Jump to content
Newcastle-Online

sunderland

Big River

by Big River
in Football

 Share

Recommended Posts

Dokko

Dokko

Posted
Posted
1 hour ago, Groundhog63 said:

The thread about getting bought is canny lolz

 

Dreyfuss is going to make a mint, apparently.

 

Terrible timing that. Players heads messed with. Do they get to stsy if thry go up, or is it better for them to stay in the championship. Additional pressure on promotion. Oops.

Link to post
Share on other sites
KennyUtd

KennyUtd

Posted
Posted

Just mental how they keep telling themselves that they're a great investment for somebody with loads of money. When has this ever been the case for them? Billionaires weren't queueing up when they were in the Prem nevermind now. Loads of other clubs would be a better proposition than those fucks.

Link to post
Share on other sites
NE27

NE27

Posted
Posted
4 minutes ago, Terrymac1966 said:

So how does nobody else know about it except this one bloke 🙈

 

Sleuthing on N-O/nufc social media consists of scouring companies house, checking chartered flights and their passengers. Scrutinising bread pictures and watching court cases.

 

Ready to groom happily go with "trust me, I heard it from a mate FTM SMB 9-1"

Link to post
Share on other sites
Chris_R

Chris_R

Posted
Posted
19 minutes ago, KennyUtd said:

Just mental how they keep telling themselves that they're a great investment for somebody with loads of money. When has this ever been the case for them? Billionaires weren't queueing up when they were in the Prem nevermind now. Loads of other clubs would be a better proposition than those fucks.

 

They were owned by a billionaire.

 

He invested shitloads into them, sold them, and turned himself into a millionaire.

Link to post
Share on other sites
KennyUtd

KennyUtd

Posted
Posted
24 minutes ago, Chris_R said:

 

They were owned by a billionaire.

 

He invested shitloads into them, sold them, and turned himself into a millionaire.

That is true. Forgot how rich Ellis Short was.

Link to post
Share on other sites
ikri

ikri

Posted
Posted
1 hour ago, sleazy said:

image.thumb.png.ce9abc655416b6ddf9d8557f78311663.png

 

Firstly they don't seem to realise the EFL Cup is not part of the debate.

 

Secondly - richer than PIF????

 

Suddenly fewmin rights aren't so important

 

They wouldn't get it in any case.  There's no way to figure out where players might have moved to which other clubs or what results might have been different in the absence of City.  If they hadn't played Man City in the final they could have ended up losing against Liverpool, Arsenal or any of the other big teams.

Link to post
Share on other sites
GEFAFWISP

GEFAFWISP

Posted
Posted
8 minutes ago, ikri said:

 

They wouldn't get it in any case.  There's no way to figure out where players might have moved to which other clubs or what results might have been different in the absence of City.  If they hadn't played Man City in the final they could have ended up losing against Liverpool, Arsenal or any of the other big teams.

Also the mackems winning the cup (on a technicality that won't be happening anyways...) "before" Newcastle doesn't remove any shine off our achievements except in their obsesses heads. Only time them winning it would be bad is if they slapped us to do it.

Link to post
Share on other sites
pinkeye

pinkeye

Posted
Posted

Mackelogically they will presume that they are the default winners regardless of whether it was officially ratified - in the event of Man City being stripped of any silverware that was won during the period they are being investigated over their strange financial activities.

Link to post
Share on other sites
Bunk Moreland

Bunk Moreland

Posted
Posted (edited)
13 minutes ago, Tross said:

image.png.8742009ea97eb7fc28830a540586cf7c.png

 

 

 

This will never not be hilarious :lol:


Even more hilariously, this was a whole thread where they went through every English club they were linked to one by one - with even Palace making the list - with no mention at all of Sunderland :naughty:

 

 

 

 

 

Edited by Bunk Moreland

Link to post
Share on other sites
Elric

Elric

Posted
Posted (edited)
1 hour ago, pinkeye said:

Mackelogically they will presume that they are the default winners regardless of whether it was officially ratified - in the event of Man City being stripped of any silverware that was won during the period they are being investigated over their strange financial activities.

 

The fucking irony if that happened though, having the mostest hewge asterisk going next to your only (worthwhile) trophy for generations, marra :lol:

 

 

Edited by Elric

Link to post
Share on other sites
geordiesteve710

geordiesteve710

Posted
Posted
3 hours ago, pinkeye said:

Mackelogically they will presume that they are the default winners regardless of whether it was officially ratified - in the event of Man City being stripped of any silverware that was won during the period they are being investigated over their strange financial activities.

Would be hilarious that. Just like Leeds pretending they have won a European Cup but infinitely more smalltime.

Link to post
Share on other sites
bhoywhonder

bhoywhonder

Posted
Posted (edited)
3 hours ago, Bunk Moreland said:

 

This will never not be hilarious :lol:


Even more hilariously, this was a whole thread where they went through every English club they were linked to one by one - with even Palace making the list - with no mention at all of Sunderland :naughty:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Oh that is superb! How could they have made such a glaring omission?! The Bilbao Black Cats will all be fewming tonight... Both of them.

 

 

Edited by bhoywhonder

Link to post
Share on other sites
RS

RS

Posted
Posted

They don’t often mention that they were once fined a record amount (albeit the previous record fine was given to us) and relegated due to financial irregumarraties. 
 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites
Dokko

Dokko

Posted
Posted
4 hours ago, Tross said:

image.png.8742009ea97eb7fc28830a540586cf7c.png

 

 

 

They'll try and lay claim to anything, regardless how far fetched, and when hit with reality, brush it off or twist it to fit. 

 

Shocked due to their shipbuilding roots they haven't lay claim to marratime law. Originally from the docks on the wear, where MLF were so fucking hard, what they said goes, including at sea, and the king at the time came up to sunderland to beg if he could use it and adopt it across the worlds seas. After agreeing to adopt red and white on the flag of England in return, marratime law was created; only the southern cunts couldn't understand them and by the time they reached London it landed as maritime law.

 

Rest is history. Etc...

Link to post
Share on other sites
Elbel1

Elbel1

Posted
Posted
5 hours ago, ikri said:

 

They wouldn't get it in any case.  There's no way to figure out where players might have moved to which other clubs or what results might have been different in the absence of City.  If they hadn't played Man City in the final they could have ended up losing against Liverpool, Arsenal or any of the other big teams.

I'd say a bigger reason they won't be awarded the cup is because Man City are being charged by the Premier League who have no control over the League Cup 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
 Share
Go to topic listing
×
×
  • Create New...