Jump to content

Mike Ashley (former owner)


Disco

?  

464 members have voted

  1. 1. ?

    • Takeover
      21
    • Fakeover
      11


Recommended Posts

Let him have a couple of SD advertising boards for life tbh, who cares, it's a drop in the ocean.

 

are you on smack? its an obscene request in the first place. though it does prove the point that its all he cares about

Link to post
Share on other sites

I think next window Ashley might fall ill and the whole club rally's around him so we can't sign players because of the circumstances (sell a few tho) and then he rises from his death bed like Lazarus on Feb 1st to declare "thats it I've changed my ways".

 

I just hope the cunt dies.

 

Evil doesn't die

 

Hitler, Pol Pot, Stalin, Tim Vine, Chairman Mao, Saddam Hussein says different.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I'm calling bull.

 

Monochrome was set up after the heads of terms was allegedly agreed was it not?

 

Mitch said all along that the Companies House thing had to be related because the project was called 'Project Monochrome'.

 

 

But why reveal ”Project Monochrome” after the company was created and not mention it before?

 

The ”Heads of Terms” cropped document he posted have I seen on Twitter before. Two weeks ago.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I'm calling bull.

 

Monochrome was set up after the heads of terms was allegedly agreed was it not?

 

Mitch said all along that the Companies House thing had to be related because the project was called 'Project Monochrome'.

 

 

But why reveal ”Project Monochrome” after the company was created and not mention it before?

 

The ”Heads of Terms” cropped document he posted have I seen on Twitter before. Two weeks ago.

 

He first posted it a few weeks ago. It’s not new from him.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Think I'll just be checking in every Monday until it's either sold - which I don't think the deal is actually dead (or fake) at this point tbh - or fucked. At this point I'm fine with being a few days late on the news either way. Time to haunt Chat.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I'm calling bull.

 

Monochrome was set up after the heads of terms was allegedly agreed was it not?

 

Mitch said all along that the Companies House thing had to be related because the project was called 'Project Monochrome'.

 

 

But why reveal ”Project Monochrome” after the company was created and not mention it before?

 

The ”Heads of Terms” cropped document he posted have I seen on Twitter before. Two weeks ago.

 

He first posted it a few weeks ago. It’s not new from him.

 

Really? Where?

Link to post
Share on other sites

I'm calling bull.

 

Monochrome was set up after the heads of terms was allegedly agreed was it not?

 

Mitch said all along that the Companies House thing had to be related because the project was called 'Project Monochrome'.

 

 

But why reveal ”Project Monochrome” after the company was created and not mention it before?

 

The ”Heads of Terms” cropped document he posted have I seen on Twitter before. Two weeks ago.

 

He first posted it a few weeks ago. It’s not new from him.

 

Really? Where?

 

On his twitter feed.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I'm calling bull.

 

Monochrome was set up after the heads of terms was allegedly agreed was it not?

 

Mitch said all along that the Companies House thing had to be related because the project was called 'Project Monochrome'.

 

 

But why reveal ”Project Monochrome” after the company was created and not mention it before?

 

The ”Heads of Terms” cropped document he posted have I seen on Twitter before. Two weeks ago.

 

He first posted it a few weeks ago. It’s not new from him.

 

Really? Where?

 

On his twitter feed.

 

No. I just spent 10 minutes looking through it  :lol:

Link to post
Share on other sites

I'm calling bull.

 

Monochrome was set up after the heads of terms was allegedly agreed was it not?

 

Mitch said all along that the Companies House thing had to be related because the project was called 'Project Monochrome'.

 

 

But why reveal ”Project Monochrome” after the company was created and not mention it before?

 

The ”Heads of Terms” cropped document he posted have I seen on Twitter before. Two weeks ago.

 

He first posted it a few weeks ago. It’s not new from him.

 

Really? Where?

 

On his twitter feed.

 

No. I just spent 10 minutes looking through it  :lol:

 

It’s litterally on the page you are posting on. Tweet from 5th June, you quoted it

Link to post
Share on other sites

I'm calling bull.

 

Monochrome was set up after the heads of terms was allegedly agreed was it not?

 

Mitch said all along that the Companies House thing had to be related because the project was called 'Project Monochrome'.

 

 

But why reveal ”Project Monochrome” after the company was created and not mention it before?

 

The ”Heads of Terms” cropped document he posted have I seen on Twitter before. Two weeks ago.

 

He first posted it a few weeks ago. It’s not new from him.

 

Really? Where?

 

On his twitter feed.

 

No. I just spent 10 minutes looking through it  :lol:

 

It’s litterally on the page you are posting on. Tweet from 5th June, you quoted it

 

Yes. Of course. That I know.

 

I thought LV was talking about the cropped ”Heads of Terms” image.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I'm calling bull.

 

Monochrome was set up after the heads of terms was allegedly agreed was it not?

 

Mitch said all along that the Companies House thing had to be related because the project was called 'Project Monochrome'.

 

 

But why reveal ”Project Monochrome” after the company was created and not mention it before?

 

The ”Heads of Terms” cropped document he posted have I seen on Twitter before. Two weeks ago.

 

He first posted it a few weeks ago. It’s not new from him.

 

Really? Where?

 

On his twitter feed.

 

No. I just spent 10 minutes looking through it  :lol:

 

It’s litterally on the page you are posting on. Tweet from 5th June, you quoted it

 

Yes. Of course. That I know.

 

I thought LV was talking about the cropped ”Heads of Terms” image.

 

Confusion :lol:

Link to post
Share on other sites

I'm calling bull.

 

Monochrome was set up after the heads of terms was allegedly agreed was it not?

 

Mitch said all along that the Companies House thing had to be related because the project was called 'Project Monochrome'.

 

 

But why reveal ”Project Monochrome” after the company was created and not mention it before?

 

The ”Heads of Terms” cropped document he posted have I seen on Twitter before. Two weeks ago.

 

He first posted it a few weeks ago. It’s not new from him.

 

Really? Where?

 

On his twitter feed.

 

No. I just spent 10 minutes looking through it  :lol:

 

It’s litterally on the page you are posting on. Tweet from 5th June, you quoted it

 

He posted that after the company was created. He's full of shit man.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Mike Ashley will never leave - even if we go down again he will LOAN us more money to deepen the debt - will some fukker please kill the leech I'll fund the statue

 

You kill him, we'll fund your lawyer.

 

Quid each lads?

Link to post
Share on other sites

I think there’s a good chance this will happen, just listen to Caulkin on the latest podcast.

 

Ashley’s testing the fans reaction to this, we’ve already been told they think we’d keep going in numbers.

 

He’ll go, but with the sports direct stuff in there. He’ll leave it until as late as possible to fuck us over.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...