Jump to content

Do you still back Eddie Howe?  

735 members have voted

  1. 1. ?

    • Yes
      117
    • No
      92


Recommended Posts

the whole transfer side of things need a serious review. DoF needs to dictate on direction with input from Howe of course, but if we want an assistant to Howe as a DoF it wont work. let Howe concentrate on getting the best out of the players, he done very well on that side, and let a DoF bring in proper talents.

 

Andy Howe can take a step back.

 

we need a DoF with balls, but also with an eye for a talent and for the market so Howe can trust him and not try to control him.

 

the power vacuum created by lack of action of PIF didnt result in a great summer window at a time when was the exact time to strike while the iron is hot. letting Man Utd and Spurs especially to close the gap on us in the league is the polar opposite we should be doing. them being shit and far away from top4 is our big chance to solidify ourselves in top4/top5 which is crucial as if now next two season we dont get into CL as we just finish 6th or 7th two in a row our revenues take a hit again, we cannot grow sponsors, top players may do what Isak doing now without even being to say but we offer CL ...

Link to post
Share on other sites

He’s just an immensely positive person. I think it’s easy to get wrapped up in these sagas playing out on Twitter but ultimately there’s about 4 weeks left and things will start moving. We’ve got our list (don’t we fucking know it) and he’ll be confident of filling the spots by the end of the month. 

Link to post
Share on other sites

I don't get this comment...

 

Could the club tell him he has to stay?

‘It’s not that straightforward, otherwise we would have done that a long time ago,’ said Howe. ‘I don’t think we’re in a position to be able to do that currently.’

Link to post
Share on other sites

31 minutes ago, duo said:

I don't get this comment...

 

Could the club tell him he has to stay?

‘It’s not that straightforward, otherwise we would have done that a long time ago,’ said Howe. ‘I don’t think we’re in a position to be able to do that currently.’

That's seriously worrying like.

 

At least it sort of answers a question a lot of us have, even if it does raise loads of new ones

Link to post
Share on other sites

Just now, Kid Icarus said:

That's seriously worrying like.

 

At least it sort of answers a question a lot of us have, even if it does raise loads of new ones


What’s your interpretation of that? 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Just now, Kid Icarus said:

That's seriously worrying like.

 

At least it sort of answers a question a lot of us have, even if it does raise loads of new ones

It's obviously not true is why your conflicted :lol:

 

We can obviously force him to stay, the ground is being prepared. 

Link to post
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, r0cafella said:

It's obviously not true is why your conflicted :lol:

 

We can obviously force him to stay, the ground is being prepared. 

It's not obviously anything, there are plenty of potential legal reasons we might not be able to enforce it.

Link to post
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Kid Icarus said:

It's not obviously anything, there are plenty of potential legal reasons we might not be able to enforce it.

Legal reason? Such as?

 

Any legal action would take a very long time to resolve itself and we can Bankrupt the twerp. Bring the legal action in here for it. 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Just now, r0cafella said:

Legal reason? Such as?

 

Any legal action would take a very long time to resolve itself and we can Bankrupt the twerp. Bring the legal action in here for it. 

Liverpool would never support that kind of legal action. As soon as it becomes precedent that players can break contracts then transfer fees from English clubs become worthless

Link to post
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, r0cafella said:

Legal reason? Such as?

 

Any legal action would take a very long time to resolve itself and we can Bankrupt the twerp. Bring the legal action in here for it. 

It was a player suing Newcastle which destroyed the old ‘retain and transfer’ system.  Seems apropos if history repeats to destroy the player registration system. 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Just now, r0cafella said:

Legal reason? Such as?

 

Any legal action would take a very long time to resolve itself and we can Bankrupt the twerp. Bring the legal action in here for it. 

Such as a witnessed gentleman's agreement, contract terms that stipulate situations eg if club X come in then something comes into play, or us just outright breaking the terms of the contract, plus plenty of other possibilities. 

 

For the latter part that sounds unrealistic unless the action was against another club rather than Isak himself. 

Link to post
Share on other sites

10 minutes ago, Kid Icarus said:

That's seriously worrying like.

 

At least it sort of answers a question a lot of us have, even if it does raise loads of new ones

He still didn’t have to say that. He could have deflected and said that “Isak currently is a Newcastle player” and left it at that, right?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...