Jump to content

Alexander Isak - C*nt (resting his glass bones so he can get properly injured at the world cup)


Ha ha ha?  

178 members have voted

  1. 1. Hohoho

    • Hahaha
      93
    • Heeheehee
      85


Recommended Posts

1 hour ago, STM said:

Lads, you are kidding yourself if you think that he wont score loads. 

 

It’s their other 100m+ signing that is the one they should worry about. 

Unless I’m mistaken Isak was a slow starter for us in new seasons? I too have no doubt he’ll hit top form eventually

 

 

Edited by black_n_white

Link to post
Share on other sites

23 minutes ago, Whitley mag said:

Biggest mistake of summer was not offering them Isak to step aside for Ekitike. 
 

Hindsight and all that.

 

 

Definitely worked out that way, and even though I was dead against it at the time, I had no idea that Isak wanted Liverpool so badly.

 

Someone at the club should have had a clue though. 

Link to post
Share on other sites

30 minutes ago, Whitley mag said:

Biggest mistake of summer was not offering them Isak to step aside for Ekitike. 
 

Hindsight and all that.

 

Do you honestly believe that Liverpool were ever going to just step aside and let us sign Ekitike? They wanted both, and can afford to pay both three times what we can offer just one of them. Romano is a client journalist who posts shite like this for clubs and agents that pay him.

Link to post
Share on other sites

36 minutes ago, Whitley mag said:

Biggest mistake of summer was not offering them Isak to step aside for Ekitike. 
 

Hindsight and all that.

They proved that they can go for both and we'll accept it. Hindsight only really shows that it was wishful thinking for it to have gone any other way than it did. The club couldn't have been in a stronger position considering the circumstances, couldn't have had more motivation to not sell to Liverpool and still did it.

 

 

Edited by Kid Icarus

Link to post
Share on other sites

He is the type of player that needs to start games all the time to get the best out of him. He's gonna struggle if he's in and out of the side, can see a scenario we're he go's in a right huff and wants away by seasons end on loan. 😂 I hope we don't offer him a life line. 

Link to post
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, andycap said:

He is the type of player that needs to start games all the time to get the best out of him. He's gonna struggle if he's in and out of the side, can see a scenario we're he go's in a right huff and wants away by seasons end on loan. 😂 I hope we don't offer him a life line. 

Nee chance, I bet Howe fucking hates him. 

Link to post
Share on other sites

41 minutes ago, black_n_white said:

Unless I’m mistaken Isak was a slow starter for us in new seasons? I too have no doubt he’ll hit top form eventually

 

 

 


But he hit form for us by playing loads, he’s clear back up to Etitike right now, so it’s a new change in his career. No longer a guaranteed starter which he has to adjust too and he may well not.

Link to post
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Kid Icarus said:

They proved that they can go for both and we'll accept it. Hindsight only really shows that it was wishful thinking for it to have gone any other way than it did. The club couldn't have been in a stronger position considering the circumstances, couldn't have had more motivation to not sell to Liverpool and still did it.

 

 

 

 

It wasn't wishful thinking that we sat Isak in the reserves. It was the only smart decision then and remains the best decision in hindsight. Whoever makes the decisions buckled at the last minute and it'll have long term consequences, but let's not pretend the club had to sell Isak. We had a choice of short-term or long-term focus and we took the former. 

Link to post
Share on other sites

9 minutes ago, ohmelads said:

 

It wasn't wishful thinking that we sat Isak in the reserves. It was the only smart decision then and remains the best decision in hindsight. Whoever makes the decisions buckled at the last minute and it'll have long term consequences, but let's not pretend the club had to sell Isak. We had a choice of short-term or long-term focus and we took the former. 

 

I think that's exactly what KI was saying. This whole affair has been the final straw for me like, Newcastle are just the first team whose score I look for now. Sad but :dontknow:

Link to post
Share on other sites

18 minutes ago, ohmelads said:

 

It wasn't wishful thinking that we sat Isak in the reserves. It was the only smart decision then and remains the best decision in hindsight. Whoever makes the decisions buckled at the last minute and it'll have long term consequences, but let's not pretend the club had to sell Isak. We had a choice of short-term or long-term focus and we took the former. 

I don't think you're saying anything I disagree with like. The only difference is that for me it was all wishful thinking with hindsight because now we know that the club buckled, to use your word for it.

 

 

Edited by Kid Icarus

Link to post
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, OpenC said:

 

I think that's exactly what KI was saying. This whole affair has been the final straw for me like, Newcastle are just the first team whose score I look for now. Sad but :dontknow:

 

 

I doubt any ownership would make you happy tbh. 

Link to post
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, andycap said:

He is the type of player that needs to start games all the time to get the best out of him. He's gonna struggle if he's in and out of the side, can see a scenario we're he go's in a right huff and wants away by seasons end on loan. 😂 I hope we don't offer him a life line. 

He will be back 

Link to post
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, On the Grid said:

What if it comes out officially that Eddie wanted him out due to bigger picture thinking, the fact he didn't want him around the rest of the squad...did Eddie buckle?

 

 

I've already said this is what I think happened. Howe makes the final decisions on players coming or going, we don't make any signings that don't meet his approval. His attitude changed towards Isak once he realised Isak wasn't fully invested and had no intention of buying in again. Even if we'd made him stay, we'd have had the same carry on in January. 

 

Howe wants players who give 100%, I'm convinced he'd have wanted Isak gone if it allowed him to buy a suitable replacement. 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...