Jump to content

Recommended Posts

I know Botman is the shiny new toy, and has a much higher ceiling and will likely become better than Schar, but Schar as been the better CB this season. By a margin. Not that Botman has been bad, Schar has been exceptional. Gone unnoticed but he has been one of the best CBs in the league this season. 

Link to post
Share on other sites

He's a class performer, and yesterday was no exception, but he got done badly by Kane for their goal. He was a bit isolated mind, but still thought he shouldn't have got passed so easily.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I said botman was better but may be overcorrecting from seeing schar doing more sort of last ditchy stuff and so my mnd thinks botman probably sorting things out before gets there, but its just difficult they've both been brilliant. 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Just now, Tiresias said:

I said botman was better but may be overcorrecting from seeing schar doing more sort of last ditchy stuff and so my mnd thinks botman probably sorting things out before gets there, but its just difficult they've both been brilliant. 

Botman has made more mistakes and is far less exposed than Schar. Burn is usually close-by for Botman. Schar has also been a difference maker with the ball.

 

Schar seems to be the leader of the pair.

Link to post
Share on other sites

14 minutes ago, AyeDubbleYoo said:

He should’ve just taken Kane out nearer the half-way line, but I guess we were going to win so less desperation and need to take a yellow card. 

He tried to bring him down in the box once he'd got past him which would've gotten him sent off if he'd succeeded, never mind a yellow!

 

Don't take this the wrong way as I love him but he's not been his best defensively the past 3 games. He should have had more cover when he went to engage Kane for their goal but he still coould've done a lot better than he did 1 v 1. He's been dominating those encounters all season but Toney, Watkins and Kane have all done him in the last 3 games. 

Link to post
Share on other sites

9 hours ago, Ace said:


If you’ve watched him over the years, he went down after playing a bad pass so make of that what you will 

He said post game that he came off with a slight hamstring issue that would be assessed on Monday. Hopefully nothing.

Link to post
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, The College Dropout said:

Teams are targeting the space Trippier leaves in behind too.

Definitely but that's been the same all season and Schar's dealt with it fine. I think he needs to maintain a wider rest defence position than he has the past few games. Burn and Botman really have to move across as much as possible and be ready to cover when are building from the right. 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Trippier doesn't have the output he does without Schar. Schar is to the defence what Longstaff is to the midfield in that you'll definitely notice him when he's not there.

 

For me, he's brilliant and I personally don't agree with any of the paper talk about 'buying a replacement for Schar who's getting old', he's got years left in him, he's never been about pace and I think he can be a maintstay at the back for us for a few more years yet.

 

 

Edited by HawK

Link to post
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, The College Dropout said:

Aye that was poor.

 

Cost me a mega haul on FPL too.

 

But he's often in that position 1v1 with an attacker. And deals with it 9 times out of 10. Botman isn't often in that position as Burn is close by.

I also think that Botman is instructed to be the more aggressive of the two CB's as he has the recovery pace that Schar doesn't.

Link to post
Share on other sites

24 minutes ago, HawK said:

Trippier doesn't have the output he does without Schar. Schar is to the defence what Longstaff is to the midfield in that you'll definitely notice him when he's not there.

 

For me, he's brilliant and I personally don't agree with any of the paper talk about 'buying a replacement for Schar who's getting old', he's got years left in him, he's never been about pace and I think he can be a maintstay at the back for us for a few more years yet.

 

 

 

Eventually we'll need some pace at CB and we really need someone better than Lascelles. IMO we have to buy someone that can realistically take Schar's place. A CL level team needs 3 first choice CB's. 

Link to post
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Lenny said:

I also think that Botman is instructed to be the more aggressive of the two CB's as he has the recovery pace that Schar doesn't.

I'd consider Schar the more aggressive player. He's more likely to follow the attacker deep into their own half like he did on Son for Isak's first goal.

 

That was a good tactical bit by Howe. 

 

Also - I don't think Botman is significantly faster than Schar. Our entire backline is pretty slow.

Link to post
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, The College Dropout said:

Eventually we'll need some pace at CB and we really need someone better than Lascelles. IMO we have to buy someone that can realistically take Schar's place. A CL level team needs 3 first choice CB's. 

 

Agree on eventually - but I think the more immediate solution is a top-tier left back so Burn can move in the middle to provide cover there. I know being left-footed on the right isn't ideal, especially with Trippier up the pitch, so runners will go down the outside of him on his wrong foot, but I think this does more for the team in the short term.

Link to post
Share on other sites

32 minutes ago, The College Dropout said:

I'd consider Schar the more aggressive player. He's more likely to follow the attacker deep into their own half like he did on Son for Isak's first goal.

 

That was a good tactical bit by Howe. 

 

Also - I don't think Botman is significantly faster than Schar. Our entire backline is pretty slow.

I think Botman is more aggressive in that he'll hunt out attacking players when they are approaching our defensive third, whereas Schar is more likely to mop up should they get past the Botman/defensive charge.

 

Agreed on the pace of the backline, we could do with bringing in some faster players to offer more circumstantial depth.

 

I do think Botman is a fair bit faster than Schar, mind, even if he isn't "fast". Schar is seriously slow :lol:

 

 

Edited by Lenny

Link to post
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, Lenny said:

 

I do think Botman is a fair bit faster than Schar, mind, even if he isn't "fast". Schar is seriously slow :lol:

 

 

 

 

I remember before he signed there was some talk about Botman being slow, so I was surprised to see him show a decent turn of pace when getting run at in one game last season. I think he's quicker than he's given credit for.

Link to post
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, HawK said:

 

Agree on eventually - but I think the more immediate solution is a top-tier left back so Burn can move in the middle to provide cover there. I know being left-footed on the right isn't ideal, especially with Trippier up the pitch, so runners will go down the outside of him on his wrong foot, but I think this does more for the team in the short term.

We can’t go into a CL campaign with Burn our second choice LB and second choice CB. I don’t even think he’s second choice RCB - Lascelles has that spot.  
 

New LB

Burn

Botman

Schar

Lascelles

Trippier

Ashby

 

Is not good enough for the games we’ll have. 
 

An RCB isn’t as pressing as LB of course. But I’d be disappointed if we didn’t plug those gaps. 
 

We are similar to Arsenal. When they missed 2 or 3 (2 got injured in the same European game) the drop off is significant and has cost them crucial points. We’ve been so fortunate to not miss any for the entire season. 

Link to post
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Lenny said:

I think Botman is more aggressive in that he'll hunt out attacking players when they are approaching our defensive third, whereas Schar is more likely to mop up should they get past the Botman/defensive charge.

 

Agreed on the pace of the backline, we could do with bringing in some faster players to offer more circumstantial depth.

 

I do think Botman is a fair bit faster than Schar, mind, even if he isn't "fast". Schar is seriously slow :lol:

 

 

 

 

You should look at the average positions - Schar is the clear higher up CB and Botman is the one who's usually mopping up deeper. Schar's at his best when he's very aggresive winning the ball like that - recall his world class performance under Rafa at Leicester in 2019 (?) 

 

The CB's are both instructed to aggresively press and win back the ball when they come into the CF or wingers, ala Schar for Murph's howitzer and ala Botman for Willock's header v Man United. 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...