Jump to content

Takeover Thread - July 1st statement, Staveley letter to Tracey Crouch (and response) in OP


Recommended Posts

I’d love to know if this fan consortium legal action has the backing of or is part of action being taken by Ashley and his legal team. Otherwise it’s just noise really isn’t it?

 

Demarco, Jamie rueben and staveley’s husband have all liked or shared It so it’s got their public backing at least

 

Are they involved behind the scenes? Fuck knows

Link to post
Share on other sites

I’d love to know if this fan consortium legal action has the backing of or is part of action being taken by Ashley and his legal team. Otherwise it’s just noise really isn’t it?

 

Exactly - hopefully its part of a concerted coordinated effort to turn the screw.

 

Bloke behind it seems to be an accountant and active in the energy/oil industry.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I’d love to know if this fan consortium legal action has the backing of or is part of action being taken by Ashley and his legal team. Otherwise it’s just noise really isn’t it?

 

Demarco, Jamie rueben and staveley’s husband have all liked or shared It so it’s got their public backing at least

 

Are they involved behind the scenes? Fuck knows

 

Looks like all of this is part of a coordinated strategy, interesting times.

Link to post
Share on other sites

That letter demands a response by the PL by 4pm on November the 3rd.

 

It also requests all documents from the PL, emails texts and even what's apps  :lol:

 

Imagine the corruption in those.

 

If documents like those are ever requested by a court of law you can bet your bottom dollar they will conveniently not exist or have been ‘lost’ :lol:

Link to post
Share on other sites

I’d love to know if this fan consortium legal action has the backing of or is part of action being taken by Ashley and his legal team. Otherwise it’s just noise really isn’t it?

 

Demarco, Jamie rueben and staveley’s husband have all liked or shared It so it’s got their public backing at least

 

Are they involved behind the scenes? Fuck knows

 

Looks like all of this is part of a coordinated strategy, interesting times.

 

Does it really though? All we’ve got is a few twitter likes from the right people. Think we need to see more substance than that to believe it’s a concerted joint effort. I really hope it is but not convinced yet.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Fan-led action, so essentially it means absolutely f*** all then  :lol:

 

Liam Kennedy has been a joke throughout this takeover, shamelessly stringing along fans for months

 

He’ll be back on Steve Wraith’s show again now

 

You literally couldn’t be more wrong about every statement you’ve just made.

 

That wasn’t the first time DeMarco saw that letter, let’s say he may have had an input in a lot of it. Ignore the fan led action bit as it really isn’t.

 

Kennedy probably knows the most out of any journo regarding this (that includes Caulkin)

Link to post
Share on other sites

Guest reefatoon

That letter demands a response by the PL by 4pm on November the 3rd.

 

It also requests all documents from the PL, emails texts and even what's apps  :lol:

 

Imagine the corruption in those.

 

If documents like those are ever requested by a court of law you can bet your bottom dollar they will conveniently not exist or have been ‘lost’ :lol:

 

They would pass it through well before they had to hand any of that over.  Quick, pass it so it goes away.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Fan-led action, so essentially it means absolutely f*** all then  :lol:

 

Liam Kennedy has been a joke throughout this takeover, shamelessly stringing along fans for months

 

He’ll be back on Steve Wraith’s show again now

 

You literally couldn’t be more wrong about every statement you’ve just made.

 

That wasn’t the first time DeMarco saw that letter, let’s say he may have had an input in a lot of it. Ignore the fan led action bit as it really isn’t.

 

Kennedy probably knows the most out of any journo regarding this (that includes Caulkin)

 

Ok so this is more interesting. Thanks Mimms[/member], hope you’re right.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Fan-led action, so essentially it means absolutely f*** all then  :lol:

 

Liam Kennedy has been a joke throughout this takeover, shamelessly stringing along fans for months

 

He’ll be back on Steve Wraith’s show again now

 

You literally couldn’t be more wrong about every statement you’ve just made.

 

That wasn’t the first time DeMarco saw that letter, let’s say he may have had an input in a lot of it. Ignore the fan led action bit as it really isn’t.

 

Kennedy probably knows the most out of any journo regarding this (that includes Caulkin)

 

Best poster by a mile :lol:

 

Answer me one thing tho mimms. Who is moneymikeashley? :lol:

Link to post
Share on other sites

Fan-led action, so essentially it means absolutely f*** all then  :lol:

 

Liam Kennedy has been a joke throughout this takeover, shamelessly stringing along fans for months

 

He’ll be back on Steve Wraith’s show again now

 

You literally couldn’t be more wrong about every statement you’ve just made.

 

That wasn’t the first time DeMarco saw that letter, let’s say he may have had an input in a lot of it. Ignore the fan led action bit as it really isn’t.

 

Kennedy probably knows the most out of any journo regarding this (that includes Caulkin)

 

So it’s part of a coordinated strategy? :smitten:

Link to post
Share on other sites

It's a nice P.R. piece, if nothing else. Substantively, though, I have doubts that a supporters group would be found to have standing to pursue an anti-trust case here (i.e., how has the Consortium Supporters group been harmed?). And somebody else being behind it wouldn't solve that problem if they're not going to step up and be a party. Not hating on it, though--somebody has put some effort and money into it, so hopefully it helps.

Link to post
Share on other sites

It looks coordinated to me.

 

Nick DeMarco retweeted it.  Mehrdad Ghodoussi retweeted it.  Jamie Reuben retweeted it.

 

The actual letter (not the fans waffle), sounds like the procedural starting point for a legal challenge.  I'd hazard a guess there's some strategic significance to it in coming from a third-party.  Just me guessing again (no lawyer), but there may be more weight/validity to their case since they're fronting (never heard of them) as an affected party (e.g. the fans).  And perhaps being involved in that course of action prevents those challengers from other legal actions, freeing up DeMarco to hoof them in the balls from another direction.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Any good lawyer would have done their checks regarding other upcoming legal action being prepared that they can join with and or piggy back so I would imagine the fan movement has the blessing of those involved

Link to post
Share on other sites

It's a nice P.R. piece, if nothing else. Substantively, though, I have doubts that a supporters group would be found to have standing to pursue an anti-trust case here (i.e., how has the Consortium Supporters group been harmed?). And somebody else being behind it wouldn't solve that problem if they're not going to step up and be a party. Not hating on it, though--somebody has put some effort and money into it, so hopefully it helps.

 

Customers are able to engage in legal action if it affects their costs or the quality of the product.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Promising stuff but the presence of this weird Consortium Fan Group thing has got me absolutely baffled. Has it been constructed by the legal teams themselves, for some reason? Why would they do that?

Link to post
Share on other sites

It's a nice P.R. piece, if nothing else. Substantively, though, I have doubts that a supporters group would be found to have standing to pursue an anti-trust case here (i.e., how has the Consortium Supporters group been harmed?). And somebody else being behind it wouldn't solve that problem if they're not going to step up and be a party. Not hating on it, though--somebody has put some effort and money into it, so hopefully it helps.

 

Customers are able to engage in legal action if it affects their costs or the quality of the product.

 

The letter isn't persuasive in that regard, then, as it doesn't establish either of those.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
×
×
  • Create New...