Alberto2005 Posted Sunday at 21:09 Share Posted Sunday at 21:09 On a serious note, hard to see them going for anyone else. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
gbandit Posted Sunday at 21:10 Share Posted Sunday at 21:10 They could go for Potter for sure Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Whitley mag Posted Sunday at 21:15 Share Posted Sunday at 21:15 Unless he is unsettled by the boardroom changes not a chance he leaves us for England. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
500bhp Posted Sunday at 21:15 Share Posted Sunday at 21:15 6 minutes ago, Miggys First Goal said: Nee Steve Bruce 😃😃 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Fountain Posted Sunday at 21:16 Share Posted Sunday at 21:16 I think Eddie will be first choice. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gawalls Posted Sunday at 21:28 Share Posted Sunday at 21:28 12 minutes ago, The Fountain said: I think Eddie will be first choice. I think they’ll offer it to Potter as he’s managed down south and not in the North East Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Menace Posted Sunday at 21:31 Share Posted Sunday at 21:31 Potter really isn't that much of an improvement on Southgate.. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Danh1 Posted Sunday at 21:33 Share Posted Sunday at 21:33 Would lose all respect for him. He is a manager who is of high quality but also still young in managerial terms. Would be a pathetic, spineless move. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dr Jinx Posted Sunday at 21:33 Share Posted Sunday at 21:33 1 minute ago, Menace said: Potter really isn't that much of an improvement on Southgate.. Yes he is. Don't let a poorly chosen move to a poisonous football club distract you from that. Brighton were a nightmare to play against while he was there. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Danh1 Posted Sunday at 21:34 Share Posted Sunday at 21:34 2 minutes ago, Menace said: Potter really isn't that much of an improvement on Southgate.. I think he is. Southgate is poor tactically and didn’t really put in place a style of football. Potter would do that. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
STM Posted Sunday at 21:34 Share Posted Sunday at 21:34 They can want him all they want. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
James Posted Sunday at 21:34 Share Posted Sunday at 21:34 A few barriers to overcome but I think Klopp would be great for England Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Nine Posted Sunday at 21:35 Share Posted Sunday at 21:35 (edited) I’ll say it again, the limited time he would have with a national team is so far away from this guys style and ethos that on the surface it just would not make sense. You can’t drill a team to play his football when only seeing the players twice every couple of months.. to make the point I think it’s a big reason why Southgate is so passive in his style, although he has his limitations as a manger it also suits tournament football because it’s much easier to drill a team to a simplistic style when you don’t have the time available. Edited Sunday at 21:37 by Nine Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
nemtizz Posted Sunday at 21:38 Share Posted Sunday at 21:38 Vile bump Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Danh1 Posted Sunday at 21:39 Share Posted Sunday at 21:39 4 minutes ago, James said: A few barriers to overcome but I think Klopp would be great for England Would sicken the Micky Mousers too. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
madras Posted Sunday at 21:41 Share Posted Sunday at 21:41 4 minutes ago, Nine said: I’ll say it again, the limited time he would have with a national team is so far away from this guys style and ethos that on the surface it just would not make sense. You can’t drill a team to play his football when only seeing the players twice every couple of months.. to make the point I think it’s a big reason why Southgate is so passive in his style, although he has his limitations as a manger it also suits tournament football because it’s much easier to drill a team to a simplistic style when you don’t have the time available. Really ? How come other teams manage a high press ? And to think most of the players he has play for teams who use a high press ...... so why wont/can't he ? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
gbandit Posted Sunday at 21:41 Share Posted Sunday at 21:41 I dislike Klopp a great deal but with these players he wins an international tournament Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Menace Posted Sunday at 21:42 Share Posted Sunday at 21:42 8 minutes ago, Dr Jinx said: Yes he is. Don't let a poorly chosen move to a poisonous football club distract you from that. Brighton were a nightmare to play against while he was there. Yet Brighton fans weren't really fussed about losing him Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Danh1 Posted Sunday at 21:46 Share Posted Sunday at 21:46 2 minutes ago, Menace said: Yet Brighton fans weren't really fussed about losing him I may be wrong but I’m sure they were saying how if they had a decent striker they’d have been devastating. I remember that as when we were looking to bring in the poisonous dwarf they were saying he didn’t have an eye for a decent forward. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Nine Posted Sunday at 21:46 Share Posted Sunday at 21:46 2 minutes ago, madras said: Really ? How come other teams manage a high press ? And to think most of the players he has play for teams who use a high press ...... so why wont/can't he ? It’s not a case of can’t or won’t, personally I think he tries to play to his own strengths because he is aware he has his limitations.. however his track record has proved that his style is effective at national level. A better manager of course could squeeze a lot more out of that level of attacking talent, hopefully we get to see that before long. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Stifler Posted Sunday at 21:46 Share Posted Sunday at 21:46 8 minutes ago, Nine said: I’ll say it again, the limited time he would have with a national team is so far away from this guys style and ethos that on the surface it just would not make sense. You can’t drill a team to play his football when only seeing the players twice every couple of months.. to make the point I think it’s a big reason why Southgate is so passive in his style, although he has his limitations as a manger it also suits tournament football because it’s much easier to drill a team to a simplistic style when you don’t have the time available. This is it. He isn’t suited to international football, you could say the same for Rafa, and Mourinho. They need time to bed in their philosophy, look at Hall, a year to get a game, even only did because of injuries, even though Howe see’s him as someone for the future. I can’t see him going even if the FA asked about him, but even if he did, he’d be making a huge mistake. The FA will go for someone who won’’t cause a fuss, who’ll pick the players at big clubs who’ll sell a few more England shirts, any sort of progress or success is secondary to them. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
madras Posted Sunday at 21:49 Share Posted Sunday at 21:49 (edited) 3 minutes ago, Nine said: It’s not a case of can’t or won’t, personally I think he tries to play to his own strengths because he is aware he has his limitations.. however his track record has proved that his style is effective at national level. A better manager of course could squeeze a lot more out of that level of attacking talent, hopefully we get to see that before long. I'm not sure if it is effective, yes we've made 2 finals and a semi but we've not been convincing and been lucky in the draws, especially given the strength of squad he has at hand. Edited Sunday at 21:50 by madras Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Prophet Posted Sunday at 21:50 Share Posted Sunday at 21:50 Hard to see the FA having the cash or the ambition to make a serious go at recruiting Howe. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Optimistic Nut Posted Sunday at 21:52 Share Posted Sunday at 21:52 Scrap having a FT manager and go big on some sort of Technical Director who'll study international opposition inside-out, then go for a Head Coach and pick a squad based on form/the opposition on a game-by-game basis. Would make international football a helluva lot more interesting. You could then go for top-class managers knowing they'd only be away from their clubs for 10 days at a time, etc. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dr Jinx Posted Sunday at 21:53 Share Posted Sunday at 21:53 2 minutes ago, Menace said: Yet Brighton fans weren't really fussed about losing him That says more about Brighton fans. Potter is a good coach and has tactical style that is effective. Totally comfortable passing out from the back and patient. The only thing is him not being a particularly well known name.. is he going to command the respect of certain young players with egos etc. Him being out of the game a while now won't do him any favours. It'll be Howe they go for imho.. but not yet. Which is why I think someone like Carsley will get the job in a "caretaker role" Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now