Jump to content

Takeover Thread - July 1st statement, Staveley letter to Tracey Crouch (and response) in OP


Recommended Posts

Guest reefatoon

Bein Jacobs.

[emoji38]

 

Find it hard to believe that Ashley and a member club would put out a statement asserting the bid was formally rejected if it just simply wasn't the case

 

Exactly, Jacobs is making no sense there.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Guest neesy111

Bein Jacobs.

[emoji38]

 

Find it hard to believe that Ashley and a member club would put out a statement asserting the bid was formally rejected if it just simply wasn't the case

 

Yeah, it's been rejected.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Bein Jacobs.

[emoji38]

Find it hard to believe that Ashley and a member club would put out a statement asserting the bid was formally rejected if it just simply wasn't the case

Are you saying you can't believe that Mike Ashley would try to mislead people ? :lol:

Link to post
Share on other sites

Bein Jacobs.

[emoji38]

Find it hard to believe that Ashley and a member club would put out a statement asserting the bid was formally rejected if it just simply wasn't the case

Are you saying you can't believe that Mike Ashley would try to mislead people ? [emoji38]

No, I'm saying it would be fucking stupid to say the PL had formally rejected the deal if they actually hadn't :)

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Bein Jacobs.

[emoji38]

Find it hard to believe that Ashley and a member club would put out a statement asserting the bid was formally rejected if it just simply wasn't the case

Are you saying you can't believe that Mike Ashley would try to mislead people ? [emoji38]

No, I'm saying it would be fucking stupid to say the PL had formally rejected the deal if they actually hadn't :)

:laugh:

That's fair.

Link to post
Share on other sites

 

Seems pretty obvious like.  PIF announced their withdrawal, but it's the club who informs the league of a takeover and the club who officially withdraws.  The club didnt withdraw and kept at it. The Premier League mentioned PIF withdrawing in statements as a easy answer to public questions as they continued to argue with the club on the quiet.  Now they've finally had to make a decision.

 

Jacobs is either being deliberately obtuse or he's thick.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Best thing about this announcement for me is the fact that the pricks who were buzzing off constantly telling everyone that the deal was dead and buried were wrong.

 

My view was that they probably were talking in the background but they wouldn’t find a way to get it passed as the PL wouldn’t budge on their stance and that’s proven to be the case, It’s now been officially rejected. I don’t get the crowing of the ‘it’s still on’ crowd.

 

Bar a lengthy court case or appeal process at this moment the deal has been rejected. Dead

Link to post
Share on other sites

Frankly I think the whole thing is theatre from all parties:

  • PL don't want to be seen as being complicit in "sportswashing" so they couldn't approve.
  • An immediate rejection ran the risk of being resolved before the season started and we would have become too strong.
  • A deal was struck between PL, PIF, Stavely, RB, NUFC et al that the PL would dawde until it was too late and then reject
  • However, the deal also outlined that the PL would now hand over (guaranteed) approval to the appeals committee, an even more opaque and impenetrable group/process, thus saving face
  • The Big Six shadow cabal has approved this plan of action and the 2020/2021 season script setting up for NUFC ascension is wild.

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
×
×
  • Create New...