ponsaelius Posted April 28, 2023 Share Posted April 28, 2023 Fair market value seems such BS. But whatever. Double it in a couple of seasons. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
TBG Posted April 28, 2023 Share Posted April 28, 2023 Thought the average was 9.16cm? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
TBG Posted April 28, 2023 Share Posted April 28, 2023 Sorry wrong forum Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Keegans Export Posted April 28, 2023 Share Posted April 28, 2023 1 minute ago, bowlingcrofty said: Why though? That rule was brought in basically so we didn’t sponsor ourselves through the back door. If it’s not a RPT then surely fair market value is whatever someone is willing to pay. I think they were/are worried about the global "influence" of PIF, that they could encourage a non-related party to go well above market value. These rules stop that from happening (in theory). Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Miggys First Goal Posted April 28, 2023 Share Posted April 28, 2023 1 minute ago, TBG said: Thought the average was 9.16cm? Keep telling yourself that Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
mattypnufc Posted April 28, 2023 Share Posted April 28, 2023 Just now, Keegans Export said: I think they were/are worried about the global "influence" of PIF, that they could encourage a non-related party to go well above market value. These rules stop that from happening (in theory). Fair market value for a team that’s got to a final and potentially/on track to get CL qualification in the biggest league in the world, and has been on telly most weeks. That’s fair market value for now I reckon. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
STM Posted April 28, 2023 Share Posted April 28, 2023 What's annoying for them clubs is that when they cooked up the "fair market value" bullshit, they hadn't envisaged us finishing in the top 4 so quick. Ironically, when we finish 3rd... we should be scrutinising Spurs and Chelseas next commercial deals. "Hold on, Spurs and Chelsea finished in 7th and 10th, there's no way they should be getting so much money." Could backfire rather quickly. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
bowlingcrofty Posted April 28, 2023 Share Posted April 28, 2023 3 minutes ago, Keegans Export said: I think they were/are worried about the global "influence" of PIF, that they could encourage a non-related party to go well above market value. These rules stop that from happening (in theory). Fair enough - can understand that. Still not sure how it would stand up in court like. Seems a very arbitrary way of deciding who can be sponsored what. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Keegans Export Posted April 28, 2023 Share Posted April 28, 2023 Just now, bowlingcrofty said: Fair enough - can understand that. Still not sure how it would stand up in court like. Seems a very arbitrary way of deciding who can be sponsored what. That's exactly what it is Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Miggys First Goal Posted April 28, 2023 Share Posted April 28, 2023 1 minute ago, STM said: What's annoying for them clubs is that when they cooked up the "fair market value" bullshit, they hadn't envisaged us finishing in the top 4 so quick. Ironically, when we finish 3rd... we should be scrutinising Spurs and Chelseas next commercial deals. "Hold on, Spurs and Chelsea finished in 7th and 10th, there's no way they should be getting so much money." Could backfire rather quickly. Chelsea getting that £5 million Wakey Wines sponsorship eventually. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Geordie Ahmed Posted April 28, 2023 Share Posted April 28, 2023 4 minutes ago, STM said: What's annoying for them clubs is that when they cooked up the "fair market value" bullshit, they hadn't envisaged us finishing in the top 4 so quick. Ironically, when we finish 3rd... we should be scrutinising Spurs and Chelseas next commercial deals. "Hold on, Spurs and Chelsea finished in 7th and 10th, there's no way they should be getting so much money." Could backfire rather quickly. This is exactly it, this season has shocked them When Spurs get £40m there is absolutely no way they can object to £25m, it's very modest actually Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Miggys First Goal Posted April 28, 2023 Share Posted April 28, 2023 You know, I some times forget that this is really the first proper full season under this new regime. And look at what we've achieved in such a short period of time. Where are we going to be five years from now? A decade from now? We're actually going to be fucking massive. The sleeping giant has been awoken yet. It's still snoring. They'll all know when the giant is awake. And it will be glorious. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ace Posted April 28, 2023 Share Posted April 28, 2023 7 hours ago, TheHoob said: Hadn't heard of that before but you can see this seasons breakdown here: https://editorial.uefa.com/resources/0277-158b0bea495a-ba6c18158cd3-1000/20220704_circular_2022_47_en.pdf Sliding scale from 1.1ish million to 36ish based on a 10 year coefficient, cool cool. One of a few different pools of payments like Yorkie said, but the joint biggest by the looks of it. anyone who thinks anything UEFA do is for the good of all teams (such as FFP) needs to give their head a shake. It shows how greedy the super league lot were as UEFA do everything to help them in any case Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
ponsaelius Posted April 28, 2023 Share Posted April 28, 2023 (edited) UEFA have made concessions for years to appease out of fear of a breakaway league. It's not them that's the issue, it's the cabal of big clubs who have pushed the agenda. Edited April 28, 2023 by ponsaelius Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
wormy Posted April 28, 2023 Share Posted April 28, 2023 42 minutes ago, STM said: What's annoying for them clubs is that when they cooked up the "fair market value" bullshit, they hadn't envisaged us finishing in the top 4 so quick. Ironically, when we finish 3rd... we should be scrutinising Spurs and Chelseas next commercial deals. "Hold on, Spurs and Chelsea finished in 7th and 10th, there's no way they should be getting so much money." Could backfire rather quickly. Oh my God now I'm just imagining us being able to twist the knife in to these arseholes once we've overtaken them. Thanks for awakening me to this dream. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
TheBrownBottle Posted April 28, 2023 Share Posted April 28, 2023 1 hour ago, ToonAbroad said: Understand it's only a 2 year deal, so gives a decent boost to current numbers but also will not be long to arrange a bigger deal once hopefully two seasons of CL football are under the belt to justify a bigger number. Apparently there was an offer of 22m for 5 years on the table too so this seems like a good outcome I think. Yeah, this is what I’ve been expecting - a series of short term deals which keep jumping up in value by significant amounts. The next one in 2025 will no doubt be in the Spurs / Arsenal / Chelsea category; the one after that in Man City territory. This is why this will take 5-10 years, as the owners said from the off. Howe and the players have hit the accelerator on the plans with what they’ve achieved - I reckon we’ve shaved a year or so off what we thought we’d need. The PIF money will likely be used for infrastructure and loss absorption. Their contacts will be used for getting big sponsorship bucks - which is why I was always puzzled by the assumptions that the sponsors would be Aramco etc at this point. Why draw down more criticism and more eyes when you can easily get the same money elsewhere during the building process? Once we get where we’re going though, I wouldn’t be surprised to see Saudi sponsorship all over the shop - like Man City, whose deals are similar to but just a bit bigger than Man Utd and Liverpool. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ace Posted April 28, 2023 Share Posted April 28, 2023 1 hour ago, ponsaelius said: UEFA have made concessions for years to appease out of fear of a breakaway league. It's not them that's the issue, it's the cabal of big clubs who have pushed the agenda. Uefa are supposed to be in charge though, they’ve allowed the corrupt cabal to dictate to them. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Lazarus Posted April 28, 2023 Share Posted April 28, 2023 Just wait til we add in our official mattress partner - then the chocolate partner, tractor partner, official cambodian beer partner and wipe wipes for men partner. Theres ways to inflate overall income. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
PauloGeordio Posted April 28, 2023 Share Posted April 28, 2023 Just now, Lazarus said: Just wait til we add in our official mattress partner - then the chocolate partner, tractor partner, official cambodian beer partner and wipe wipes for men partner. Theres ways to inflate overall income. Training ground sponsor, Stadium associate! Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ace Posted April 28, 2023 Share Posted April 28, 2023 Thought our deal would be closer to spuds. it’s a bit bullshit when Boehly will probably give Chelsea a 100m a year deal for corner flag sponsorship from Todd Boehly craft figurines or some bollocks like that to cover them Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
geordie_b Posted April 28, 2023 Share Posted April 28, 2023 33 minutes ago, Lazarus said: Just wait til we add in our official mattress partner - then the chocolate partner, tractor partner, official cambodian beer partner and wipe wipes for men partner. Theres ways to inflate overall income. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
MagMal Posted April 28, 2023 Share Posted April 28, 2023 7 minutes ago, geordie_b said: Is that not just Harry Maguire? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mazzy Posted April 28, 2023 Share Posted April 28, 2023 Genuine question. Why would we choose to be sponsored by a company outside of Saudi? I could understand somewhat if it were a British/well known Worldwide company but being sponsored by another Middle Eastern countries company seems peculiar. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
gdm Posted April 28, 2023 Share Posted April 28, 2023 1 minute ago, Mazzy said: Genuine question. Why would we choose to be sponsored by a company outside of Saudi? I could understand somewhat if it were a British/well known Worldwide company but being sponsored by another Middle Eastern countries company seems peculiar. Reduce the scrutiny perhaps Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Scotty66 Posted April 28, 2023 Share Posted April 28, 2023 Wonder if it's someone PIF have investments in? How would that work and would that be treated the same way as a PIF owned company? Obviously win win for PIF as even if they don't own the company their shares will increase with our exposure you would expect. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now