KennyUtd Posted April 23 Share Posted April 23 Just mental how they keep telling themselves that they're a great investment for somebody with loads of money. When has this ever been the case for them? Billionaires weren't queueing up when they were in the Prem nevermind now. Loads of other clubs would be a better proposition than those fucks. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Pilko Posted April 23 Share Posted April 23 Weird time to sell, weeks before the playoffs, makes absolutely no sense. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Terrymac1966 Posted April 23 Share Posted April 23 So how does nobody else know about it except this one bloke 🙈 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
KennyUtd Posted April 23 Share Posted April 23 I see the "Newcastle's a shit hole" thread has been parsnipped now too. Vile bunch of arseholes. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
NE27 Posted April 23 Share Posted April 23 4 minutes ago, Terrymac1966 said: So how does nobody else know about it except this one bloke 🙈  Sleuthing on N-O/nufc social media consists of scouring companies house, checking chartered flights and their passengers. Scrutinising bread pictures and watching court cases.  Ready to groom happily go with "trust me, I heard it from a mate FTM SMB 9-1" Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Chris_R Posted April 23 Share Posted April 23 19 minutes ago, KennyUtd said: Just mental how they keep telling themselves that they're a great investment for somebody with loads of money. When has this ever been the case for them? Billionaires weren't queueing up when they were in the Prem nevermind now. Loads of other clubs would be a better proposition than those fucks. Â They were owned by a billionaire. Â He invested shitloads into them, sold them, and turned himself into a millionaire. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
KennyUtd Posted April 23 Share Posted April 23 24 minutes ago, Chris_R said: Â They were owned by a billionaire. Â He invested shitloads into them, sold them, and turned himself into a millionaire. That is true. Forgot how rich Ellis Short was. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Elric Posted April 23 Share Posted April 23 Delewsion is our identity, marra Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
ikri Posted April 23 Share Posted April 23 1 hour ago, sleazy said:  Firstly they don't seem to realise the EFL Cup is not part of the debate.  Secondly - richer than PIF????  Suddenly fewmin rights aren't so important  They wouldn't get it in any case. There's no way to figure out where players might have moved to which other clubs or what results might have been different in the absence of City. If they hadn't played Man City in the final they could have ended up losing against Liverpool, Arsenal or any of the other big teams. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
GEFAFWISP Posted April 23 Share Posted April 23 8 minutes ago, ikri said:  They wouldn't get it in any case. There's no way to figure out where players might have moved to which other clubs or what results might have been different in the absence of City. If they hadn't played Man City in the final they could have ended up losing against Liverpool, Arsenal or any of the other big teams. Also the mackems winning the cup (on a technicality that won't be happening anyways...) "before" Newcastle doesn't remove any shine off our achievements except in their obsesses heads. Only time them winning it would be bad is if they slapped us to do it. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
pinkeye Posted April 23 Share Posted April 23 Mackelogically they will presume that they are the default winners regardless of whether it was officially ratified - in the event of Man City being stripped of any silverware that was won during the period they are being investigated over their strange financial activities. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tross Posted April 23 Share Posted April 23 Â Â Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bunk Moreland Posted April 23 Share Posted April 23 (edited) 13 minutes ago, Tross said:    This will never not be hilarious Even more hilariously, this was a whole thread where they went through every English club they were linked to one by one - with even Palace making the list - with no mention at all of Sunderland    Edited April 23 by Bunk Moreland Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Elric Posted April 23 Share Posted April 23 (edited) 1 hour ago, pinkeye said: Mackelogically they will presume that they are the default winners regardless of whether it was officially ratified - in the event of Man City being stripped of any silverware that was won during the period they are being investigated over their strange financial activities.  The fucking irony if that happened though, having the mostest hewge asterisk going next to your only (worthwhile) trophy for generations, marra Edited April 23 by Elric Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Teslact Posted April 23 Share Posted April 23 Do the EFL even have APT rules etc for participation in the League Cup? I doubt the EFL have the money to drag this out again after the PL. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
geordiesteve710 Posted April 23 Share Posted April 23 3 hours ago, pinkeye said: Mackelogically they will presume that they are the default winners regardless of whether it was officially ratified - in the event of Man City being stripped of any silverware that was won during the period they are being investigated over their strange financial activities. Would be hilarious that. Just like Leeds pretending they have won a European Cup but infinitely more smalltime. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
bhoywhonder Posted April 23 Share Posted April 23 (edited) 3 hours ago, Bunk Moreland said:  This will never not be hilarious Even more hilariously, this was a whole thread where they went through every English club they were linked to one by one - with even Palace making the list - with no mention at all of Sunderland         Oh that is superb! How could they have made such a glaring omission?! The Bilbao Black Cats will all be fewming tonight... Both of them. Edited April 23 by bhoywhonder Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
RS Posted April 23 Share Posted April 23 They don’t often mention that they were once fined a record amount (albeit the previous record fine was given to us) and relegated due to financial irregumarraties.   Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dokko Posted April 23 Share Posted April 23 4 hours ago, Tross said:    They'll try and lay claim to anything, regardless how far fetched, and when hit with reality, brush it off or twist it to fit.  Shocked due to their shipbuilding roots they haven't lay claim to marratime law. Originally from the docks on the wear, where MLF were so fucking hard, what they said goes, including at sea, and the king at the time came up to sunderland to beg if he could use it and adopt it across the worlds seas. After agreeing to adopt red and white on the flag of England in return, marratime law was created; only the southern cunts couldn't understand them and by the time they reached London it landed as maritime law.  Rest is history. Etc... Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Elbel1 Posted April 23 Share Posted April 23 5 hours ago, ikri said:  They wouldn't get it in any case. There's no way to figure out where players might have moved to which other clubs or what results might have been different in the absence of City. If they hadn't played Man City in the final they could have ended up losing against Liverpool, Arsenal or any of the other big teams. I'd say a bigger reason they won't be awarded the cup is because Man City are being charged by the Premier League who have no control over the League Cup Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Danh1 Posted April 23 Share Posted April 23 Â Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Optimistic Nut Posted April 23 Share Posted April 23 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
NE27 Posted April 23 Share Posted April 23 To have such a connection on one side and it not be reciprocated tells you everything you need to know about safc fans and their fantasies. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Heron Posted April 23 Share Posted April 23 2 hours ago, RS said: They don’t often mention that they were once fined a record amount (albeit the previous record fine was given to us) and relegated due to financial irregumarraties.   Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Wolfcastle Posted April 23 Share Posted April 23 (edited) That they so desperatey want something to be true that isn't and would be no more than adopting a similar colour/design shirt anyway is tragic stuff. There probably will be some club somewhere that did copy the mackems shirt design and every other English clubs (Real Madrid copied Corinthian's ffs) but something as simple as typing 'Bilbao original colours' into google gives the Southampton based student story (and the fact its the City's colours) Edited April 25 by Wolfcastle Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now