Pablo Posted June 25 Share Posted June 25 Yes Girona are completely independent of Man City, just ask Savio. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
nufc123 Posted June 25 Share Posted June 25 11 minutes ago, Keegans Export said: It says that Nice & Girona are being run as a "blind trust" which basically means being run completely independently of Man Utd and Man City respectively. Although they do literally have the same owners so it's not exactly the same. But that doesn't fit the "Big, bad Newcastle out to ruin football" narrative... New rules incoming.. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
ExiledGeordie Posted June 25 Share Posted June 25 Be funny if/when the premier league start to shit it when players start leaving for the continent when clubs can’t afford wages and transfer fees (see Olise situation). Rules would soon change then. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
GeordieDazzler Posted June 25 Share Posted June 25 Aren’t Girona 50% owned by Pare Guardiola (Peps Bro)? Can Andy Howe not just buy a stake in Monaco? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jack27 Posted June 25 Share Posted June 25 So we’re not even allowed to set up a MCO? Blimey Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Miggys First Goal Posted June 25 Share Posted June 25 Fold the club. No point in even trying. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
TBG Posted June 25 Share Posted June 25 So they can afford another club but can't afford Calvert-Lewin? Ermmm priorities much!? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
TK-421 Posted June 25 Share Posted June 25 Key line in the article seems to be this... Quote Although the Saudi Public Investment Fund (PIF), which owns Newcastle, would not be part of any purchase, there could be enough of a link that would result in Monaco being viewed by Uefa as part of a multi-club ownership (MCO) structure with Newcastle. How can it be a problem then, if the PIF, our owners are 'not part of any purchase'??? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Fezzle Posted June 25 Share Posted June 25 59 minutes ago, TK-421 said: Key line in the article seems to be this... How can it be a problem then, if the PIF, our owners are 'not part of any purchase'??? Despite the countless occasions of the sky 6 using their feeder clubs they are genuinely shit scared of things we have nothing to do with. Meanwhile the sky 6 continues to do what they are scared we will do 🤣 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Likelylad Posted June 25 Share Posted June 25 It's obviously more understated these days but there's a real active anger/frustration both in the media and from other clubs that our takeover went through. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
TheBrownBottle Posted June 25 Share Posted June 25 I’ve no issue with MCO being blocked in Europe tbh. Obviously that should also apply to clubs who already are in one, too. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
huss9 Posted June 26 Share Posted June 26 get sponsoring, Yasir!!!!! Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ben Posted June 27 Share Posted June 27 Did Man City win their case ? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
r0cafella Posted June 27 Share Posted June 27 8 minutes ago, Ben said: Did Man City win their case ? We don’t know the verdict yet. It’s also interesting that we were meant to have more sponsors lined up but still nothing has been announced I wonder if these two issues are related. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
et tu brute Posted June 27 Share Posted June 27 55 minutes ago, r0cafella said: We don’t know the verdict yet. It’s also interesting that we were meant to have more sponsors lined up but still nothing has been announced I wonder if these two issues are related. I'm gobsmacked that there have been no leaks with the case. It's a good week at least since I've seen or heard any media stories concerning the case. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
r0cafella Posted June 27 Share Posted June 27 10 minutes ago, et tu brute said: I'm gobsmacked that there have been no leaks with the case. It's a good week at least since I've seen or heard any media stories concerning the case. Makes sense as it’s basically lawyers who wouldn’t want to risk leaking anything for obvious reasons. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
nufcnick Posted June 27 Share Posted June 27 37 minutes ago, et tu brute said: I'm gobsmacked that there have been no leaks with the case. It's a good week at least since I've seen or heard any media stories concerning the case. 27 minutes ago, r0cafella said: Makes sense as it’s basically lawyers who wouldn’t want to risk leaking anything for obvious reasons. Had it gone really well for the Premier League, you would think leaks would have came out from the usual suspects, so I’m hoping the silence means it has gone badly for the sly fuckers Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
r0cafella Posted June 27 Share Posted June 27 2 minutes ago, nufcnick said: Had it gone really well for the Premier League, you would think leaks would have came out from the usual suspects, so I’m hoping the silence means it has gone badly for the sly fuckers Fingers crossed. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
TheBrownBottle Posted June 27 Share Posted June 27 They wouldn’t know the judgement until it’s made - there wouldn’t be anything to leak Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
SUPERTOON Posted June 27 Share Posted June 27 41 minutes ago, TheBrownBottle said: They wouldn’t know the judgement until it’s made - there wouldn’t be anything to leak You could say the same about our takeover in fairness and we all know how many leaks there was. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
TheBrownBottle Posted June 27 Share Posted June 27 49 minutes ago, SUPERTOON said: You could say the same about our takeover in fairness and we all know how many leaks there was. True, but that was the PL making the decision - the arbitrator will make a decision here. Both sets of lawyers will have presented their case, but they would have no clue as to the outcome until the judgement is given. I’ve been through arbitration and adjudication a number of times - no matter how confident you are, you’re none the wiser until the decision is given. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
r0cafella Posted June 27 Share Posted June 27 Waugh has dropped a quota filing piece on the athletic for those with nothing else better to do. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Nucasol Posted June 27 Share Posted June 27 2 hours ago, r0cafella said: Waugh has dropped a quota filing piece on the athletic for those with nothing else better to do. Rather cheesegrate my nuts. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dr Jinx Posted June 28 Share Posted June 28 New agreement signed with BetMGM, if there is really a deficit of 25m to make up, it won’t cover it all but it would certainly give us the option to make up the difference by offloading a player with less value than what our star players or someone like Minteh would fetch. Wilson or Trippier leaving soon? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jack27 Posted July 2 Share Posted July 2 we have some catching up to do Peter Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now