TRon Posted November 29, 2020 Share Posted November 29, 2020 Mimms is quiet Caulkin doesn't think much will happen this/next month I dont think silence is a good thing, I just don't think anything is happening to move us forward There's clearly stuff happening behind the scenes, but was is also pretty apparent is that the PL aren't going to buckle easily. Not sure what sort of backing they have got from their friends in the Big Six, but they seem pretty adamant so far. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sean Posted November 29, 2020 Share Posted November 29, 2020 Time seems to be running out for this to be sorted before the January window I think Mimms is the only one who thinks theres a chance of it being sorted before then. Based on what he’s said, the people involved, the pressure on the PL etc I think a takeover is a possibility in December or in January. We seen miles away at the moment Based on what? The thing is we don’t know. But with buyers + Ashley + lawyers involved there’s a possibility something could be around the corner. Based on caulkin who talks to the buying side mainly. Fair enough. I think George Caulkin is cautious in what he says this time though. If 'no red flags' George is being cautious it's probably because of his experience of being given information from the buying side that hasn't materialised. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
alexf Posted November 29, 2020 Share Posted November 29, 2020 Don't engage New Beginnings. He's the same person in the chat section who repeatedly told everyone Trump still won the election and we would see when all the legal cases came out . Repeats himself till he gets bites. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
New Beginnings Posted November 29, 2020 Share Posted November 29, 2020 Don't engage New Beginnings. He's the same person in the chat section who repeatedly told everyone Trump still won the election and we would see when all the legal cases came out . Repeats himself till he gets bites. Not after bites mate. Said nothing that can be construed as factually incorrect! Anyway, if you want to discuss your nonsense im happy to do it over DM. Im sure these fine folk don't want to hear it Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
UncleBingo Posted November 29, 2020 Share Posted November 29, 2020 Don't engage New Beginnings. He's the same person in the chat section who repeatedly told everyone Trump still won the election and we would see when all the legal cases came out . Repeats himself till he gets bites. Not after bites mate. Said nothing that can be construed as factually incorrect! Anyway, if you want to discuss your nonsense im happy to do it over DM. Im sure these fine folk don't want to hear it Have you accepted that Trump lost the election yet? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
New Beginnings Posted November 29, 2020 Share Posted November 29, 2020 Desperately hoping for an update this week Mimms 🙏 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
gdm Posted November 29, 2020 Share Posted November 29, 2020 Desperately hoping for an update this week Mimms 🙏 Would be nice. For no real reason I’m feeling a bit deflated Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Strawberry Posted November 29, 2020 Share Posted November 29, 2020 After what we said to Mimms on Friday wonder why he bother to give info for most ungrateful members here. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Robster Posted November 29, 2020 Share Posted November 29, 2020 Yep. Wouldn't be surprised if Mimms draws a line under posting, especially knowing that IMTTS is sniffing around, stirring things. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ketsbaia Posted November 29, 2020 Share Posted November 29, 2020 Also, the rate at which Mimms is expected to update is crazy. It can't be a daily thing Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
gdm Posted November 29, 2020 Share Posted November 29, 2020 Don’t remember anything negative said to mimms really. Quite the opposite a few people put bets on the back of his info. Only poor thing was someone giving info to imtts Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Wilson Posted November 29, 2020 Share Posted November 29, 2020 Yep. Wouldn't be surprised if Mimms draws a line under posting, especially knowing that IMTTS is sniffing around, stirring things. Not sure why he's been allowed to just come back and crack on with his usual shite tbh Constant pointless bollocks. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Strawberry Posted November 29, 2020 Share Posted November 29, 2020 Don’t remember anything negative said to mimms really. Quite the opposite a few people put bets on the back of his info. Only poor thing was someone giving info to imtts If we wants info from him we need to ban IMTTS. He will come back with new user name he should be banned whenever members found him out. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bimpy474 Posted November 29, 2020 Share Posted November 29, 2020 Don’t remember anything negative said to mimms really. Quite the opposite a few people put bets on the back of his info. Only poor thing was someone giving info to imtts If we wants info from him we need to ban IMTTS. He will come back with new user name he should be banned whenever members found him out. As annoying as Penn/IMTTS is, you can't just ban him for being contrary to whatever the consensus is, that's ridiculous. If he got around a ban using a new log in, than aye kick him out. If he's constantly being a dick against the rules, then aye kick him out. In regard to Mimms, Mimms should just carry on, if what he hears is legit then he can rightly say 'i told you so'. But you can't ban someone for not believing him, that's just daft. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sean Posted November 29, 2020 Share Posted November 29, 2020 Are we allowed to ask Mimms what he meant by "it may be a few weeks until the champagne gets opened" which he posted 5 weeks ago? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rod Posted November 29, 2020 Share Posted November 29, 2020 Time seems to be running out for this to be sorted before the January window I think Mimms is the only one who thinks theres a chance of it being sorted before then. Based on what he’s said, the people involved, the pressure on the PL etc I think a takeover is a possibility in December or in January. We seen miles away at the moment Based on what? The thing is we don’t know. But with buyers + Ashley + lawyers involved there’s a possibility something could be around the corner. Based on caulkin who talks to the buying side mainly. Fair enough. I think George Caulkin is cautious in what he says this time though. If 'no red flags' George is being cautious it's probably because of his experience of being given information from the buying side that hasn't materialised. We were "shafted" by the corrupt EPL. That's hardly the fault of Caulkin. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Twenties Unlaced Posted November 29, 2020 Share Posted November 29, 2020 Don’t remember anything negative said to mimms really. Quite the opposite a few people put bets on the back of his info. Only poor thing was someone giving info to imtts If we wants info from him we need to ban IMTTS. He will come back with new user name he should be banned whenever members found him out. As annoying as Penn/IMTTS is, you can't just ban him for being contrary to whatever the consensus is, that's ridiculous. If he got around a ban using a new log in, than aye kick him out. If he's constantly being a dick against the rules, then aye kick him out. In regard to Mimms, Mimms should just carry on, if what he hears is legit then he can rightly say 'i told you so'. But you can't ban someone for not believing him, that's just daft. Exactly, Penn/IMTTS/Sean get called all sorts of things for going against the grain, one of them even gets a ban for it. But the people calling them cunts don’t. This place is a year 8 playground. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Robster Posted November 29, 2020 Share Posted November 29, 2020 Exactly, Penn/IMTTS/Sean get called all sorts of things for going against the grain, one of them even gets a ban for it. But the people calling them cunts don’t. This place is a year 8 playground. IMTTS doesn't "go against the grain". They never engage in a conversation with anyone and only posts when they want to put down, belittle and be condescending. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
gdm Posted November 29, 2020 Share Posted November 29, 2020 The only thread he posts in is the takeover thread and his posts are to wind people up. He offers nothing to the forum as a whole Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Twenties Unlaced Posted November 29, 2020 Share Posted November 29, 2020 Sure, he’s annoying. Just don’t get why he needs to be banned for it. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
gdm Posted November 29, 2020 Share Posted November 29, 2020 Sure, he’s annoying. Just don’t get why he needs to be banned for it. Tbh I agree I wouldn’t ban him. Think people should just ignore his posts. Don’t give him what he’s looking for Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Robster Posted November 29, 2020 Share Posted November 29, 2020 Sure, he’s annoying. Just don’t get why he needs to be banned for it. Oh I agree that they shouldn't be banned. A non NUFC supporting WUM though, imo. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bimpy474 Posted November 29, 2020 Share Posted November 29, 2020 Don’t remember anything negative said to mimms really. Quite the opposite a few people put bets on the back of his info. Only poor thing was someone giving info to imtts If we wants info from him we need to ban IMTTS. He will come back with new user name he should be banned whenever members found him out. As annoying as Penn/IMTTS is, you can't just ban him for being contrary to whatever the consensus is, that's ridiculous. If he got around a ban using a new log in, than aye kick him out. If he's constantly being a dick against the rules, then aye kick him out. In regard to Mimms, Mimms should just carry on, if what he hears is legit then he can rightly say 'i told you so'. But you can't ban someone for not believing him, that's just daft. Exactly, Penn/IMTTS/Sean get called all sorts of things for going against the grain, one of them even gets a ban for it. But the people calling them cunts don’t. This place is a year 8 playground. Name calling doesn't bother me in the slightest, but i can understand why it would upset others, I'm far too old to care any more about daft stuff like that. I read Penn/IMTTS posts and just chuckle at their obvious baiting and ignore them, a reply is exactly what he wants. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Nobody Posted November 29, 2020 Share Posted November 29, 2020 Sure, he’s annoying. Just don’t get why he needs to be banned for it. If he was to get banned (again) it would be because he's a WUM, and we don't want posters on here only to wind people up. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest reefatoon Posted November 29, 2020 Share Posted November 29, 2020 Twenties unlaced sounds like another sickening Penn persona. Comes out of nowhere to stick up for himself, I mean imtts. Burn the cunt at the stake. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts