Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Guest firetotheworks

Bournemouth has equalised.

*have

Incorrect, I'm afraid. It's has. It admittedly feels wrong and it's rarely used in that way, I just fancied a change. [emoji38]

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Guest firetotheworks

Bournemouth has equalised.

*have

Incorrect, I'm afraid. It's has.

If you're American, but you aren't

Wrong again. CBA though, Google it yourself.
Link to post
Share on other sites

Bournemouth has equalised.

*have

Incorrect, I'm afraid. It's has.

If you're American, but you aren't

Wrong again. CBA though, Google it yourself.

The singular is never used in England you mentalist :lol:

Link to post
Share on other sites

Guest firetotheworks

Bournemouth has equalised.

*have

Incorrect, I'm afraid. It's has.

If you're American, but you aren't

Wrong again. CBA though, Google it yourself.

The singular is never used in England you mentalist [emoji38]

Please stop, I can't be arsed to debate it and ruin another thread by arguing over inconsequential shite.
Link to post
Share on other sites

Bournemouth has equalised.

*have

Incorrect, I'm afraid. It's has.

If you're American, but you aren't

Wrong again. CBA though, Google it yourself.

The singular is never used in England you mentalist [emoji38]

Please stop, I can't be arsed to debate it and ruin another thread by arguing over inconsequential shite.

Ok, just say have next time

Link to post
Share on other sites

Guest firetotheworks

Bournemouth has equalised.

*have

Incorrect, I'm afraid. It's has.

If you're American, but you aren't

Wrong again. CBA though, Google it yourself.

The singular is never used in England you mentalist [emoji38]

Please stop, I can't be arsed to debate it and ruin another thread by arguing over inconsequential shite.

Ok, just say have next time

Nah, you're areet.
Link to post
Share on other sites

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
×
×
  • Create New...