Jump to content

Recommended Posts

3 minutes ago, Armchair Pundit said:

And all this is before any precedence is shown in relation to actions towards other clubs, the League are so blatantly inconstant and biased towards their own needs and that of those they are in cahoots with, how can this even be questioned?

 

Perfectly put

Link to post
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Armchair Pundit said:

How contemptable is Lewis with his huffing and eye-rolling, it simply doesn't happen in usual court, I'm not sure why the judge is allowing it to happen now (unless he's completely unaware).


An example of the PL’s arrogance and how they think they are beyond reproach.

Link to post
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Armchair Pundit said:

Lewis really looks like a bloke who is angered at being questioned and is utterly arrogant towards any opposing argument.

He's fucking awful. He may be good at his job, but just comes across as an obnoxious wanker.

Link to post
Share on other sites

SJHL QC saying its wrong to say PIF are still at the table, though this could just be part of his argument regarding loss of sale, etc.

 

But also, confirming even if the PL approved the sale tomorrow, the CAT case may still go forward for costs claim.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...