May 6, 2017 Share Posted May 6, 2017 get Kasper Schmeichel, sell Darlow and Sels, keep Elliot and Woodman He's meant to be Man U's main target if De Gea goes. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tooj Posted May 6, 2017 Share Posted May 6, 2017 I thought Guardiola should've went for him instead of Bravo as he's proven over here but his distribution is also excellent. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Leazes_End_Mag Posted May 6, 2017 Share Posted May 6, 2017 Rafa wants Abraham on loan apparently. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest palnese Posted May 6, 2017 Share Posted May 6, 2017 Rafa wants Abraham on loan apparently. Better be with an option to buy, if that's the case. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Posted May 6, 2017 Share Posted May 6, 2017 Why? I never get that. Chelsea may have no intention of selling him. If he can do a job to help us stabilise next season then if it's just for 12 months, I'll take it. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Disco Posted May 6, 2017 Share Posted May 6, 2017 Why? I never get that. Chelsea may have no intention of selling him. If he can do a job to help us stabilise next season then if it's just for 12 months, I'll take it. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
r0cafella Posted May 6, 2017 Share Posted May 6, 2017 Why? I never get that. Chelsea may have no intention of selling him. If he can do a job to help us stabilise next season then if it's just for 12 months, I'll take it. Personally I hate the idea of helping improve other teams players for short term gain. I'd rather we look elsewhere unless we can't afford to. A deal is better than no deal after all. Edited - auto correct. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Posted May 6, 2017 Share Posted May 6, 2017 Why? I never get that. Chelsea may have no intention of selling him. If he can do a job to help us stabilise next season then if it's just for 12 months, I'll take it. Personally I hate the idea of helping improve other teams players for short term game. I'd rather we look elsewhere unless we can't afford to. A deal is better than no deal after all. I'd normally agree. But we've just spent a year in the Championship, after spending £80m the year before. If we can build a squad to stay up comfortably by adding a few like Abraham on loan for a year, so we can spend the money on other areas for the long term, I don't see what the problem is. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest palnese Posted May 6, 2017 Share Posted May 6, 2017 Why? I never get that. Chelsea may have no intention of selling him. If he can do a job to help us stabilise next season then if it's just for 12 months, I'll take it. Personally I hate the idea of helping improve other teams players for short term game. I'd rather we look elsewhere unless we can't afford to. A deal is better than no deal after all. Yep. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mole_Toonfan Posted May 6, 2017 Share Posted May 6, 2017 As if Chelsea are going to use him anyway. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Elliottman Posted May 6, 2017 Share Posted May 6, 2017 Why? I never get that. Chelsea may have no intention of selling him. If he can do a job to help us stabilise next season then if it's just for 12 months, I'll take it. Personally I hate the idea of helping improve other teams players for short term game. I'd rather we look elsewhere unless we can't afford to. A deal is better than no deal after all. I'd normally agree. But we've just spent a year in the Championship, after spending £80m the year before. If we can build a squad to stay up comfortably by adding a few like Abraham on loan for a year, so we can spend the money on other areas for the long term, I don't see what the problem is. Absolutely. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest neesy111 Posted May 6, 2017 Share Posted May 6, 2017 I'm happy to use the loan system if it's for short term gaps while we look for a permanent replacement in a position. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest palnese Posted May 6, 2017 Share Posted May 6, 2017 I wouldn't use one of our two domestic loans on a kid with no top flight experience. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Posted May 6, 2017 Share Posted May 6, 2017 I wouldn't use one of our two domestic loans on a kid with no top flight experience. What experienced players in the Premier League that are proven do you expect clubs just to give us for a season? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest palnese Posted May 6, 2017 Share Posted May 6, 2017 I wouldn't use one of our two domestic loans on a kid with no top flight experience. What experienced players in the Premier League that are proven do you expect clubs just to give us for a season? I've no idea, but we signed Remy a few years back and that turned out okay. Until of course he went to Chelsea as we didn't have an option to buy and and we almost got ourselves relegated the following season. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Posted May 6, 2017 Share Posted May 6, 2017 Remy was from the Championship. Very very rare you get a top class player in those circumstances, and I don't see many knocking about from the teams who will go down who would improve us to that level who'd join on loan. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Skeletor Posted May 6, 2017 Share Posted May 6, 2017 We should put a bid in for Pickford just to wind them up. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest chopey Posted May 6, 2017 Share Posted May 6, 2017 We should put a bid in for Pickford just to wind them up. or help them out of a financial black hole? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
joeyt Posted May 6, 2017 Share Posted May 6, 2017 Why? I never get that. Chelsea may have no intention of selling him. If he can do a job to help us stabilise next season then if it's just for 12 months, I'll take it. Personally I hate the idea of helping improve other teams players for short term game. I'd rather we look elsewhere unless we can't afford to. A deal is better than no deal after all. I'd normally agree. But we've just spent a year in the Championship, after spending £80m the year before. If we can build a squad to stay up comfortably by adding a few like Abraham on loan for a year, so we can spend the money on other areas for the long term, I don't see what the problem is. Feels like we very rarely use the loan system well Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Hughesy Posted May 6, 2017 Share Posted May 6, 2017 Would be absolutely insane to pass up the chance to get Abraham on loan. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Figures 1-0 Football Posted May 6, 2017 Share Posted May 6, 2017 Chelsea have a habit of loaning out their youngsters and selling them foolishly, see Romelu Lukaku and Kevin De Bruyne. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Greg Posted May 6, 2017 Share Posted May 6, 2017 Matić as well. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts