Jump to content

Other clubs' transfers


Greg

Recommended Posts

1 minute ago, Optimistic Nut said:

Just downright lying as well. They had the second biggest spend after Chelsea and only recouped £12m or so. 

Remember, the narrative is the glazers are terrible owners who don’t spend money, as bad if not worst than Ashley. 

Link to post
Share on other sites

You boys would do well to read the article. :lol: It's click bait, and he was talking about the January transfer window. 

 

Arsenal spent £61m on Jorginho, Kiwior and Trossard.

Chelsea spent £269m on Fernandez, Fofana, Badiashile, Mudryk, Madueke and another £21m for Joao Felix in a loan fee and wages.

Liverpool spent £37m on Gakpo

Newcastle spent £45m on Gordon

 

We got Sabitzer and Weghorst on loan. 

Link to post
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Froggy said:

You boys would do well to read the article. :lol: It's click bait, and he was talking about the January transfer window. 

 

Arsenal spent £61m on Jorginho, Kiwior and Trossard.

Chelsea spent £269m on Fernandez, Fofana, Badiashile, Mudryk, Madueke and another £21m for Joao Felix in a loan fee and wages.

Liverpool spent £37m on Gakpo

Newcastle spent £45m on Gordon

 

We got Sabitzer and Weghorst on loan. 

Aka spunked your load in the summer. 

Link to post
Share on other sites

9 minutes ago, Froggy said:

You boys would do well to read the article. :lol: It's click bait, and he was talking about the January transfer window. 

 

Arsenal spent £61m on Jorginho, Kiwior and Trossard.

Chelsea spent £269m on Fernandez, Fofana, Badiashile, Mudryk, Madueke and another £21m for Joao Felix in a loan fee and wages.

Liverpool spent £37m on Gakpo

Newcastle spent £45m on Gordon

 

We got Sabitzer and Weghorst on loan. 

 

Ah, right. So loaning two players worth about £30-40m combined means he didn't strengthen then. 

Link to post
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, Optimistic Nut said:

 

Ah, right. So loaning two players worth about £30-40m combined means he didn't strengthen then. 

 

What planet are you on? :lol: Sabitzer's fee to make permanent is £18m so both players combined is about £18m

 

Call it arrogance or call it whatever you want, we're a big enough club that the manager should be able to go out and buy a striker in January and not have to loan players who couldn't even make it at Burnley. We were in all competitions and needed more players. We had lost Ronaldo and were saving £2m a month in wages. Zero excuses.

Link to post
Share on other sites

45/60/35m Is “huge investments? “. Arsenal got 3 players for that 65m, whereas ETH spunked 100m on one at the start of the season. It’s completely disingenuous nonsense. Liverpool played a significant amount of games with Curtis Jones, and Harvey Elliott.

 

The fact he’s constructing some sort of “poor old us underdogs beat the odds ?” narrative is complete nonsense 

 

 

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

MacAllister in the Henderson role. Liverpool’s midfield has desperately needed a bit of a revamp for a couple of seasons now. They’ve seemed pretty  lazy make shift signings during that time. They could do another signing in midfield to go along with MacAllister.

Link to post
Share on other sites

12 minutes ago, Tsunami said:

MacAllister in the Henderson role. Liverpool’s midfield has desperately needed a bit of a revamp for a couple of seasons now. They’ve seemed pretty  lazy make shift signings during that time. They could do another signing in midfield to go along with MacAllister.

Meh I don’t the Macallister is all that 

he’s good but think he will flop 

Link to post
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, r0cafella said:

Remember, the narrative is the glazers are terrible owners who don’t spend money, as bad if not worst than Ashley. 


 

 

It’s a completely fair narrative. They’ve taken something like a billion out the club. Fair enough they have spent loads on transfers. They’ve spent it on shit though which ultimately is down to the ownership. The stadium, training facilities and club infrastructure in general is lagging behind what a club like Manchester United should have. The Glaziers are thief’s pure and simple.

Link to post
Share on other sites

43 minutes ago, Rafalove said:

It’s a completely fair narrative. They’ve taken something like a billion out the club. Fair enough they have spent loads on transfers. They’ve spent it on shit though which ultimately is down to the ownership. The stadium, training facilities and club infrastructure in general is lagging behind what a club like Manchester United should have. The Glaziers are thief’s pure and simple.

 

:love:

Link to post
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, Rafalove said:


 

 

It’s a completely fair narrative. They’ve taken something like a billion out the club. Fair enough they have spent loads on transfers. They’ve spent it on shit though which ultimately is down to the ownership. The stadium, training facilities and club infrastructure in general is lagging behind what a club like Manchester United should have. The Glaziers are thief’s pure and simple.

They’ve also generated billions in revenue whilst making sure they kept up spending with the biggest clubs in the world. You clearly don’t recall how Ashley ran is if you believe they are at all comparable. 

Link to post
Share on other sites

I didn’t mention Ashley. Though they are comparable. The major difference being the Glaziers actually having the sense to grow the clubs income. This is nothing special though as Manchester United have always been one of the clubs with the highest revenue, and have arguably the largest fanbase in the world.

 

 

I mean Sir John Hall is the most successful owner we have had since the fifties, but a lot of fans still don’t like him because he took money out the club. Sums which would be absolute peanuts compared to what the Glaziers took out in the hundred of thousands realm if I’m not mistaken.

 

 

 

 

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...