Jump to content

Sven Botman back late December/early January 'at the earliest' (Howe)


Recommended Posts

7 hours ago, greydos said:

I know this is ambitious and would likely cost loads of money, but could you make a small flag of all the players  and staff the size of the ones with 2 poles (they look about 3m by 2m on the tv,  it been to a game since Wolves last year), and give them out to the full gallowgate stand to recreate one of the dressing room photos?

We could do, but we actually have a dressing room image already too which we've used. Could be a shout though.

Link to post
Share on other sites

On 29/10/2022 at 22:11, KaKa said:

Imagine how happy this guy must be with the decision he made man.

 

So glad it's working out so incredibly well for him. What a signing.

It’s great isn’t it! Life is full of tricky decisions and their consequences ?

Spoiler

DA65BB85-E50D-403C-90AD-59F081E452BD.jpeg.2a5593102d5a88ae5c842df14337e132.jpeg

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Wait a second, the Mail are now charging for people to read the absolute divisive hate-ridden drivel that the spew out? That's actually fucking hilarious, who the fuck would actually pay for that shite :lol:

Link to post
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Dr.Spaceman said:

Really like this bloke. He's everything we wanted him to be and more - reads the game well, composed on the ball, good passer and already looks like he has the physical attributes to go far. All that at the age of 22!

 

And all for the same price we flogged Andy Carroll for 11 years ago. 

Link to post
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, Kanji said:

Botman - Virgil - De Ligt at the WC for me. 

Cant instantly recall a tidier, classier three at the back.

Come a long way since the omni-shambles of Koeman and Van Gobbel

Link to post
Share on other sites

4 hours ago, Jonas said:

Cant instantly recall a tidier, classier three at the back.

Come a long way since the omni-shambles of Koeman and Van Gobbel

 

I don’t know how or why they’d drop De Vrij, Ake or Timber in any of those positions next to Virgil….the 3 I listed would literally destroy any attacker in front of them. 

Link to post
Share on other sites

28 minutes ago, Kanji said:

 

I don’t know how or why they’d drop De Vrij, Ake or Timber in any of those positions next to Virgil….the 3 I listed would literally destroy any attacker in front of them. 

I've never been persuaded by Ake. Don't know enough about the other two.

Link to post
Share on other sites

9 hours ago, Facundo Ferreyra said:

 

And all for the same price we flogged Andy Carroll for 11 years ago. 

I know it upset many at the time, but that was one of the few sales where I'd have been like Ashley - bundling him into the helicopter and taking Dalglish's stupid offer.  Carroll always looked like a 'purple patch' player to me.  Difference is I would have reinvested it.

 

Oh, and Botman is a bargain at 35m - what a player.

Link to post
Share on other sites

image.thumb.png.f34184aafde8106558d0b71bba680c59.png

 

From centre backs, only Ake ahead of Botman on xThreat from passes (basically how dangerous their passes are), and Man City players are always at an advantage from how much possession they have. Amazing.

 

Trippier :cool:

Link to post
Share on other sites

40 minutes ago, Chris_R said:

How can you be in negative numbers? What does that represent, giving the ball away which creates an opposition chance?

More or less, aye. Creating more danger for your own team or moving towards your own goal.

 

 

Edited by Smal

Link to post
Share on other sites

44 minutes ago, Chris_R said:

How can you be in negative numbers? What does that represent, giving the ball away which creates an opposition chance?

I would expect it just means performing actions that reduce your team's xg e.g. receiving the ball with your back to goal, being blocked and playing a pass back to deeper midfield to retain possession. Rather than actively increasing your opposition's chance of a goal.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...