Jump to content

Takeover Thread - July 1st statement, Staveley letter to Tracey Crouch (and response) in OP


Recommended Posts

2 minutes ago, manorpark said:

100% false.

Why waste your life writing gibberish like that?

You are actually the worst poster on these takeover threads. At least those who are negative/cynical give reasoning behind their opinions. You just drop in every few days to make the same bullshit statement, knowing fine well it will just irritate everyone, and then bugger off again for a few days. You are a troll.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Guest neesy111
4 minutes ago, manorpark said:

I love a well thought out and articulate response . . . 

The irony.

Link to post
Share on other sites

12 minutes ago, Wandy said:

You are actually the worst poster on these takeover threads. At least those who are negative/cynical give reasoning behind their opinions. You just drop in every few days to make the same bullshit statement, knowing fine well it will just irritate everyone, and then bugger off again for a few days. You are a troll.

I remember saying a few months ago that he is the worst poster in the history of all iterations of Newcastle-Online. We’ve had some whoppers, in our time, but this one :rolleyes:

Link to post
Share on other sites

55 minutes ago, manorpark said:

Well said Keith.

It is interesting how all these obsessive "negative types" (the let's deny facts and logic types) always claim words like 'balanced' or 'realistic' for their negative exagerations.

As I have said many times, when logic points to a positive outcome, then positive = logical and balanced.

That is why the 'positive' thread should be renamed as the 'realistic' thread.

Keep it up Keith, you are fighting for us all (though some don't realise it) and you are fighting for the future of our NUFC.

 

Away with the fairies this lad like. :lol:

Link to post
Share on other sites

Guest reefatoon

Wish the bunch of twats would just get this sorted man. I can't remember the last time i looked forward to a season starting. The buzz if it went through before the new season man. The fucking sheer relief of no more doom and gloom.

Link to post
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, ED209 said:

Can we not all just go back to plane spotting? 

That was so much better, like.  IT'S HEADING STRAIGHT FOR RIYADH oh no, it's gone to Bulgaria instead.  Miss those days

Link to post
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Wandy said:

You are actually the worst poster on these takeover threads. At least those who are negative/cynical give reasoning behind their opinions. You just drop in every few days to make the same bullshit statement, knowing fine well it will just irritate everyone, and then bugger off again for a few days. You are a troll.

My articulate response . . . 

:mike:;D

Link to post
Share on other sites

Guest reefatoon
7 minutes ago, Pons Alias said:

Surely some sort of deal could be done to sell to Mandy and the Ruebens and then add the Saudis later?

It's going to be interesting to see how committed and what any future plans are if the arbitration case doesn't go their way. Will things get ugly and carry on, or will it be a case of that's it dead and buried.

Link to post
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, reefatoon said:

It's going to be interesting to see how committed and what any future plans are if the arbitration case doesn't go their way. Will things get ugly and carry on, or will it be a case of that's it dead and buried.

If the Reubens had any intention of doing this it would surely have happened by now.

What happened to Staveleys case against Barlclays btw, did she just lose the whole thing?

Link to post
Share on other sites

I thought Keith made it pretty clear last week that he gets all his craic from QC O’Donoghue. I was a bit worried at first that he had some Micky Mouse solicitor on it, like Warwick Davis and his accountant.

Just a hypothetical... If we steam roller them in count or they fold and agree to settle at the first whiff of disclosure, would your opinion of Keith change? It would after all mean he was right all along - rock solid case, never in doubt etc.

 

 

 

Edited by Candi_Hills

Link to post
Share on other sites

Guest reefatoon
3 minutes ago, mrmojorisin75 said:

If the Reubens had any intention of doing this it would surely have happened by now.

What happened to Staveleys case against Barlclays btw, did she just lose the whole thing?

Yeah, the Reubens clearly don't want overall control and are happy to just have a small percentage. If it does go down the pan and PIF back away for good, you get the feeling Staveley and the Reubans will be out there looking for other investors (which could take god knows how long). We just need this to work, so we as a club can just move on instead of this purgatory we have been stuck in for the last year. One way or another, this just needs ending.

Not sure about Staveley's case, was she going to appeal? 

Link to post
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, Candi_Hills said:

I thought Keith made it pretty clear last week that he gets all his craic from QC O’Donoghue. I was a bit worried at first that he had some Micky Mouse solicitor on it, like Warwick Davis and his accountant.

Just a hypothetical... If we steam roller them in count or they fold and agree to settle at the first whiff of disclosure, would your opinion of Keith change? It would after all mean he was right all along - rock solid case, never in doubt etc.

 

I don't have an issue with the idea that he has some strong evidence that can win the day. It's the way he holds himself that is the problem. He's making himself, and therefore the rest of us, look ridiculous.

Link to post
Share on other sites

22 minutes ago, manorpark said:

My articulate response . . . 

:mike:;D

Every post you make is designed to inflame and irritate. You have absolutely nothing else in your locker. Troll.

Link to post
Share on other sites

8 minutes ago, reefatoon said:

Yeah, the Reubens clearly don't want overall control and are happy to just have a small percentage. If it does go down the pan and PIF back away for good, you get the feeling Staveley and the Reubans will be out there looking for other investors (which could take god knows how long). We just need this to work, so we as a club can just move on instead of this purgatory we have been stuck in for the last year. One way or another, this just needs ending.

Not sure about Staveley's case, was she going to appeal? 

oh jya she lost the lot, doesn't sound worth appealing against either tbh from what the judge said

Link to post
Share on other sites

13 minutes ago, reefatoon said:

Yeah, the Reubens clearly don't want overall control and are happy to just have a small percentage. If it does go down the pan and PIF back away for good, you get the feeling Staveley and the Reubans will be out there looking for other investors (which could take god knows how long). We just need this to work, so we as a club can just move on instead of this purgatory we have been stuck in for the last year. One way or another, this just needs ending.

Not sure about Staveley's case, was she going to appeal? 

Not that we want to envision a world where PIF walk away forever, but I’m wondering how long it will be until Staveley (with or without the Ruebens) decides to try one of those leveraged buyouts the Glazers made look so savvy? 

 

 

Edited by Raconteur

Link to post
Share on other sites

Guest reefatoon

Remember way back last year when this was all looking a formality and we were saying it hadn't been announced yet as the pubs were closed and it would cause chaos. They are obviously just waiting until June 21st before announcing so everyone can celebrate properly. The Premier League were thinking about us the whole time ;)

Link to post
Share on other sites

Guest reefatoon
4 minutes ago, Raconteur said:

Not that we want to envision a world where PIF walk away forever, but I’m wondering how long it will be until Staveley (with or without the Ruebens) decides to try one of those leveraged buyouts the Glazers made look so savvy? 

Just hope she doesn't get that desperate that she goes in for a percentage with Ashley. :harry:

Link to post
Share on other sites

15 minutes ago, Wandy said:

Every post you make is designed to inflame and irritate. You have absolutely nothing else in your locker. Troll.

Yet plenty of people continue to respond and get wound up by it.
You'd think they would learn to deal with it by now. 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
×
×
  • Create New...