Heron Posted January 11 Share Posted January 11 2 hours ago, bhoywhonder said: Apart from SAFC's 'step on as many PR rakes as possible' run-up to the game, the absolute not-even-out-of-first-gear shoeing we gave them on the pitch, and the next-level trolling of taking the dressing-room victory pic in their fucking 6-yard box...My highlight has to be the absolute capitulation of their shite tifo organisation 'Spirit of Copy Wor Flags'. These arrogant twatcakes have been giving it the big-un without delivering for a good few years now. Constantly accusing WF of being club-funded, then taking club funds at the first opportunity, producing what can only be described as a drink-imposed lazy lob-on of a pre-match display, pocketing the change and then disbanding and fucking off. Lads, you really have encapsulated the 'spirit' of sunderland afc: Being shameless grifting shithouses. You won't be missed (because you were barely noticed in the first place) Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Izakaya Posted January 12 Share Posted January 12 4 hours ago, midds said: That's a scandalous rumour, completely untrue mate It was Staropramen Marraetti and Marrapramen Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
TheBrownBottle Posted January 12 Share Posted January 12 6 hours ago, Jonas said: Love making malicious calls and wasting good people's time do makems ‘You are no nearer to catching me now …’ Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
RS Posted January 12 Share Posted January 12 57 minutes ago, TheBrownBottle said: ‘You are no nearer to catching me now …’ Ah, now the spirit of 73 display makes sense. It was ‘WeArSide j’ and they ran out of bacofoil funding for the ‘ack’! Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ben Posted January 12 Share Posted January 12 They want £20 million for Clark ? Did he even touch the ball on Saturday? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sima Posted January 12 Share Posted January 12 Just now, Ben said: They want £20 million for Clark ? Did he even touch the ball on Saturday? Only thing I remember him doing is heading the ball short so Isak could nick it in the lead up to the penalty. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dancing Brave Posted January 12 Share Posted January 12 mackems wrong again. Firm wrongly targeted with abuse over derby signs https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/articles/c9e2l2pdj72o Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
RS Posted January 12 Share Posted January 12 Still fewmin https://www.readytogo.net/smb/threads/reaction-to-mag-signs-in-black-cats-bar.1624716/ Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
FloydianMag Posted January 12 Share Posted January 12 9 minutes ago, Dancing Brave said: mackems wrong again. Firm wrongly targeted with abuse over derby signs https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/articles/c9e2l2pdj72o Gangsta Club Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sima Posted January 12 Share Posted January 12 (edited) 21 minutes ago, RS said: Still fewmin https://www.readytogo.net/smb/threads/reaction-to-mag-signs-in-black-cats-bar.1624716/ The gave the whole of the other end to Everton a few years back and there would undoubtedly have been ST holders there then. Can’t remember what they did when Man Utd came up there for the LC semi final. It’s only because it’s us, the absolute roasters. Admittedly, decking out their corporate in our colours was an absolutely mental move but I’m not having any criticism of them giving us extra tickets as per the the cup rules. Edited January 12 by Sima Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Paully Posted January 12 Share Posted January 12 35 minutes ago, Ben said: They want £20 million for Clark ? Did he even touch the ball on Saturday? Laughable isn't it? The same price we got for ASM Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Nucasol Posted January 12 Share Posted January 12 35 minutes ago, Dancing Brave said: mackems wrong again. Firm wrongly targeted with abuse over derby signs https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/articles/c9e2l2pdj72o Sugar Puff boycott mentality still strong in the next gen of wierdsiders. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
SteV Posted January 12 Share Posted January 12 43 minutes ago, Sima said: The gave the whole of the other end to Everton a few years back and there would undoubtedly have been ST holders there then. Can’t remember what they did when Man Utd came up there for the LC semi final. It’s only because it’s us, the absolute roasters. Admittedly, decking out their corporate in our colours was an absolutely mental move but I’m not having any criticism of them giving us extra tickets as per the the cup rules. Of course it is. Here’s Hartlepool with between 9k - 10k there. https://youtu.be/nPshmy6Dk6s?si=ZKxa60w3h_LLxUyW Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
OCOCOL Posted January 12 Share Posted January 12 3 hours ago, SteV said: Of course it is. Here’s Hartlepool with between 9k - 10k there. https://youtu.be/nPshmy6Dk6s?si=ZKxa60w3h_LLxUyW The other factor is the other games where they've given large allocations (even Man Ure) have not attracted the demand for tickets. A game versus us is simply a bigger draw and a bigger game. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sima Posted January 12 Share Posted January 12 Aye. 31.5K of which a big chunk would have been Man Utd fans. "SUNLUN TIL' I DIE" Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Disco Posted January 12 Share Posted January 12 JACKEREEYNEEY Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dr.Spaceman Posted January 12 Share Posted January 12 He was a good player, fuck knows what he was doing there. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Paully Posted January 12 Share Posted January 12 Beautifully put! https://true-faith.co.uk/pass-and-move-a-week-of-newcastle-united-12-jan-23/ Sign o’ the Times It’s Friday morning and I’m still reading stuff about the scudding United handed out to the Mackems on their patch. There has been a lot of talk about the team photo taken post-match in front of the Jason Tindall Stand (aka North Stand) with some media gobshites piling in to give us their unwanted opinions. Strangely there has been less coverage of the misogynistic abuse hurled in the direction of Amanda Staveley (complete with disgusting flag) in ignorance of the Huntingdon’s Disease which she suffers from. We’ve almost become used to the abuse rained down on Alan Shearer and long in the tooth Mags remember the “Jackie Is Dead” chanting from the Fulwell End in the early 90s and not to mention the abuse towards Sir Bobby Robson “he’s nearly dead”, “he’s pissed himself” and latterly the poison towards Gary Speed tragedy. Additionally there has been little coverage of the Islamophobic and racist abuse to go the way of Ms Staveley’s husband Mehrdad Ghodoussi on account of his Iranian heritage and a wider pig ignorant stereotyping of Saudis as terrorists. This is all weaponised by the FTM goon squad but I ask the question would it be brushed under the account had we Mags been the protagonists? I seriously doubt it. Those of us with long memories know The Guardian would have been all over it. It seems hate-chanting gets a pass so as long as it’s from a club you like. However, it is perhaps no bad thing key members of United’s board of directors have been given an insight into the bitter and toxic nature of the worst element’s Sunderland’s support. Vengeance is a dish best tasted cold etc. There was more bitter weirdness in the aftermath of the game when Sunderland’s army of anonymous trolls targeted the company they believed were responsible for the signage at the Black Cats bar last week which caused thousands of heads to drop off in perhaps one of football’s best over-reactions in memory. The intention of the abuse and trolling is obviously to damage the sign company’s business – regardless of whether they employed Sunderland supporters or not – they would likely be collateral damage in the warped logic of those attacking a local, independent business that provides employment in the NE. Is it any wonder loads of Mags hope we never have to clap eyes on them for a very long time. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jonas Posted January 12 Share Posted January 12 6 hours ago, Sima said: The gave the whole of the other end to Everton a few years back and there would undoubtedly have been ST holders there then. Can’t remember what they did when Man Utd came up there for the LC semi final. Wonder where the got the idea from to move away fans to the upper tier.?. Consequently they've ended up not really having a home end. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Wallsendmag Posted January 12 Share Posted January 12 5 hours ago, SteV said: Of course it is. Here’s Hartlepool with between 9k - 10k there. https://youtu.be/nPshmy6Dk6s?si=ZKxa60w3h_LLxUyW 9k Hartlepool there that day. No issues with season ticket holders being shifted for that one. Anyone would think they are only kicking off because it was us they needed to move for. Aside from that if you take their last 20 or so home cup ties, the stand where we were put in wasn't even opened up for for over 50% of them and season ticket holders in there had to move to the East Stand so it's hardly like it's unprecedented. It happens more often than not. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Wolfcastle Posted January 12 Share Posted January 12 When they gave us 6-8k tickets in 2006 that had to inconvenience by their logic thousands of fans because they're so well and loyally supported but in reality maybe only a few hundred since they only got over 40k twice that season. Was less home fans at that game than our intertoto/preseason game under Souness at the start of that season. Never heard hide nor hair about their match thread. Be interested to see if that spenk Roker Mackem watched it since he brands everyone that makes a football related comment about us or watches our games as being 'sportswashed'. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mills and Boon Posted January 12 Share Posted January 12 15 hours ago, Dancing Brave said: mackems wrong again. Firm wrongly targeted with abuse over derby signs https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/articles/c9e2l2pdj72o The poor, simple bastards can't get a single thing right can they? I'd feel sorry for them if they weren't so repellent Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bishops Finger Posted January 12 Share Posted January 12 On 11/01/2024 at 23:12, Jonas said: Love making malicious calls and wasting good people's time do makems Even going as far as pretending to be the Yorkshire ripper for a bit of attention ffs Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rod Posted January 13 Share Posted January 13 11 hours ago, Paully said: Beautifully put! https://true-faith.co.uk/pass-and-move-a-week-of-newcastle-united-12-jan-23/ Sign o’ the Times It’s Friday morning and I’m still reading stuff about the scudding United handed out to the Mackems on their patch. There has been a lot of talk about the team photo taken post-match in front of the Jason Tindall Stand (aka North Stand) with some media gobshites piling in to give us their unwanted opinions. Strangely there has been less coverage of the misogynistic abuse hurled in the direction of Amanda Staveley (complete with disgusting flag) in ignorance of the Huntingdon’s Disease which she suffers from. We’ve almost become used to the abuse rained down on Alan Shearer and long in the tooth Mags remember the “Jackie Is Dead” chanting from the Fulwell End in the early 90s and not to mention the abuse towards Sir Bobby Robson “he’s nearly dead”, “he’s pissed himself” and latterly the poison towards Gary Speed tragedy. Additionally there has been little coverage of the Islamophobic and racist abuse to go the way of Ms Staveley’s husband Mehrdad Ghodoussi on account of his Iranian heritage and a wider pig ignorant stereotyping of Saudis as terrorists. This is all weaponised by the FTM goon squad but I ask the question would it be brushed under the account had we Mags been the protagonists? I seriously doubt it. Those of us with long memories know The Guardian would have been all over it. It seems hate-chanting gets a pass so as long as it’s from a club you like. However, it is perhaps no bad thing key members of United’s board of directors have been given an insight into the bitter and toxic nature of the worst element’s Sunderland’s support. Vengeance is a dish best tasted cold etc. There was more bitter weirdness in the aftermath of the game when Sunderland’s army of anonymous trolls targeted the company they believed were responsible for the signage at the Black Cats bar last week which caused thousands of heads to drop off in perhaps one of football’s best over-reactions in memory. The intention of the abuse and trolling is obviously to damage the sign company’s business – regardless of whether they employed Sunderland supporters or not – they would likely be collateral damage in the warped logic of those attacking a local, independent business that provides employment in the NE. Is it any wonder loads of Mags hope we never have to clap eyes on them for a very long time. I just wish that could give loads of likes. So well put and 100% truthful. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Erikse Posted January 13 Share Posted January 13 (edited) 17 hours ago, Dancing Brave said: mackems wrong again. Firm wrongly targeted with abuse over derby signs https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/articles/c9e2l2pdj72o Is it just me, or does that guy look a little bit like Steve Bruce? Edited January 13 by Erikse Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now