Scoot Posted August 28, 2020 Share Posted August 28, 2020 They didn't block anything, they tried their hardest to give PIF a way in - saying "no, but if you were to do this/that/the other we'll allow it" - despite there being the width of a cigarette paper between PIF and an organization that had been openly and blatantly pirating their product. I'm fucked off that it didn't go through and all, but all the conspiracy bollocks going is pathetic. Hi Richard! Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tiresias Posted August 28, 2020 Share Posted August 28, 2020 rage at him all you want, I think premier league has been slow and obtuse on this but largely agree with him. THe conspiracy against us is bollocks, we're just the first suckers to get hurt by a premier league bothering to actually block a takeover, which is typical of us. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest reefatoon Posted August 28, 2020 Share Posted August 28, 2020 rage at him all you want, I think premier league has been slow and obtuse on this but largely agree with him. THe conspiracy against us is bollocks, we're just the first suckers to get hurt by a premier league bothering to actually block a takeover, which is typical of us. They didn’t block it though, they put their heads in the sand and ignored it until it went away. Was f***ing pathetic handling and in no way them trying to pass it. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
marki Posted August 28, 2020 Share Posted August 28, 2020 The way the takeover panned out and ultimately failed was because there was 1 way the epl could get the outcome they wanted and they used it..no coincidence at all , simply contrived and planned Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Whitley mag Posted August 28, 2020 Share Posted August 28, 2020 rage at him all you want, I think premier league has been slow and obtuse on this but largely agree with him. THe conspiracy against us is bollocks, we're just the first suckers to get hurt by a premier league bothering to actually block a takeover, which is typical of us. They didn’t block it though, they put their heads in the sand and ignored it until it went away. Was f***ing pathetic handling and in no way them trying to pass it. Exactly if they rejected it and provided a reason there would be no conspiracy theories. The allegation that they didn’t reject it because they weren’t confident of making that decision will always remain. Anyone who believes the offer of arbitration was them offering an olive branch to prevent rejection, needs to give their fucking head a shake. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tiresias Posted August 28, 2020 Share Posted August 28, 2020 I agree they should have outright block it, but they seem to have said, we cant pass you until MBS is named as a director then we will do the test on him, and then the consortium couldnt do that. I do think they dragged it out way too long, I agree, noone comes out of this looking good, but its not a conspiracy, the premier league just is that obtuse, and of course we're the ones stiffed by it all. And of course this is cos we are the first tested under expanded fit and proper person rules, the doors are shut to new big takeovers now they've got enough of them i guess. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Whitley mag Posted August 28, 2020 Share Posted August 28, 2020 I agree they should have outright block it, but they seem to have said, we cant pass you until MBS is named as a director then we will do the test on him, and then the consortium couldnt do that. I do think they dragged it out way too long, I agree, noone comes out of this looking good, but its not a conspiracy, the premier league just is that obtuse, and of course we're the ones stiffed by it all. And of course this is cos we are the first tested under expanded fit and proper person rules, the doors are shut to new big takeovers now they've got enough of them i guess. Your first sentence is the whole point though, if the consortium do not believe MBS should be subjected to test then the PL should just reject it. Instead they refused to make a decision and left them with no option but to pull out. The PL then on the day the deal expired allegedly made a belated offer of arbitration. This is before we even get into the realms of leaks and outside influences. Members of the NUST on a podcast basically accused Bill Bush of briefing certain members of the media. There are people on here who believe conspiracy theories make us look stupid and paranoid, that’s their opinion and to be honest I can no longer be arsed to argue the toss. However, I will never believe the s*** Masters and co have come out with in relation to this takeover, and I 100% agree with Staveley where she accuses them of being disingenuous. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Shearergol Posted August 28, 2020 Share Posted August 28, 2020 I agree they should have outright block it, but they seem to have said, we cant pass you until MBS is named as a director then we will do the test on him, and then the consortium couldnt do that. I do think they dragged it out way too long, I agree, noone comes out of this looking good, but its not a conspiracy, the premier league just is that obtuse, and of course we're the ones stiffed by it all. And of course this is cos we are the first tested under expanded fit and proper person rules, the doors are shut to new big takeovers now they've got enough of them i guess. Your first sentence is the whole point though, if the consortium do not believe MBS should be subjected to test then the PL should just reject it. Instead they refused to make a decision and left them with no option but to pull out. The PL then on the day the deal expired allegedly made a belated offer of arbitration. This is before we even get into the realms of leaks and outside influences. Members of the NUST on a podcast basically accused Bill Bush of briefing certain members of the media. There are people on here who believe conspiracy theories make us look stupid and paranoid, and that’s their opinion and to be honest I can no longer be arsed to argue the toss. However, I will never believe the shit Masters and co have come out with in relation to this takeover, and I 100% agree with Staveley where she accuses them of being disingenuous. Even knowing all that, you still think there is a chance? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Whitley mag Posted August 28, 2020 Share Posted August 28, 2020 I agree they should have outright block it, but they seem to have said, we cant pass you until MBS is named as a director then we will do the test on him, and then the consortium couldnt do that. I do think they dragged it out way too long, I agree, noone comes out of this looking good, but its not a conspiracy, the premier league just is that obtuse, and of course we're the ones stiffed by it all. And of course this is cos we are the first tested under expanded fit and proper person rules, the doors are shut to new big takeovers now they've got enough of them i guess. Your first sentence is the whole point though, if the consortium do not believe MBS should be subjected to test then the PL should just reject it. Instead they refused to make a decision and left them with no option but to pull out. The PL then on the day the deal expired allegedly made a belated offer of arbitration. This is before we even get into the realms of leaks and outside influences. Members of the NUST on a podcast basically accused Bill Bush of briefing certain members of the media. There are people on here who believe conspiracy theories make us look stupid and paranoid, and that’s their opinion and to be honest I can no longer be arsed to argue the toss. However, I will never believe the s*** Masters and co have come out with in relation to this takeover, and I 100% agree with Staveley where she accuses them of being disingenuous. Even knowing all that, you still think there is a chance? Funnily enough I do but I’m not going to bang that drum anymore either, time will tell and I’m more than happy to let it just play out. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tiresias Posted August 28, 2020 Share Posted August 28, 2020 I agree they should have outright block it, but they seem to have said, we cant pass you until MBS is named as a director then we will do the test on him, and then the consortium couldnt do that. I do think they dragged it out way too long, I agree, noone comes out of this looking good, but its not a conspiracy, the premier league just is that obtuse, and of course we're the ones stiffed by it all. And of course this is cos we are the first tested under expanded fit and proper person rules, the doors are shut to new big takeovers now they've got enough of them i guess. Your first sentence is the whole point though, if the consortium do not believe MBS should be subjected to test then the PL should just reject it. Instead they refused to make a decision and left them with no option but to pull out. The PL then on the day the deal expired allegedly made a belated offer of arbitration. This is before we even get into the realms of leaks and outside influences. Members of the NUST on a podcast basically accused Bill Bush of briefing certain members of the media. There are people on here who believe conspiracy theories make us look stupid and paranoid, that’s their opinion and to be honest I can no longer be arsed to argue the toss. However, I will never believe the s*** Masters and co have come out with in relation to this takeover, and I 100% agree with Staveley where she accuses them of being disingenuous. I do agree with most of this. Premier league should have flat out said not in current form come back later if you want to fix it rather than th eneless wait. I do think Staverley was well intentioned and mostly honest, a little bit of me though wonders if they did play dumb about it to get fans riled up in hope that pressure would change master's mind. Still, it all leaves a sour taste in my mouth. However I do want to go back to my point, that the consipracy everything against us narrative just helps ashley curry undeserved sympathy. Until someone buys us, and frankly we would have probably been bought by now if he wasn't such a famous cunt to deal with, our misery is on him. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Thumbheed Posted August 28, 2020 Share Posted August 28, 2020 Why wouldn't someone like AS just come out and say it was off if it was off? She's been pretty open with it in the past. Won't read much into Ahsley saying fuck all cos I think the confusion distracts from the utter shitshow at the club at the mo but Stavely, can't think of a single logical reason for why she's kept quiet. Also think its telling that there was pretty much blanket coverage of "things going silent" which has proved to be the case, that feels like a deliberate message from the parties as if to say we will no longer be playing this out in public and rightly so. I think this is still ongoing but I'm not confident at all of it going through at all. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Whitley mag Posted August 28, 2020 Share Posted August 28, 2020 I agree they should have outright block it, but they seem to have said, we cant pass you until MBS is named as a director then we will do the test on him, and then the consortium couldnt do that. I do think they dragged it out way too long, I agree, noone comes out of this looking good, but its not a conspiracy, the premier league just is that obtuse, and of course we're the ones stiffed by it all. And of course this is cos we are the first tested under expanded fit and proper person rules, the doors are shut to new big takeovers now they've got enough of them i guess. Your first sentence is the whole point though, if the consortium do not believe MBS should be subjected to test then the PL should just reject it. Instead they refused to make a decision and left them with no option but to pull out. The PL then on the day the deal expired allegedly made a belated offer of arbitration. This is before we even get into the realms of leaks and outside influences. Members of the NUST on a podcast basically accused Bill Bush of briefing certain members of the media. There are people on here who believe conspiracy theories make us look stupid and paranoid, that’s their opinion and to be honest I can no longer be arsed to argue the toss. However, I will never believe the s*** Masters and co have come out with in relation to this takeover, and I 100% agree with Staveley where she accuses them of being disingenuous. I do agree with most of this. Premier league should have flat out said not in current form come back later if you want to fix it rather than th eneless wait. I do think Staverley was well intentioned and mostly honest, a little bit of me though wonders if they did play dumb about it to get fans riled up in hope that pressure would change master's mind. Still, it all leaves a sour taste in my mouth. However I do want to go back to my point, that the consipracy everything against us narrative just helps ashley curry undeserved sympathy. Until someone buys us, and frankly we would have probably been bought by now if he wasn't such a famous c*** to deal with, our misery is on him. In no way by blaming the PL should it be seen as condoning how Ashley is running the club. Almost lost in all this is the fact he wanted to renegotiate the deal once it had expired, even though Staveley didn’t blame him, he must have known how precarious the deal was at this point. The fact he was even willing to jeopardise the deal tells us all we need to know, and my current anger at the PL in no way diminishes my hatred for the man. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tsunami Posted August 28, 2020 Share Posted August 28, 2020 Would like to know how leaked it to the WSJ, as it turns out it was doomed from that point. Nowt but negative coverage from there. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Paully Posted August 29, 2020 Share Posted August 29, 2020 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
mouldy_uk Posted August 29, 2020 Share Posted August 29, 2020 Why wouldn't someone like AS just come out and say it was off if it was off? She's been pretty open with it in the past. Won't read much into Ahsley saying fuck all cos I think the confusion distracts from the utter shitshow at the club at the mo but Stavely, can't think of a single logical reason for why she's kept quiet. Also think its telling that there was pretty much blanket coverage of "things going silent" which has proved to be the case, that feels like a deliberate message from the parties as if to say we will no longer be playing this out in public and rightly so. I think this is still ongoing but I'm not confident at all of it going through at all. Also if it is 100% over, would there not have been recent activity on the companies house website, which as far as I can tell hasn’t happened (correct me if I’m wrong)? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
gdm Posted August 29, 2020 Share Posted August 29, 2020 Why wouldn't someone like AS just come out and say it was off if it was off? She's been pretty open with it in the past. Won't read much into Ahsley saying fuck all cos I think the confusion distracts from the utter shitshow at the club at the mo but Stavely, can't think of a single logical reason for why she's kept quiet. Also think its telling that there was pretty much blanket coverage of "things going silent" which has proved to be the case, that feels like a deliberate message from the parties as if to say we will no longer be playing this out in public and rightly so. I think this is still ongoing but I'm not confident at all of it going through at all. Also if it is 100% over, would there not have been recent activity on the companies house website, which as far as I can tell hasn’t happened (correct me if I’m wrong)? Dunno about that. Monochrome limited is still there Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
relámpago blanco Posted August 29, 2020 Share Posted August 29, 2020 Is this still on? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ankles Bennett Posted August 29, 2020 Share Posted August 29, 2020 I cant see the Reuben bros buying us. I think they were only onboard so they would get all the Saudi area regeneration funding. They have the land in newcastle all they needed was someone like the Saudi's to fund the various regeneration projects. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Robster Posted August 29, 2020 Share Posted August 29, 2020 Is this still on? No. There is no suggestion from any angle or source that it's still a thing so for me, the deal is completely finished. Everyone involved has moved on. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
relámpago blanco Posted August 29, 2020 Share Posted August 29, 2020 Is this still on? No. There is no suggestion from any angle or source that it's still a thing so for me, the deal is completely finished. Everyone involved has moved on. Shame I thought it would have been done by now. Very strange. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
St1pe Posted August 29, 2020 Share Posted August 29, 2020 Is this still on? No. There is no suggestion from any angle or source that it's still a thing so for me, the deal is completely finished. Everyone involved has moved on. Shame I thought it would have been done by now. Very strange. Reading between the lines there seems to be some sort of talks behind the scenes that they want to keep quiet. Caulkin mentioned something about if a bid could be revisited or words to that effect. My gut feeling is there might be something going on but nothing pressing or imminent. At best if there’s a desire to make it happen there could be something in the future. I think realistically it’s dead though and I’m still gutted about that. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rompe Posted August 29, 2020 Share Posted August 29, 2020 https://www.skysports.com/football/news/11678/12051917/newcastle-takeover-premier-league-chief-richard-masters-to-face-fan-questions Interesting that according to Masters, the dispute was about who would effectively be controlling NUFC. I think you have to be very naïve to believe the consortiums claim that they would have zero influence over the running of the club. "Masters says the Premier League asked for "additional information, which would have been used to consider" any potential disqualification, but the consortium disagreed with their assessment and withdrew their bid." So is this what it's about? The consortium didn't agree that Saudi Arabia would effectively own NUFC, and thus didn't give the PL the information they asked for. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tiresias Posted August 29, 2020 Share Posted August 29, 2020 As i understand it is is much more specific about Mohammed Bin Salman who is director of the investment fund coughing up the money. The consortium had some nominated directors who they said had authority and were running the money for NUFC but the league essentially did not believe that MBS wouldnt have authority over them and thus asked that he go through a fit and proper person test (which I dont know if plausible he would pass). The consortium gave over as I understand it a lot of written guarantees that MBS would not have any say in teh running of it but essentially the league did not believe it, and that was the end of that. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Darth Crooks Posted August 29, 2020 Share Posted August 29, 2020 At the risk of sounding Trumpian. Both sides don’t add up with the info we have. Not necessarily equally mind. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Scoot Posted August 29, 2020 Share Posted August 29, 2020 At the end of the day, whatever the reasons for it collapsing all I will say is, if this same consortium had bid for ANY of the top 6 clubs there is absolutely no way it wouldn't have been approved. It may have taken slightly longer than the 2 to 4 weeks that was mentioned but there is literally no way the premier league would have acted in the same way as they did with us. I'm 100% convinced this. It's a closed shop at the top of the league, everyone else is just expected to be happy to make up the numbers every season. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts