Jump to content

Now That's What I Call Transfer Rumours! 7


Rich

Recommended Posts

If you're in the top 6 and have money to spend then you can buy many talented players, and Tielemans is obviously talented, but just because you can it doesn't mean you should. I said in the summer that none of the ESL 6 are buying Tielemans and I'm sticking to it (though nothing Chelsea does would surprise me).

Link to post
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, SUPERTOON said:

The Tielemans hate on here is mad, he may not suit our way of playing, but he’s still a fantastic player.

Tielemans would be a decent signing for you. I say this because you need deep enough pockets to sign and pay someone to play in his place, during the long periods of poor form he delivers. On his day, he is up there with th best, the rest of the time, a passenger. We cant cope with this, but our elite coach picks him whether hes in form or out. 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Just now, Jack27 said:

FFP is a myth 

Seems disproportionately levered towards the top 6, who built their squads/infrastructure/club/sponsorships without having the constraints of FFP, yes. A myth though? No. Which is why we can’t splash the same money as Chelsea/Man City/Man Utd etc. 

Link to post
Share on other sites

7 minutes ago, Jack27 said:

FFP is a myth 

Not according to several clubs this season, they’ve made more changes then they have over the last decade I believe.  It was naturally changed straight after our take over so all eyes will be on us.

 

 

Edited by Gawalls

Link to post
Share on other sites

9 minutes ago, Jack27 said:

FFP is a myth 

 

It's not a myth, but it's a mechanism that serves the cartel. The big six's revenue dwarfs everyone elses, so they can pretty much spend what they want and comply with FFP.

 

They've doubled down now with the related party transaction stuff.

Link to post
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, PeepShow4life said:

It just seems to be a myth to Chelsea and Barca.

Chelsea income 20/21 was nearly €500m. Ours was about 150m. You can spend according to what you bring in, which is why increased sponsorship and commercialisation is so crucial (as well as stadium expansion, to a degree). 

Link to post
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, Manxst said:

Chelsea income 20/21 was nearly €500m. Ours was about 150m. You can spend according to what you bring in, which is why increased sponsorship and commercialisation is so crucial (as well as stadium expansion, to a degree). 

And turning reserve etc into a larger revenue stream with larger loan fees. Chelsea make tons doing this I reckon.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Just now, Gawalls said:

And turning reserve etc into a larger revenue stream with larger loan fees. Chelsea make tons doing this I reckon.

Not just loan fees, but a huge source of income is selling the young players that they’ve stockpiled and never played. We will start to do that too, I’m sure, as a source of income, as the club develops.

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, Manxst said:

Not just loan fees, but a huge source of income is selling the young players that they’ve stockpiled and never played. We will start to do that too, I’m sure, as a source of income, as the club develops.

 

As they say money breeds money - not that I’d ever know.

Link to post
Share on other sites

32 minutes ago, The Prophet said:

 

It's not a myth, but it's a mechanism that serves the cartel. The big six's revenue dwarfs everyone elses, so they can pretty much spend what they want and comply with FFP.

 

They've doubled down now with the related party transaction stuff.

The NUFC rule.

Link to post
Share on other sites

53 minutes ago, The Prophet said:

 

It's not a myth, but it's a mechanism that serves the cartel. The big six's revenue dwarfs everyone elses, so they can pretty much spend what they want and comply with FFP.

 

They've doubled down now with the related party transaction stuff.

Of course its beneficial to the 'Big 6 (comical term imo)' they want to pull the bridge up behind them and hide behind all their 'Big 6' Revenue, most of which is creative accounting.

 

Only way FFP gets involved is if its a threat to the status quo.

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Numbers said:

Of course its beneficial to the 'Big 6 (comical term imo)' they want to pull the bridge up behind them and hide behind all their 'Big 6' Revenue, most of which is creative accounting.

 

Only way FFP gets involved is if its a threat to the status quo.

 

 

 

You do know that the incredible alliance of NUFC and it's new owners will (reasonably soon) break the Septic Six Cartel FOR EVER.

 

Our owners are very clever people, they will do what needs to be done and they ("we") will achieve what needs to be achieved.

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
×
×
  • Create New...