Jump to content

Now That's What I Call Transfer Rumours! 7


Recommended Posts

10 hours ago, Southerner said:

 Every opportunity he has for the killer pass he doesn't take it. :/

 

Not the best highlight reel.  Everything cuts short before an assist/goal/key pass.  Suggests he does a bit of dribbling - in a weak league - but not much in the final third.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thinking of Andrey Santos and Angelo Gabriel. Because they are both of "academy age" does it count when it comes to FFP?

Read some people saying  that it doesn't count when it comes to FFP. Would be shrewd moves if so. Sounds too good though.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I watch a lot of South American football, and can see why we have an interest in Brazil. Seem to be producing some mega talent right now.

 

I would look at Argentina too. 

eg: Alan Varela from Boca would be a great DM. He will certainly move to a big European club

Boca is a mess of a club (although they won the league). They have so much talent not even getting a game, or out on loan

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Imagine if we'd landed Santos, Gabriel, Endrick and they join Kuol in our academy- godfathered by Bruno, Joelinton and St Max - that'd be some flair academy and a superb young family of talent that could break into the first team in thee or four years.

Link to post
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, David Edgar said:

 

Not the best highlight reel.  Everything cuts short before an assist/goal/key pass.  Suggests he does a bit of dribbling - in a weak league - but not much in the final third.

Mainly because he hasn’t produced owt.  1 goal in 60-odd appearances.  Most of those dribbles are left-right or vice versa, or go nowhere.

 

YouTube can make anyone look decent. Nothing to get excited about from that clip to be frank - doesn’t mean he’d be a bad signing, of course. 

Link to post
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Emotic said:

Imagine if we'd landed Santos, Gabriel, Endrick and they join Kuol in our academy- godfathered by Bruno, Joelinton and St Max - that'd be some flair academy and a superb young family of talent that could break into the first team in thee or four years.

We’re not getting Endrick like haha 

Link to post
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Ikon said:

Thinking of Andrey Santos and Angelo Gabriel. Because they are both of "academy age" does it count when it comes to FFP?

Read some people saying  that it doesn't count when it comes to FFP. Would be shrewd moves if so. Sounds too good though.

No, it will count.  Youth development costs can be excluded - this is how the PL rules define these costs:

 

“A.1.252.
  “Youth Development Expenditure” means expenditure by a Club directly attributable to activities to train, educate and develop Academy Players net of any portion of Central Funds paid to Clubs solely for the purpose of such activities”

 

So if you spend £20m on a 16-year-old, you might be able to deduct training and education costs.  Not the transfer fee. 

Link to post
Share on other sites

18 minutes ago, Jack27 said:

We’re not getting Endrick like haha 

Surprisingly, there are a few players out there who are "too good for us". [emoji38] He's one of them. Magnificent player, such maturity and talent for a bairn.

Link to post
Share on other sites

34 minutes ago, Emotic said:

Surprisingly, there are a few players out there who are "too good for us". [emoji38] He's one of them. Magnificent player, such maturity and talent for a bairn.

Not sure a 16 year old lad can be classed as too good for us 

Link to post
Share on other sites

I must be one of few who is actually not really bothered about signing a designated defensive midfielder. I thought we probably needed one in the summer but I think if you can set up a team to play without one then that is far preferable. If you get the requisite energy, workrate and quality on the ball from a midfield 3 you don't need somebody who is exclusively there to enforce.

 

Adding more quality and depth to the midfield area - sure.

Link to post
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, ponsaelius said:

I must be one of few who is actually not really bothered about signing a designated defensive midfielder. I thought we probably needed one in the summer but I think if you can set up a team to play without one then that is far preferable. If you get the requisite energy, workrate and quality on the ball from a midfield 3 you don't need somebody who is exclusively there to enforce.

 

Adding more quality and depth to the midfield area - sure.


This

Link to post
Share on other sites

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
×
×
  • Create New...