TRon Posted June 30, 2020 Share Posted June 30, 2020 It does seem like we are grinding our way to a conclusion, but every time we say this, there's usually another few weeks of stonewalling. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Armchair Pundit Posted June 30, 2020 Share Posted June 30, 2020 Tuesday today, doesn't that mean we're due for another letter from someone with some 'damning' evidence or opinion? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
TheInfiniteOdyssey Posted June 30, 2020 Share Posted June 30, 2020 The SNP pontificating about how inappropriate it would be for Saudi to take over NUFC, when the Raytheon plant in Fife assembles the guided missiles for export to them Not to mention, they've been supported to the tune of well over £20m in Scottish public funds since the SNP came to power Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest chopey Posted June 30, 2020 Share Posted June 30, 2020 Tuesday today, doesn't that mean we're due for another letter from someone with some 'damning' evidence or opinion? I wrote to Qatar demanding a fist fight with their strongest 7 year old girl.................no response yet ...............fuckin typical Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Wolfcastle Posted June 30, 2020 Share Posted June 30, 2020 The SNP pontificating about how inappropriate it would be for Saudi to take over NUFC, when the Raytheon plant in Fife assembles the guided missiles for export to them Not to mention, they've been supported to the tune of well over £20m in Scottish public funds since the SNP came to power Pretty sure Nicholson sat on This Week and said he has no interest in football/sport. Okay there's something beyond sport here but why wasn't the same interest shown to other SA (and others) investments?. Also a few of his ex mates in the SNP fetch up on RT. Litvonenko, Skirpals, innocents caught up in that and the amount of innocents that could have been. Any outrage about that? Happened to happen in this very country. Is it the SNP - anti Israel/Saudi/USA pro Iran/Russia ideology in effect. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
RS Posted June 30, 2020 Share Posted June 30, 2020 Tuesday today, doesn't that mean we're due for another letter from someone with some 'damning' evidence or opinion? I wrote to Qatar demanding a fist fight with their strongest 7 year old girl.................no response yet ...............fuckin typical Back to noncing again I see. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest chopey Posted June 30, 2020 Share Posted June 30, 2020 Tuesday today, doesn't that mean we're due for another letter from someone with some 'damning' evidence or opinion? I wrote to Qatar demanding a fist fight with their strongest 7 year old girl.................no response yet ...............fuckin typical Back to noncing again I see. WTF Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dokko Posted June 30, 2020 Share Posted June 30, 2020 Tuesday today, doesn't that mean we're due for another letter from someone with some 'damning' evidence or opinion? I wrote to Qatar demanding a fist fight with their strongest 7 year old girl.................no response yet ...............fuckin typical Back to noncing again I see. WTF Does sound a bit noncy wanting to fist fight a 7 year old girl. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest chopey Posted June 30, 2020 Share Posted June 30, 2020 It was a shite joke don't put on me whats in your mind. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
thomas Posted June 30, 2020 Share Posted June 30, 2020 one more day without a decision, one step closer to the edge Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Greg Posted June 30, 2020 Share Posted June 30, 2020 Has the response been posted anywhere in here? If not will it be made public? It’ll be a standard ‘we can’t say anything, confidential process etc etc’ No - both letters are private for good reason. It's not a PR exercise to make twitter happy. The tweet explains it was an acknowledgement. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
LRD Posted June 30, 2020 Share Posted June 30, 2020 This is so going into thread #2 before it is concluded. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
New Beginnings Posted June 30, 2020 Share Posted June 30, 2020 Has the response been posted anywhere in here? If not will it be made public? It’ll be a standard ‘we can’t say anything, confidential process etc etc’ No - both letters are private for good reason. It's not a PR exercise to make twitter happy. The tweet explains it was an acknowledgement. Were you satisfied with the response Greg? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ikon Posted June 30, 2020 Share Posted June 30, 2020 So many new pages but nothing of note. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Toonjam88 Posted June 30, 2020 Share Posted June 30, 2020 Has the response been posted anywhere in here? If not will it be made public? It’ll be a standard ‘we can’t say anything, confidential process etc etc’ No - both letters are private for good reason. It's not a PR exercise to make twitter happy. The tweet explains it was an acknowledgement. So the basic thanks for your letter we take your concerns on board it’s a confidential process blah blah blah. The tweet just makes it look like they have something extra when they blatantly don’t. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
gdm Posted June 30, 2020 Share Posted June 30, 2020 Has the response been posted anywhere in here? If not will it be made public? It’ll be a standard ‘we can’t say anything, confidential process etc etc’ No - both letters are private for good reason. It's not a PR exercise to make twitter happy. The tweet explains it was an acknowledgement. So the basic thanks for your letter we take your concerns on board it’s a confidential process blah blah blah. The tweet just makes it look like they have something extra when they blatantly don’t. Basically what I just said and he said no to Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Joey Linton Posted June 30, 2020 Share Posted June 30, 2020 Has the response been posted anywhere in here? If not will it be made public? It’ll be a standard ‘we can’t say anything, confidential process etc etc’ No - both letters are private for good reason. It's not a PR exercise to make twitter happy. The tweet explains it was an acknowledgement. So the basic thanks for your letter we take your concerns on board it’s a confidential process blah blah blah. The tweet just makes it look like they have something extra when they blatantly don’t. This will be exactly what it is. If it's not to make twitter aware / happy, what exactly did they tweet for? Same old, same old. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Judge Holden Posted June 30, 2020 Share Posted June 30, 2020 Absolutely disgusting from NUST. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
LFEE Posted June 30, 2020 Share Posted June 30, 2020 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
mouldy_uk Posted June 30, 2020 Share Posted June 30, 2020 Russell Howard has been busy today Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Greg Posted June 30, 2020 Share Posted June 30, 2020 Absolutely disgusting that NUST is letting its members and other fans know it has a dialogue with the Premier League on behalf of its members. Absolutely disgusting decision to keep this dialogue open and look to build a better platform with the PL to stand up for fans. Disgusting that NUST wants to act professionally and build that dialogue further for the betterment of fans going forward in the long term rather than just as a PR exercise. Of course it would have been much better to just release the letter it sent as a PR exercise and make NUFC twitter happy, and not get a response from the CEO of the Premier League, and not build a relationship for future dialogue with the top man at the Premier League. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Pilko Posted June 30, 2020 Share Posted June 30, 2020 Absolutely disgusting from NUST. no it isn't Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Judge Holden Posted June 30, 2020 Share Posted June 30, 2020 Absolutely disgusting from NUST. no it isn't I know. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
LFEE Posted June 30, 2020 Share Posted June 30, 2020 Absolutely disgusting that NUST is letting its members and other fans know it has a dialogue with the Premier League on behalf of its members. Absolutely disgusting decision to keep this dialogue open and look to build a better platform with the PL to stand up for fans. Disgusting that NUST wants to act professionally and build that dialogue further for the betterment of fans going forward in the long term rather than just as a PR exercise. Of course it would have been much better to just release the letter it sent as a PR exercise and make NUFC twitter happy, and not get a response from the CEO of the Premier League, and not build a relationship for future dialogue with the top man at the Premier League. Exactly Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
madras Posted June 30, 2020 Share Posted June 30, 2020 Some section that section F. Could include almost every human on Earth when it states about including those who could possibly become directors in the future. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts