Jump to content

Recommended Posts

7 minutes ago, SUPERTOON said:

 

Literally just the same shit he spouted earlier. Was wrong about Botman. Was wrong about our Budget. Standard journalist moving goalposts to suit his agenda and get clicks. The mans a grade A cunt. 

Link to post
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Hanshithispantz said:

Is Edwards not just reposting old news in the hope of saving face and preying the already agreed deal is agreed when he says it is? 

Nobody knows what’s going on yet - neither club had said anything, just a load of journalists with typical news we’ve had all window.

 

a big part of me will be happy when it closes as this isn’t good for my nerves. 

Link to post
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Hanshithispantz said:

Is Edwards not just reposting old news in the hope of saving face and preying the already agreed deal is agreed when he says it is? 


Who knows. Seems awfully quick on the phone to his sources when he’s seemingly been rumbled as a 3rd tier reporter though. Also, his sources are coincidentally way more confident of a deal now than an hour ago.

Link to post
Share on other sites

8 minutes ago, Hanshithispantz said:

Is Edwards not just reposting old news in the hope of saving face and preying the already agreed deal is agreed when he says it is? 

 

Yeah, Jason Burt's name is on the article and he posted this half an hour after Romano's 'here we go'.

 

 

 

 

Edited by Jackie Broon

Link to post
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Kid Icarus said:

Weird, I would have thought you'd be impressed that he's literally doing the thing you claim he never does. 


I’m just winding you up man.

 

I just find it really odd that people treat him like some kind of gospel when it’s clear as day that he’s a news aggregator. He rarely (if ever) breaks stories, and when he does he appears to just be making educated guesses / jumps the gun.

 

I just think it’s hilarious that people give his “here we go” bullshit more weight than actual journalists with actual ability and actual sources.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Just now, Shadow Puppets said:


I’m just winding you up man.

 

I just find it really odd that people treat him like some kind of gospel when it’s clear as day that he’s a news aggregator. He rarely (if ever) breaks stories, and when he does he appears to just be making educated guesses / jumps the gun.

 

I just think it’s hilarious that people give his “here we go” bullshit more weight than actual journalists with actual ability and actual sources.

But literally all of what you're saying here is complete bollocks mate :lol:

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

51 minutes ago, Pokerprince2004 said:

Never watched him play before but is he RW and will be playing instead of Almiron or will he be a backup striker? 

 

34 minutes ago, Thumbheed said:

 

Seen a few Watford fans say his best position is a number 10, seem quite emphatic with that too. 

 

Mate described him as more of a 10 than a direct Wilson replacement. Rates him and reckons with the right development will get even better.

Link to post
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Shadow Puppets said:


I’m just winding you up man.

 

I just find it really odd that people treat him like some kind of gospel when it’s clear as day that he’s a news aggregator. He rarely (if ever) breaks stories, and when he does he appears to just be making educated guesses / jumps the gun.

 

I just think it’s hilarious that people give his “here we go” bullshit more weight than actual journalists with actual ability and actual sources.

Sports journalists are rarely actual journalists. There is way too much latitude for when these pricks are wrong.

Link to post
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, Shadow Puppets said:


I’m just winding you up man.

 

I just find it really odd that people treat him like some kind of gospel when it’s clear as day that he’s a news aggregator. He rarely (if ever) breaks stories, and when he does he appears to just be making educated guesses / jumps the gun.

 

I just think it’s hilarious that people give his “here we go” bullshit more weight than actual journalists with actual ability and actual sources.

 

Is there something that makes him not an actual journalist? Is it because he doesn't have a byline in a dying newspaper?

 

And do you honestly believe he has no sources?

Link to post
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, Hhtoon said:

 

 

Mate described him as more of a 10 than a direct Wilson replacement. Rates him and reckons with the right development will get even better.

 

Yeh seen a few people nail down number 10 as his best role - wonder what we've got in mind for him.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...